Factors associated with difficult intravenous access in the paediatric emergency department: A prospective cohort study

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Emergency Medicine Australasia Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1111/1742-6723.14477
Lucy Dunstan MBBS, Amy L Sweeny MPH, Clayton Lam MD, Bianca Goucher BN, Stuart Watkins MBChB, Shane George MBBS, MPH, Peter J Snelling MBBS, MPHTM
{"title":"Factors associated with difficult intravenous access in the paediatric emergency department: A prospective cohort study","authors":"Lucy Dunstan MBBS,&nbsp;Amy L Sweeny MPH,&nbsp;Clayton Lam MD,&nbsp;Bianca Goucher BN,&nbsp;Stuart Watkins MBChB,&nbsp;Shane George MBBS, MPH,&nbsp;Peter J Snelling MBBS, MPHTM","doi":"10.1111/1742-6723.14477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Although it is the most performed invasive procedure, peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) insertion in children can be difficult. The primary objective of the study was to identify the factors associated with difficult intravenous access (DIVA) in the paediatric ED, including patient, proceduralist and situational factors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This was a single-centre prospective observational cohort study conducted over 28 consecutive days. Research assistants observed PIVC insertion attempts for children under 16 years of age and recorded data for variables relating to the patient, proceduralist and event. Univariate logistic regression modelling was performed to identify factors associated with DIVA, defined as unsuccessful PIVC insertion on the first attempt.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 134 participants were recruited; 66 were male (49%) with a median age of 5.7 years. Fifty-two (39%) were classified as having DIVA. There was a total of 207 PIVC insertion attempts with two or more attempts needed for 48 children (36%). Patient factors associated with DIVA included age of 3 years or less and limited vein options. Proceduralist factors included gestalt of 50% or less chance of success, use of a larger gauge (smaller bore) PIVC and less PIVC insertion experience. Situational factors included a combative child, higher pain score and loud ambient noise.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The present study identified multiple patient, proceduralist and situational factors that were associated with DIVA in the paediatric ED. Future studies should explore the development and implementation of a package to address DIVA in children, with the patient-centred goals of reducing pain and improving success.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11604,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1742-6723.14477","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1742-6723.14477","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Although it is the most performed invasive procedure, peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) insertion in children can be difficult. The primary objective of the study was to identify the factors associated with difficult intravenous access (DIVA) in the paediatric ED, including patient, proceduralist and situational factors.

Methods

This was a single-centre prospective observational cohort study conducted over 28 consecutive days. Research assistants observed PIVC insertion attempts for children under 16 years of age and recorded data for variables relating to the patient, proceduralist and event. Univariate logistic regression modelling was performed to identify factors associated with DIVA, defined as unsuccessful PIVC insertion on the first attempt.

Results

A total of 134 participants were recruited; 66 were male (49%) with a median age of 5.7 years. Fifty-two (39%) were classified as having DIVA. There was a total of 207 PIVC insertion attempts with two or more attempts needed for 48 children (36%). Patient factors associated with DIVA included age of 3 years or less and limited vein options. Proceduralist factors included gestalt of 50% or less chance of success, use of a larger gauge (smaller bore) PIVC and less PIVC insertion experience. Situational factors included a combative child, higher pain score and loud ambient noise.

Conclusions

The present study identified multiple patient, proceduralist and situational factors that were associated with DIVA in the paediatric ED. Future studies should explore the development and implementation of a package to address DIVA in children, with the patient-centred goals of reducing pain and improving success.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿科急诊室静脉通路困难的相关因素:前瞻性队列研究。
目的:虽然外周静脉导管插入术(PIVC)是最常见的侵入性手术,但在儿童身上插入却很困难。本研究的主要目的是确定儿科急诊室静脉置管困难(DIVA)的相关因素,包括患者、手术医师和情境因素:这是一项连续 28 天进行的单中心前瞻性观察队列研究。研究助理观察了16岁以下儿童的PIVC插入尝试,并记录了与患者、程序师和事件相关的变量数据。进行了单变量逻辑回归建模,以确定与 DIVA 相关的因素,DIVA 的定义是首次尝试插入 PIVC 不成功:共招募了 134 名参与者,其中 66 人为男性(49%),年龄中位数为 5.7 岁。52人(39%)被归类为 DIVA 患者。共进行了207次PIVC插入尝试,其中48名儿童(36%)需要进行两次或两次以上的插入尝试。与 DIVA 相关的患者因素包括年龄在 3 岁或 3 岁以下以及静脉选择有限。手术者因素包括成功几率为50%或更低的妊高症、使用较大口径(较小孔径)的PIVC和较少的PIVC插入经验。情境因素包括好斗的孩子、较高的疼痛评分和嘈杂的环境噪音:本研究发现了与儿科急诊室 DIVA 相关的患者、手术医师和情境因素。未来的研究应探讨如何开发和实施一套解决儿童 DIVA 问题的方案,以患者为中心,实现减少疼痛和提高成功率的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Australasia
Emergency Medicine Australasia 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
13.00%
发文量
217
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Emergency Medicine Australasia is the official journal of the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM) and the Australasian Society for Emergency Medicine (ASEM), and publishes original articles dealing with all aspects of clinical practice, research, education and experiences in emergency medicine. Original articles are published under the following sections: Original Research, Paediatric Emergency Medicine, Disaster Medicine, Education and Training, Ethics, International Emergency Medicine, Management and Quality, Medicolegal Matters, Prehospital Care, Public Health, Rural and Remote Care, Technology, Toxicology and Trauma. Accepted papers become the copyright of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Review article: Primer for clinical researchers on innovative trial designs for emergency medicine. Issue Information Cover Image Divide and conquer? Emergency medicine subspecialties in Australasia Emergency medicine needs a narrower scope and a broader worldview
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1