Hip Displacement After Triradiate Closure in Ambulatory Cerebral Palsy: Who Needs Continued Surveillance?

IF 1.4 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1097/BPO.0000000000002783
Amelia M Lindgren, Ali Asma, Kenneth J Rogers, Freeman Miller, M Wade Shrader, Jason J Howard
{"title":"Hip Displacement After Triradiate Closure in Ambulatory Cerebral Palsy: Who Needs Continued Surveillance?","authors":"Amelia M Lindgren, Ali Asma, Kenneth J Rogers, Freeman Miller, M Wade Shrader, Jason J Howard","doi":"10.1097/BPO.0000000000002783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hip surveillance in cerebral palsy (CP) is an accepted practice with evidence-based guidelines implemented. For the skeletally immature with open triradiate cartilage (TRC), recommendations for radiographic surveillance stemmed from population-based studies. For nonambulatory CP, progression of hip displacement after skeletal maturity has been reported; less is known for ambulatory CP. We aimed to determine the prevalence and risk factors associated with progressive hip displacement after TRC closure, a proxy for skeletal maturity, for ambulatory CP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with ambulatory CP (Gross Motor Function Classification System I-III), with unilateral or bilateral involvement, hypertonic motor type, regular hip surveillance (≥3 radiographs after age 10 yr, 1 before TRC closure, ≥1 after age 16 yr), and 2-year follow-up post-TRC closure. The primary outcome was migration percentage (MP). Other variables included previous preventative/reconstructive surgery, topographic pattern, sex, scoliosis, epilepsy, and ventriculoperitoneal shunt. An \"unsuccessful hip\" was defined by MP ≥30%, MP progression ≥10%, and/or requiring reconstructive surgery after TRC closure. Statistical analyses included chi-square and multivariate Cox regression. Kaplan-Meier survivorship curves were also determined. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to determine the MP threshold for progression to an \"unsuccessful hip\" after TRC closure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-six patients (39.5% female) met the inclusion criteria, mean follow-up 4.7±2.1 years after TRC closure. Sixteen (21.1%) patients had an unsuccessful hip outcome. By chi-square analysis, diplegia (P=0.002) and epilepsy (P=0.04) were risk factors for an unsuccessful hip. By multivariate analysis, only first MP after TRC closure (P<0.001) was a significant risk factor for progression to an unsuccessful hip; MP ≥28% being the determined threshold (receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, area under curve: 0.845, P<0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The risk of MP progression after skeletal maturity is relatively high (21%), similar to nonambulatory CP. Annual hip surveillance radiographs after TRC closure should continue for Gross Motor Function Classification System I-III with an MP ≥28% after TRC closure, especially for bilateral CP and epilepsy.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III.</p>","PeriodicalId":16945,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000002783","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hip surveillance in cerebral palsy (CP) is an accepted practice with evidence-based guidelines implemented. For the skeletally immature with open triradiate cartilage (TRC), recommendations for radiographic surveillance stemmed from population-based studies. For nonambulatory CP, progression of hip displacement after skeletal maturity has been reported; less is known for ambulatory CP. We aimed to determine the prevalence and risk factors associated with progressive hip displacement after TRC closure, a proxy for skeletal maturity, for ambulatory CP.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with ambulatory CP (Gross Motor Function Classification System I-III), with unilateral or bilateral involvement, hypertonic motor type, regular hip surveillance (≥3 radiographs after age 10 yr, 1 before TRC closure, ≥1 after age 16 yr), and 2-year follow-up post-TRC closure. The primary outcome was migration percentage (MP). Other variables included previous preventative/reconstructive surgery, topographic pattern, sex, scoliosis, epilepsy, and ventriculoperitoneal shunt. An "unsuccessful hip" was defined by MP ≥30%, MP progression ≥10%, and/or requiring reconstructive surgery after TRC closure. Statistical analyses included chi-square and multivariate Cox regression. Kaplan-Meier survivorship curves were also determined. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to determine the MP threshold for progression to an "unsuccessful hip" after TRC closure.

Results: Seventy-six patients (39.5% female) met the inclusion criteria, mean follow-up 4.7±2.1 years after TRC closure. Sixteen (21.1%) patients had an unsuccessful hip outcome. By chi-square analysis, diplegia (P=0.002) and epilepsy (P=0.04) were risk factors for an unsuccessful hip. By multivariate analysis, only first MP after TRC closure (P<0.001) was a significant risk factor for progression to an unsuccessful hip; MP ≥28% being the determined threshold (receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, area under curve: 0.845, P<0.02).

Conclusions: The risk of MP progression after skeletal maturity is relatively high (21%), similar to nonambulatory CP. Annual hip surveillance radiographs after TRC closure should continue for Gross Motor Function Classification System I-III with an MP ≥28% after TRC closure, especially for bilateral CP and epilepsy.

Level of evidence: III.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
活动型脑瘫患者三椎体闭合后的髋关节移位:谁需要继续监测?
背景:脑性瘫痪(CP)患者的髋关节监测已成为一种公认的做法,并实施了循证指南。对于骨骼尚未发育成熟、三桡侧软骨(TRC)开放的患者,放射学监测的建议源于基于人群的研究。对于非卧床 CP,骨骼成熟后髋关节移位的进展已有报道;而对于卧床 CP,了解较少。我们的目的是确定非卧床 CP 在 TRC 关闭(骨骼成熟的代表)后髋关节逐渐移位的发生率和相关风险因素:这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象为非卧床 CP 患者(粗大运动功能分类系统 I-III),单侧或双侧受累,高张力运动类型,定期进行髋关节监测(10 岁后≥3 次 X 光检查,TRC 闭合前 1 次,16 岁后≥1 次),TRC 闭合后随访 2 年。主要结果是迁移百分比(MP)。其他变量包括既往预防性/重建性手术、地形模式、性别、脊柱侧凸、癫痫和脑室腹腔分流。髋关节 "不成功 "的定义是:MP≥30%,MP进展≥10%,和/或TRC关闭后需要进行重建手术。统计分析包括卡方检验和多变量考克斯回归。此外,还测定了 Kaplan-Meier 生存曲线。接收器操作特征分析用于确定TRC闭合后进展为 "不成功髋关节 "的MP阈值:76名患者(39.5%为女性)符合纳入标准,TRC闭合后平均随访时间为4.7±2.1年。16例(21.1%)患者髋关节手术失败。通过卡方分析,偏瘫(P=0.002)和癫痫(P=0.04)是髋关节手术不成功的风险因素。通过多变量分析,只有 TRC 关闭后的首次 MP(PConclusions:骨骼成熟后髋臼发育不良的风险相对较高(21%),与不行动的 CP 相似。对于 TRC 关闭后 MP ≥28% 的粗大运动功能分级系统 I-III 患者,尤其是双侧 CP 和癫痫患者,应在 TRC 关闭后继续每年进行髋关节监测拍片:证据等级:III。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
17.60%
发文量
512
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: ​Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics is a leading journal that focuses specifically on traumatic injuries to give you hands-on on coverage of a fast-growing field. You''ll get articles that cover everything from the nature of injury to the effects of new drug therapies; everything from recommendations for more effective surgical approaches to the latest laboratory findings.
期刊最新文献
ChatGPT Responses to Common Questions About Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: Correspondence. Anterior Distal Femoral Hemiepiphysiodesis Using Coronally Oriented 8-plates for the Correction of Fixed Knee Flexion Deformities in Children-Preliminary Results. Epidemiology of Pediatric Firearm Injuries in the United States: The Progression of Gunshot Injury Rates Through the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic. Risk of Acute Compartment Syndrome in Pediatric Patients With Tibial Tubercle Avulsion Fractures: A Retrospective Review. Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging Protocol: An Effective and Useful Tool to Assess Discoid Lateral Meniscus Instability in Children.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1