Attention Training After Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in Adults: A Systematic Review

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2024.07.010
Alexa C. Soule MA, Taryn J. Fish MA, Kevin G.F. Thomas PhD, Leigh Schrieff-Brown PhD
{"title":"Attention Training After Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in Adults: A Systematic Review","authors":"Alexa C. Soule MA,&nbsp;Taryn J. Fish MA,&nbsp;Kevin G.F. Thomas PhD,&nbsp;Leigh Schrieff-Brown PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2024.07.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To determine the extent and efficacy of attentional training as a form of neuropsychological rehabilitation to ameliorate attention deficits in adults with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury.</div></div><div><h3>Data Sources</h3><div>Articles published in Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Library, PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched between January 17, and February 27, 2021.</div></div><div><h3>Study Selection</h3><div>Two reviewers blindly assessed studies for eligibility according to the following criteria: any article evaluating the efficacy of any type of behavioral intervention that targeted attention (by means of cognitive rehabilitative, psychoeducational, or neuropsychological strategies, at either an individual or group level) in adults who had sustained a formally documented moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury.</div></div><div><h3>Data Extraction</h3><div>Methodological quality of each article was blindly assessed by 2 reviewers. Data were extracted from each study, including study type, sample size, sample characteristics, summary of intervention, measures used to assess attention, statistical outcomes and results, effect size, conclusion, and limitations.</div></div><div><h3>Data Synthesis</h3><div>7314 articles were retrieved from databases, 4325 articles remained after duplicate removal, and finally 21 articles met eligibility criteria and were included in this review. Articles represented varied methodological quality in group or single subject design. Irrespective of the heterogeneity regarding intervention types and attentional outcome measures used across the studies, overall findings suggest that attentional gains can be made in this sample, irrespective of time since injury, age, and injury severity. Further, a growing interest in technology-based interventions is frequently used and holds promise to bettering rehabilitation efforts. However, there is still limited evidence supporting the ecological validity of attentional training interventions (eg, the transfer of treatment effects to daily activities).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This article plays a crucial role in informing ongoing rehabilitation practices, guiding clinicians with evidence-based strategies and shaping future research directions for more effective attentional training guidelines.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":"106 3","pages":"Pages 433-443"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999324011377","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To determine the extent and efficacy of attentional training as a form of neuropsychological rehabilitation to ameliorate attention deficits in adults with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury.

Data Sources

Articles published in Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Library, PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched between January 17, and February 27, 2021.

Study Selection

Two reviewers blindly assessed studies for eligibility according to the following criteria: any article evaluating the efficacy of any type of behavioral intervention that targeted attention (by means of cognitive rehabilitative, psychoeducational, or neuropsychological strategies, at either an individual or group level) in adults who had sustained a formally documented moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury.

Data Extraction

Methodological quality of each article was blindly assessed by 2 reviewers. Data were extracted from each study, including study type, sample size, sample characteristics, summary of intervention, measures used to assess attention, statistical outcomes and results, effect size, conclusion, and limitations.

Data Synthesis

7314 articles were retrieved from databases, 4325 articles remained after duplicate removal, and finally 21 articles met eligibility criteria and were included in this review. Articles represented varied methodological quality in group or single subject design. Irrespective of the heterogeneity regarding intervention types and attentional outcome measures used across the studies, overall findings suggest that attentional gains can be made in this sample, irrespective of time since injury, age, and injury severity. Further, a growing interest in technology-based interventions is frequently used and holds promise to bettering rehabilitation efforts. However, there is still limited evidence supporting the ecological validity of attentional training interventions (eg, the transfer of treatment effects to daily activities).

Conclusions

This article plays a crucial role in informing ongoing rehabilitation practices, guiding clinicians with evidence-based strategies and shaping future research directions for more effective attentional training guidelines.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人中重度脑损伤后的注意力训练:系统回顾。
目的确定注意力训练作为神经心理康复的一种形式,对改善中重度创伤性脑损伤成人注意力缺陷的程度和效果:检索了2021年1月17日至2月27日期间在CINAHL、Cochrane Library、PubMed、PsycINFO、Scopus和Web of Science上发表的文章:两名审稿人根据以下标准对研究的资格进行了盲法评估:任何一篇评估针对注意力的任何类型的行为干预(通过认知康复、心理教育或神经心理学策略,在个人或团体层面)对遭受正式记录的中度至重度创伤性脑损伤的成年人的疗效的文章:每篇文章的方法学质量由两名审稿人进行盲评。从每项研究中提取数据,包括研究类型、样本大小、样本特征、干预措施概述、用于评估注意力的措施、统计结果和结果、效应大小、结论和局限性。数据综合:从数据库中检索到 7 314 篇文章,去除重复内容后剩余 4 325 篇文章,最终有 21 篇文章符合资格标准并纳入本综述。这些文章的方法学质量参差不齐,有分组研究,也有单人研究。尽管各项研究中使用的干预类型和注意力结果测量方法存在差异,但总体研究结果表明,无论受伤时间长短、年龄和受伤严重程度如何,注意力都可以在样本中得到提高。此外,人们对基于技术的干预措施越来越感兴趣,这些干预措施被频繁使用,并有望改善康复工作。然而,支持注意力训练干预的生态有效性(如治疗效果向日常活动的转移)的证据仍然有限:本文在为当前的康复实践提供信息、指导临床医生采用循证策略以及为更有效的注意力训练指南确定未来研究方向方面发挥着至关重要的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
495
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities. Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.
期刊最新文献
Pneumonia Prolongs Rehabilitation Length of Stay and Induces Excess Costs in Adults with Acute Spinal Cord Injury: A Causal Inference Study Using Prospective Multi-Center Data. Technology-Based Physical Rehabilitation for Balance in people with Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Development of a Multidimensional, Multigroup Measure of Cognitive-Communication for Inpatient Rehabilitation. Masthead Table of Contents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1