Research on the influence of bad working state on air traffic control effect based on multi-independent sample Kruskal-Wallis test

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q2 TRANSPORTATION Journal of Air Transport Management Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2024.102653
Peng Bai , Yanzhou Chen , Linfeng Chen , Xingjian Zhang , Xinhao Wang , Xuan Wang
{"title":"Research on the influence of bad working state on air traffic control effect based on multi-independent sample Kruskal-Wallis test","authors":"Peng Bai ,&nbsp;Yanzhou Chen ,&nbsp;Linfeng Chen ,&nbsp;Xingjian Zhang ,&nbsp;Xinhao Wang ,&nbsp;Xuan Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.jairtraman.2024.102653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study examines the influence of bad working states on the control effect of air traffic controllers by establishing a scoring standard for control performance assessment with eight assessment items, such as the standard radiotelephony communications, and 25 specific assessment contents, such as the completeness of control instructions. Combined with equipment for tower control simulations, this standard assesses and counts the scores of controllers in different states, namely, sober, fatigue, stress, and fatigue &amp; stress. We tested the control effect distributions of four states through the Kruskal-Wallis test and analyzed whether the bad working states were statistically significant for each control effect item. The study found that the bad working states are statistically significant for standard radiotelephony communications, flight progress strips, safety separation, instruction timing, situational awareness, and total control effect score in the control effects. Moreover, the research revealed that bad working states are not statistically significant for equipment inspection, external environment scan, and safety awareness in the control effect. Further, forced pair comparisons of the substantial control effect items showed that controllers have adverse statistically significant effects on the use of flight progress strips, situational awareness, and the total score of control effects when controllers are in a stress state. Meanwhile, they have an adverse statistically significant effect on the standard radiotelephony communications, safety separation and instruction timing, flight progress strips, situational awareness, and the total score of control effects when controllers are under a fatigue &amp; stress state.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":14925,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Air Transport Management","volume":"120 ","pages":"Article 102653"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969699724001182/pdfft?md5=e52b47008825ac786b81a41998803c1f&pid=1-s2.0-S0969699724001182-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Air Transport Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969699724001182","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the influence of bad working states on the control effect of air traffic controllers by establishing a scoring standard for control performance assessment with eight assessment items, such as the standard radiotelephony communications, and 25 specific assessment contents, such as the completeness of control instructions. Combined with equipment for tower control simulations, this standard assesses and counts the scores of controllers in different states, namely, sober, fatigue, stress, and fatigue & stress. We tested the control effect distributions of four states through the Kruskal-Wallis test and analyzed whether the bad working states were statistically significant for each control effect item. The study found that the bad working states are statistically significant for standard radiotelephony communications, flight progress strips, safety separation, instruction timing, situational awareness, and total control effect score in the control effects. Moreover, the research revealed that bad working states are not statistically significant for equipment inspection, external environment scan, and safety awareness in the control effect. Further, forced pair comparisons of the substantial control effect items showed that controllers have adverse statistically significant effects on the use of flight progress strips, situational awareness, and the total score of control effects when controllers are in a stress state. Meanwhile, they have an adverse statistically significant effect on the standard radiotelephony communications, safety separation and instruction timing, flight progress strips, situational awareness, and the total score of control effects when controllers are under a fatigue & stress state.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于多独立样本 Kruskal-Wallis 检验的不良工作状态对空中交通管制效果的影响研究
本研究通过制定管制绩效评估评分标准,包括标准无线电通话等 8 个评估项目和管制指令完整性等 25 个具体评估内容,研究了不良工作状态对空中交通管制员管制效果的影响。结合塔台管制模拟设备,该标准对管制员在清醒、疲劳、压力、疲劳和压力等不同状态下的得分进行评估和统计。我们通过 Kruskal-Wallis 检验法测试了四种状态的控制效果分布,并分析了不良工作状态对各控制效果项目是否具有统计学意义。研究发现,在控制效应中,不良工作状态在标准无线电通话、飞行进度条、安全分离、指令时机、情景意识和控制效应总分上具有统计学意义。此外,研究还发现,在控制效果中,不良工作状态对设备检查、外部环境扫描和安全意识的影响在统计学上不显著。此外,对实质性控制效果项目的强制配对比较显示,当管制员处于紧张状态时,他们对飞行进度条的使用、态势感知和控制效果总分在统计学上有显著的不利影响。同时,当管制员处于疲劳和压力状态时,他们对标准无线电通话、安全分隔和指令计时、飞行进度条、态势感知和管制效果总分在统计上有显著的不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
11.70%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: The Journal of Air Transport Management (JATM) sets out to address, through high quality research articles and authoritative commentary, the major economic, management and policy issues facing the air transport industry today. It offers practitioners and academics an international and dynamic forum for analysis and discussion of these issues, linking research and practice and stimulating interaction between the two. The refereed papers in the journal cover all the major sectors of the industry (airlines, airports, air traffic management) as well as related areas such as tourism management and logistics. Papers are blind reviewed, normally by two referees, chosen for their specialist knowledge. The journal provides independent, original and rigorous analysis in the areas of: • Policy, regulation and law • Strategy • Operations • Marketing • Economics and finance • Sustainability
期刊最新文献
Stochastic infection risk models for aircraft seat assignment considering passenger vaccination status and seat location Addressing the impact of airport pricing, investment and operations on greenhouse gas emissions Editorial Board A privacy-preserving federated learning approach for airline upgrade optimization Exploring prediction accuracy for optimal taxi times in airport operations using various machine learning models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1