Anatomic obstacles in cavotricuspid isthmus detected by modified 2D transthoracic echocardiography and long-term outcomes in radiofrequency ablation of typical atrial flutter.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY Folia morphologica Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI:10.5603/fm.100953
Marta Kacprzyk, Ewelina Dołęga-Dołęgowska, Grzegorz Karkowski, Jacek Lelakowski, Artur Kacprzyk, Marta Krzysztofik, Patryk Ostrowski, Michał Bonczar, Halina Dobrzynski, Marcin Kuniewicz
{"title":"Anatomic obstacles in cavotricuspid isthmus detected by modified 2D transthoracic echocardiography and long-term outcomes in radiofrequency ablation of typical atrial flutter.","authors":"Marta Kacprzyk, Ewelina Dołęga-Dołęgowska, Grzegorz Karkowski, Jacek Lelakowski, Artur Kacprzyk, Marta Krzysztofik, Patryk Ostrowski, Michał Bonczar, Halina Dobrzynski, Marcin Kuniewicz","doi":"10.5603/fm.100953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although radiofrequency ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI), responsible for sustaining atrial flutter, is a highly effective procedure, in extended patients' observations following this procedure, more than every tenth becomes unsuccessful. Therefore, this study aimed to provide helpful information about the anatomy of the CTI in transthoracic echocardiography, which can aid in better planning of the CTI radiofrequency ablation in patients with typical atrial flutter.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>56 patients with typical atrial flutter after radiofrequency ablation were evaluated at the end of the 24-month observation period. With substernal modified transthoracic echocardiographic (mTTE) evaluation, we identified four main anatomical obstacles impeding radiofrequency ablation. These obstacles were tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, cavotricuspid isthmus length, cavotricuspid isthmus morphology, and the presence of a prominent Eustachian ridge/Eustachian valve. All intraprocedural radiofrequency ablation data were collected for analysis and correlated with anatomical data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the 24-month observation period, freedom from atrial flutter was 67.86%. The mean length of the isthmus was 30.34 ± 6.67 mm. The isthmus morphology in 56 patients was categorized as flat (n = 27; 48.2%), concave (n = 10; 17.85%), and pouch (n = 19, 33.9%). A prominent Eustachian ridge was observed in 23 patients (41.1%). Lack of anatomical obstacles in mTTE evaluation resulted in 100% efficacy, while the presence of at least two obstacles significantly increased the risk of unsuccessful ablation with more than two (OR 12.31 p = 0.01). Generally, 8 mm electrodes were the most effective for non-difficult CTI, while 3.5 mm electrodes used with a 3D system had highest performance for complex CTI. Notably, aging was the only factor that worsened the long-term outcome (OR 1.07 p = 0.044).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preoperative usage of mTTE evaluation helps predict difficulty in cavotricuspid isthmus radiofrequency ablation, thus allowing better planning of the radiofrequency ablation strategy using the most accurate radiofrequency ablation electrode.</p>","PeriodicalId":12251,"journal":{"name":"Folia morphologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Folia morphologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/fm.100953","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although radiofrequency ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI), responsible for sustaining atrial flutter, is a highly effective procedure, in extended patients' observations following this procedure, more than every tenth becomes unsuccessful. Therefore, this study aimed to provide helpful information about the anatomy of the CTI in transthoracic echocardiography, which can aid in better planning of the CTI radiofrequency ablation in patients with typical atrial flutter.

Materials and methods: 56 patients with typical atrial flutter after radiofrequency ablation were evaluated at the end of the 24-month observation period. With substernal modified transthoracic echocardiographic (mTTE) evaluation, we identified four main anatomical obstacles impeding radiofrequency ablation. These obstacles were tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, cavotricuspid isthmus length, cavotricuspid isthmus morphology, and the presence of a prominent Eustachian ridge/Eustachian valve. All intraprocedural radiofrequency ablation data were collected for analysis and correlated with anatomical data.

Results: In the 24-month observation period, freedom from atrial flutter was 67.86%. The mean length of the isthmus was 30.34 ± 6.67 mm. The isthmus morphology in 56 patients was categorized as flat (n = 27; 48.2%), concave (n = 10; 17.85%), and pouch (n = 19, 33.9%). A prominent Eustachian ridge was observed in 23 patients (41.1%). Lack of anatomical obstacles in mTTE evaluation resulted in 100% efficacy, while the presence of at least two obstacles significantly increased the risk of unsuccessful ablation with more than two (OR 12.31 p = 0.01). Generally, 8 mm electrodes were the most effective for non-difficult CTI, while 3.5 mm electrodes used with a 3D system had highest performance for complex CTI. Notably, aging was the only factor that worsened the long-term outcome (OR 1.07 p = 0.044).

Conclusions: Preoperative usage of mTTE evaluation helps predict difficulty in cavotricuspid isthmus radiofrequency ablation, thus allowing better planning of the radiofrequency ablation strategy using the most accurate radiofrequency ablation electrode.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改良二维经胸超声心动图检测到的腔隙峡部解剖障碍与典型心房扑动射频消融术的长期疗效
背景:尽管对导致心房扑动持续存在的腔隙峡部(CTI)进行射频消融是一种非常有效的手术,但在该手术后对患者的长期观察中,有超过十分之一的患者不成功。因此,本研究旨在通过经胸超声心动图提供有关 CTI 解剖的有用信息,从而帮助典型心房扑动患者更好地规划 CTI 射频消融术。通过经胸壁下改良超声心动图(mTTE)评估,我们确定了阻碍射频消融的四个主要解剖障碍。这些障碍包括三尖瓣环面收缩期偏移、腔咽峡长度、腔咽峡形态以及咽鼓管嵴/咽鼓管瓣突出。收集所有术中射频消融数据进行分析,并与解剖数据进行关联:在24个月的观察期内,心房扑动发生率为67.86%。峡部的平均长度为(30.34 ± 6.67)毫米。56 名患者的峡部形态分为平坦型(27 人,占 48.2%)、凹陷型(10 人,占 17.85%)和袋状型(19 人,占 33.9%)。在 23 名患者(41.1%)中观察到突出的咽鼓管嵴。在 mTTE 评估中,如果没有解剖障碍,则有效率为 100%,而如果存在至少两个障碍,则会显著增加消融不成功的风险(OR 12.31 p = 0.01)。一般来说,8 毫米电极对非疑难 CTI 最有效,而 3.5 毫米电极与三维系统配合使用,对复杂 CTI 的效果最好。值得注意的是,年龄是导致长期结果恶化的唯一因素(OR 1.07 p = 0.044):结论:术前使用 mTTE 评估有助于预测腔静脉峡部射频消融的难度,从而更好地规划射频消融策略,使用最精确的射频消融电极。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Folia morphologica
Folia morphologica ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
218
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: "Folia Morphologica" is an official journal of the Polish Anatomical Society (a Constituent Member of European Federation for Experimental Morphology - EFEM). It contains original articles and reviews on morphology in the broadest sense (descriptive, experimental, and methodological). Papers dealing with practical application of morphological research to clinical problems may also be considered. Full-length papers as well as short research notes can be submitted. Descriptive papers dealing with non-mammals, cannot be accepted for publication with some exception.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of the efficacy of medial tarsal venous flaps and traditional venous/arterial free flaps in the reconstruction of hand soft tissue defects: a new type of physiological flap. A bilateral fetal origin of the posterior cerebral artery coexisting with an absent A1 segment of the anterior cerebral artery. Anatomical study of brachial plexuses of a koala, a Tasmanian devil, and a common ringtail possum. Is there a sexual dimorphism in Wormian bones presence? A study on Polish and Lithuanian sample. Lower limb interosseous membrane in foetuses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1