Spillover effects of credit default swaps on corporate disclosure along the supply chain

IF 1.9 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1007/s11156-024-01332-x
Matthew Cedergren, Ting Luo, Jing Wu, Jianqiao Yu, Yue Zhang
{"title":"Spillover effects of credit default swaps on corporate disclosure along the supply chain","authors":"Matthew Cedergren, Ting Luo, Jing Wu, Jianqiao Yu, Yue Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s11156-024-01332-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We investigate the effect of customers’ credit default swap (CDS) referencing on suppliers’ issuance of management forecasts. We argue that customers’ CDS referencing increases the suppliers’ business volatility, making forecasting more difficult. At the same time, the information from customers’ CDS market reduces investors’ demand for the suppliers’ disclosure and induces the suppliers to scale back their own disclosure. By using a difference-in-differences design, we find consistent evidence that firms tend to reduce their frequency of forecast issuance after the initiation of sales to CDS-referenced customers, compared to firms without CDS-referenced customers. This relationship is stronger when the supplier’s business relies more on CDS-referenced customers (thus strengthening the effect of customer CDS referencing on suppliers’ forecasting difficulty). In comparison, the relationship is weaker when customers have more analyst following (thus resulting in less incremental information produced by customer CDS referencing). Further analysis shows that the information channel seems to be the main mechanism for our findings. Finally, we find the negative relationship between the supplier’s management forecast issuance and its exposure to CDS-referenced customer firms is driven by good news forecasts, possibly due to the higher litigation risk associated with disclosing good news and withholding bad news. Our findings add to the literature examining the spillover effects of CDSs on entities outside those directly referenced by CDSs.</p>","PeriodicalId":47688,"journal":{"name":"Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-024-01332-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We investigate the effect of customers’ credit default swap (CDS) referencing on suppliers’ issuance of management forecasts. We argue that customers’ CDS referencing increases the suppliers’ business volatility, making forecasting more difficult. At the same time, the information from customers’ CDS market reduces investors’ demand for the suppliers’ disclosure and induces the suppliers to scale back their own disclosure. By using a difference-in-differences design, we find consistent evidence that firms tend to reduce their frequency of forecast issuance after the initiation of sales to CDS-referenced customers, compared to firms without CDS-referenced customers. This relationship is stronger when the supplier’s business relies more on CDS-referenced customers (thus strengthening the effect of customer CDS referencing on suppliers’ forecasting difficulty). In comparison, the relationship is weaker when customers have more analyst following (thus resulting in less incremental information produced by customer CDS referencing). Further analysis shows that the information channel seems to be the main mechanism for our findings. Finally, we find the negative relationship between the supplier’s management forecast issuance and its exposure to CDS-referenced customer firms is driven by good news forecasts, possibly due to the higher litigation risk associated with disclosing good news and withholding bad news. Our findings add to the literature examining the spillover effects of CDSs on entities outside those directly referenced by CDSs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信用违约掉期对供应链上企业信息披露的溢出效应
我们研究了客户信用违约掉期(CDS)参考对供应商发布管理预测的影响。我们认为,客户的 CDS 参考增加了供应商的业务波动性,使预测变得更加困难。同时,来自客户 CDS 市场的信息降低了投资者对供应商信息披露的需求,促使供应商缩减自己的信息披露。通过使用差分设计,我们发现一致的证据表明,与没有 CDS 参考客户的公司相比,在开始向 CDS 参考客户销售后,公司倾向于降低发布预测的频率。当供应商的业务更依赖于 CDS 参考客户时,这种关系更强(从而加强了客户 CDS 参考对供应商预测难度的影响)。相比之下,当客户有更多分析师关注时,这种关系就会减弱(从而导致客户 CDS 参考所产生的增量信息减少)。进一步分析表明,信息渠道似乎是我们得出结论的主要机制。最后,我们发现供应商管理层的预测发布与 CDS 参考客户公司的风险敞口之间的负相关关系是由好消息预测驱动的,这可能是由于披露好消息而隐瞒坏消息会带来更高的诉讼风险。我们的研究结果丰富了研究 CDS 对 CDS 直接参照实体之外的实体的溢出效应的文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
17.60%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting deals with research involving the interaction of finance with accounting, economics, and quantitative methods, focused on finance and accounting. The papers published present useful theoretical and methodological results with the support of interesting empirical applications. Purely theoretical and methodological research with the potential for important applications is also published. Besides the traditional high-quality theoretical and empirical research in finance, the journal also publishes papers dealing with interdisciplinary topics.
期刊最新文献
The endogeneity of profitability and investment Investment bank reputation and issuance fees: evidence from asset-backed securities CEO power and firm risk at the onset of the 2007 financial crisis and the COVID-19 health crisis: international evidence Top management team incentive dispersion and investment efficiency Non-standard monetary policy measures and bank systemic risk in the Eurozone
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1