Outcome of a 3-day vs 7-day selective digestive tract decontamination–based regimen for oral antibiotic bowel decontamination in left-sided colorectal surgery: A noninferiority study

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.gassur.2024.07.031
Ulrich Wirth , Josefine Schardey , Thomas von Ahnen , Alexander Crispin , Alina Kappenberger , Petra Zimmermann , Kühn Florian , Jan G. D‘Haese , Jens Werner , Bettina Rau
{"title":"Outcome of a 3-day vs 7-day selective digestive tract decontamination–based regimen for oral antibiotic bowel decontamination in left-sided colorectal surgery: A noninferiority study","authors":"Ulrich Wirth ,&nbsp;Josefine Schardey ,&nbsp;Thomas von Ahnen ,&nbsp;Alexander Crispin ,&nbsp;Alina Kappenberger ,&nbsp;Petra Zimmermann ,&nbsp;Kühn Florian ,&nbsp;Jan G. D‘Haese ,&nbsp;Jens Werner ,&nbsp;Bettina Rau","doi":"10.1016/j.gassur.2024.07.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Colorectal surgery still experiences high rates of infectious complications, such as anastomotic leakage (AL) and surgical site infections (SSIs). Therefore, oral antibiotic bowel decontamination (OABD) has experienced a renaissance. However, data on perioperative selective digestive tract decontamination (SDD)–based regimens or combined bowel preparation are inconsistent. Nonetheless, with widespread use of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery concepts, the ideal length for perioperative SDD treatment has to be reconsidered.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Perioperative outcome was analyzed in a cohort of patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery for left-sided colorectal cancer in a retrospective study. Additional to usual perioperative outcome measures, including AL, SSIs, and overall infectious complications, the efficacy of a shortened 3-day perioperative OABD treatment was compared with the efficacy of a 7-day perioperative OABD treatment based on a noninferiority analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, 256 patients were included into analysis, of whom 84 and 172 patients were treated by 3-day and 7-day perioperative OABD regimens, respectively. AL occurred in 1.2% of patients in the 3-day group and 5.2% of patients in the 7-day group, and SSIs occurred in 3.6% of patients in the 3-day group and 5.8% of patients in the 7-day group, without significant difference. The shortened 3-day perioperative SDD-based regimen was noninferior to the regular 7-day perioperative SDD-based regimen concerning the rates of AL, SSIs, and infectious complications.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our data demonstrated noninferiority of a shortened 3-day SDD-based treatment vs a 7-day SDD-based treatment for AL, SSIs, and overall infectious complications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15893,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":"28 10","pages":"Pages 1665-1673"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1091255X24005699","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Colorectal surgery still experiences high rates of infectious complications, such as anastomotic leakage (AL) and surgical site infections (SSIs). Therefore, oral antibiotic bowel decontamination (OABD) has experienced a renaissance. However, data on perioperative selective digestive tract decontamination (SDD)–based regimens or combined bowel preparation are inconsistent. Nonetheless, with widespread use of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery concepts, the ideal length for perioperative SDD treatment has to be reconsidered.

Methods

Perioperative outcome was analyzed in a cohort of patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery for left-sided colorectal cancer in a retrospective study. Additional to usual perioperative outcome measures, including AL, SSIs, and overall infectious complications, the efficacy of a shortened 3-day perioperative OABD treatment was compared with the efficacy of a 7-day perioperative OABD treatment based on a noninferiority analysis.

Results

Overall, 256 patients were included into analysis, of whom 84 and 172 patients were treated by 3-day and 7-day perioperative OABD regimens, respectively. AL occurred in 1.2% of patients in the 3-day group and 5.2% of patients in the 7-day group, and SSIs occurred in 3.6% of patients in the 3-day group and 5.8% of patients in the 7-day group, without significant difference. The shortened 3-day perioperative SDD-based regimen was noninferior to the regular 7-day perioperative SDD-based regimen concerning the rates of AL, SSIs, and infectious complications.

Conclusion

Our data demonstrated noninferiority of a shortened 3-day SDD-based treatment vs a 7-day SDD-based treatment for AL, SSIs, and overall infectious complications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
左侧结直肠手术中口服抗生素肠道净化 3 天与 7 天 SDD 方案的结果:非劣效性研究。
背景:结肠直肠手术的感染并发症发生率仍然很高,如吻合口漏和手术部位感染。因此,口服抗生素肠道净化疗法重新兴起。但关于围手术期选择性消化道净化(SDD)方案或联合肠道准备的数据并不一致。尽管如此,随着术后增强恢复概念的广泛应用,围手术期选择性消化道净化治疗的理想时间必须重新考虑:方法:在一项回顾性研究中,对一组接受微创手术治疗左侧结直肠癌的患者的围手术期结果进行了分析。除了通常的围手术期结果测量吻合口漏、手术部位感染和总体感染并发症外,还根据非劣效性分析比较了术后3天缩短围手术期口服抗生素肠道净化治疗与术后7天治疗方案的疗效:共有256名患者纳入分析,其中84名患者接受了为期3天的围手术期口服抗生素肠道净化治疗,172名患者接受了为期7天的围手术期口服抗生素肠道净化治疗。3 天组和 7 天组分别有 1.2% 和 5.2% 的患者发生吻合口漏,手术部位感染的比例分别为 3.6% 和 5.8%,差异不大。就吻合口渗漏、手术部位感染和感染性并发症的发生率而言,围手术期缩短 3 天的 SDD 方案不劣于常规的 7 天 SDD 方案:这些数据首次证明,在吻合口渗漏、手术部位感染和总体感染并发症方面,缩短 3 天的围手术期 SDD 治疗方案与 7 天的治疗方案相比并无劣势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.10%
发文量
319
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery is a scholarly, peer-reviewed journal that updates the surgeon on the latest developments in gastrointestinal surgery. The journal includes original articles on surgery of the digestive tract; gastrointestinal images; "How I Do It" articles, subject reviews, book reports, editorial columns, the SSAT Presidential Address, articles by a guest orator, symposia, letters, results of conferences and more. This is the official publication of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract. The journal functions as an outstanding forum for continuing education in surgery and diseases of the gastrointestinal tract.
期刊最新文献
Analyzing the Interaction between Time to Surgery and Tumor Burden Score in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Castleman disease masquerading as a retroperitoneal mass with dense calcification. Invited Commentary on: Thrombosis and Anticoagulation after Portal Vein Resection During Pancreatic Surgery - A Systematic Review. Is end-to-end or side-to-end anastomotic configuration associated with risk of positive intraoperative air leak test in left-sided colon and rectal resections for colon and rectal cancers? Postoperative skeletal muscle loss as a prognostic indicator of clinical outcomes in patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1