Penicillin concentrations in bone and subcutaneous tissue: A porcine microdialysis study comparing oral and intravenous treatment

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Orthopaedic Research® Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1002/jor.25947
Hans Christian Rasmussen, Pelle Hanberg, Johanne G. Lilleøre, Elisabeth K. Petersen, Magnus A. Hvistendahl, Andrea R. Jørgensen, Maiken Stilling, Mats Bue
{"title":"Penicillin concentrations in bone and subcutaneous tissue: A porcine microdialysis study comparing oral and intravenous treatment","authors":"Hans Christian Rasmussen,&nbsp;Pelle Hanberg,&nbsp;Johanne G. Lilleøre,&nbsp;Elisabeth K. Petersen,&nbsp;Magnus A. Hvistendahl,&nbsp;Andrea R. Jørgensen,&nbsp;Maiken Stilling,&nbsp;Mats Bue","doi":"10.1002/jor.25947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Penicillin is available in both an oral (penicillin V) and intravenous formulation (penicillin G), theoretically allowing for a safe transition between the two. However, the use of oral penicillin remains a topic of debate due to low and variable bioavailability. This study aimed to assess the time for which the free penicillin concentration exceeded targeted minimum inhibitory concentrations for <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> and <i>Streptococcus</i> species (0.125, 0.25, and 0.5 mg/L) in cancellous bone and subcutaneous tissue after intravenous penicillin and oral penicillin administration. 12 female pigs (68–75 kg) were assigned, according to local standard clinical regimes, to either intravenous penicillin (1.2 g) or oral penicillin (0.8 g) treatment every 6 h over an 18 h period. Microdialysis catheters were placed for sampling in tibial cancellous bone and adjacent subcutaneous tissue. Data was dynamic/continually collected in the first dosing interval (0–6 h), simulating a prophylactic situation, and the third dosing interval (12–18 h), simulating a therapeutic setting. Plasma samples were collected for reference. For all investigated targets, intravenous treatment resulted in a longer mean time above relevant minimum inhibitory concentrations in cancellous bone during the first dosing interval, and in both cancellous bone and subcutaneous tissue during the third dosing interval compared to oral treatment. With clinically relevant dosing, intravenous penicillin provides superior exposure compared to oral penicillin in both a prophylactic and therapeutic setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":16650,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®","volume":"42 12","pages":"2844-2851"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jor.25947","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jor.25947","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Penicillin is available in both an oral (penicillin V) and intravenous formulation (penicillin G), theoretically allowing for a safe transition between the two. However, the use of oral penicillin remains a topic of debate due to low and variable bioavailability. This study aimed to assess the time for which the free penicillin concentration exceeded targeted minimum inhibitory concentrations for Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus species (0.125, 0.25, and 0.5 mg/L) in cancellous bone and subcutaneous tissue after intravenous penicillin and oral penicillin administration. 12 female pigs (68–75 kg) were assigned, according to local standard clinical regimes, to either intravenous penicillin (1.2 g) or oral penicillin (0.8 g) treatment every 6 h over an 18 h period. Microdialysis catheters were placed for sampling in tibial cancellous bone and adjacent subcutaneous tissue. Data was dynamic/continually collected in the first dosing interval (0–6 h), simulating a prophylactic situation, and the third dosing interval (12–18 h), simulating a therapeutic setting. Plasma samples were collected for reference. For all investigated targets, intravenous treatment resulted in a longer mean time above relevant minimum inhibitory concentrations in cancellous bone during the first dosing interval, and in both cancellous bone and subcutaneous tissue during the third dosing interval compared to oral treatment. With clinically relevant dosing, intravenous penicillin provides superior exposure compared to oral penicillin in both a prophylactic and therapeutic setting.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
骨骼和皮下组织中的青霉素浓度:一项比较口服和静脉注射治疗的猪微透析研究。
青霉素既有口服制剂(青霉素 V),也有静脉注射制剂(青霉素 G),理论上可以在两者之间安全转换。然而,由于口服青霉素的生物利用度较低且不稳定,其使用仍是一个争论不休的话题。本研究旨在评估静脉注射青霉素和口服青霉素后,松质骨和皮下组织中游离青霉素浓度超过金黄色葡萄球菌和链球菌最低抑制浓度目标值(0.125、0.25 和 0.5 mg/L)的时间。根据当地的标准临床方案,12 头雌性猪(68-75 千克)被分配到静脉注射青霉素(1.2 克)或口服青霉素(0.8 克)治疗方案中,每 6 小时注射一次,持续 18 小时。在胫骨松质骨和邻近皮下组织放置微透析导管进行采样。在模拟预防情况的第一个给药间隔(0-6 小时)和模拟治疗情况的第三个给药间隔(12-18 小时)内动态/连续收集数据。采集血浆样本作为参考。对于所有研究目标,与口服治疗相比,在第一个给药间隔期间,静脉注射治疗导致松质骨中超过相关最低抑制浓度的平均时间更长,而在第三个给药间隔期间,松质骨和皮下组织中超过相关最低抑制浓度的平均时间更长。与口服青霉素相比,在临床相关剂量下,静脉注射青霉素在预防和治疗方面都能提供更好的暴露效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Research®
Journal of Orthopaedic Research® 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
261
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic Research is the forum for the rapid publication of high quality reports of new information on the full spectrum of orthopaedic research, including life sciences, engineering, translational, and clinical studies.
期刊最新文献
Synovial fluid dual-biomarker algorithm accurately differentiates osteoarthritis from inflammatory arthritis. Correction to "Optical Spectroscopic Determination of Human Meniscus Composition". Bilateral waveform analysis of gait biomechanics presurgery to 12 months following ACL reconstruction compared to controls. Issue Information - Cover Issue Information - Editorial Board and TOC
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1