A Review on Traditional Medicine Used for Burn Treatment.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Journal of Burn Care & Research Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1093/jbcr/irae152
Soodabeh Hoveidamanesh, Rana Irilouzadian, Tooran Bagheri, Mahdy Saboury, Shirin Fahimi Tafreshi, Tayyeb Ghadimi, Samira Soleimanpour, Mohammad Sanaienia, Siamak Farokh Forghani
{"title":"A Review on Traditional Medicine Used for Burn Treatment.","authors":"Soodabeh Hoveidamanesh, Rana Irilouzadian, Tooran Bagheri, Mahdy Saboury, Shirin Fahimi Tafreshi, Tayyeb Ghadimi, Samira Soleimanpour, Mohammad Sanaienia, Siamak Farokh Forghani","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/irae152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Considering the high consumption of and preference for traditional treatments among people and the lack of enough studies on the effectiveness of these treatments, we aimed to review articles on the use of traditional and complementary medicine, focusing on how they affect healing, debridement, and hypertrophic scars. In this study, we conducted the literature search in international databases PubMed, Google Scholar, Ovid, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, as well as Persian databases Scientific Information Database (SID), Magiran, Iranmedex, and IranDoc. Retrieved hits were reviewed by three authors for screening based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the screening process is expressed as Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses framework flow chart. Twenty-two studies were included. The evaluated outcomes were wound healing in 19, pain control in 5, itching in 4, and scar appearance in 2 studies. All of the studies showed equal or improved effects compared to common treatments. Aloe vera, Centella asiatica, and Arnebia euchroma were the most common plants. We revealed that traditional medicine is beneficial in burn wound treatment. The diversity in ingredients that are used in traditional medicine brings up the need for further controlled prospective studies to evaluate the precise superiority of these treatments compared to standard care.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":"1598-1606"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irae152","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Considering the high consumption of and preference for traditional treatments among people and the lack of enough studies on the effectiveness of these treatments, we aimed to review articles on the use of traditional and complementary medicine, focusing on how they affect healing, debridement, and hypertrophic scars. In this study, we conducted the literature search in international databases PubMed, Google Scholar, Ovid, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, as well as Persian databases Scientific Information Database (SID), Magiran, Iranmedex, and IranDoc. Retrieved hits were reviewed by three authors for screening based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the screening process is expressed as Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses framework flow chart. Twenty-two studies were included. The evaluated outcomes were wound healing in 19, pain control in 5, itching in 4, and scar appearance in 2 studies. All of the studies showed equal or improved effects compared to common treatments. Aloe vera, Centella asiatica, and Arnebia euchroma were the most common plants. We revealed that traditional medicine is beneficial in burn wound treatment. The diversity in ingredients that are used in traditional medicine brings up the need for further controlled prospective studies to evaluate the precise superiority of these treatments compared to standard care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
传统烧伤治疗药物综述。
考虑到人们对传统疗法的高消费和偏好,以及对这些疗法的有效性缺乏足够的研究,我们旨在回顾有关使用传统和补充医学的文章,重点关注它们如何影响愈合、清创和增生性疤痕。在这项研究中,我们在国际数据库 Pubmed、Google scholar、Ovid、Scopus、web of science 和 Cochrane library 以及波斯语数据库 SID、Magiran、Iranmedex 和 Irandoc 中进行了文献检索。检索到的结果由三位作者根据纳入和排除标准进行筛选,筛选过程以 PRISMA 框架流程图表示。共纳入 22 项研究。19项研究的评估结果为伤口愈合,5项研究的评估结果为疼痛控制,4项研究的评估结果为瘙痒,2项研究的评估结果为疤痕外观。与普通疗法相比,所有研究都显示出相同或更好的效果。芦荟、积雪草和白花蛇舌草是最常见的植物。我们发现,传统医学对烧伤创面治疗很有益处,但传统医学中使用的成分多种多样,因此需要进一步开展前瞻性对照研究,以评估这些疗法与标准疗法相比的确切优越性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
535
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.
期刊最新文献
Cytokine storm in a massively burned pediatric patient. Scientific production on electrical burns: a bibliometric analysis (1946-2023). Carbohydrate and wound healing in critically ill burn patients: A retrospective cohort study. A Pilot Study on the Impact of Smoking on Adipose Derived Stem Cell Function in Burn Patients. Challenges in Geographic Access to Specialized Pediatric Burn Care in the United States.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1