Predicting future medical needs and mortality risk in geriatric long-term care patients : Development and validation of the Nascher score and revised Nascher score.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1007/s00508-024-02410-9
Thomas E Dorner, Michael Smeikal, Matthias Unseld, Christoph Gisinger
{"title":"Predicting future medical needs and mortality risk in geriatric long-term care patients : Development and validation of the Nascher score and revised Nascher score.","authors":"Thomas E Dorner, Michael Smeikal, Matthias Unseld, Christoph Gisinger","doi":"10.1007/s00508-024-02410-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Choosing the right intensity of medical care is a huge challenge particularly in long-term geriatric care. The Nascher score was developed to assess future medical care needs. The aim of this study was to determine whether the Nascher score and a revised version can predict future medical needs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, 396 residents in long-term care hospitals, who were admitted over a period of two years and followed up to two and a half yeare, were analysed. Outcome parameters were: (1) number of medication changes, (2) number of ward doctor documentations and (3) number of acute illnesses treated with antibiotics, and mortality risk. Based on the first results, an alternative scoring of the Nascher score with 12 instead of 26 items was developed, called the revised Nascher score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Nascher score significantly correlated with the number of medication changes, the number of ward doctor documentations, and the number of acute ilnesses treated with antibiotics with Spearman correlation coefficients of 0.30, 0.26, and 0.15, respectively. The revised Nascher score showed a higher correlation with correlation coefficients of 0.36, 0.26, and 0.21, respectively. Residents with a Nascher score in the highest quartile had a significantly higher mortality risk than residents in the lowest quartile (hazard ratio, HR 2.97, 95% confidence interval, CI 1.80-4.34). The corresponding values for the revised Nascher score were HR 3.03, 95% CI 2.03-4.54 in the highest and HR 1.80, 95% CI 1.24-2.60 in the middle quartiles.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Nascher score and even more so the revised Nascher score are well suited to predicting the various parameters of future medical needs and mortality risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":23861,"journal":{"name":"Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11390801/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-024-02410-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Choosing the right intensity of medical care is a huge challenge particularly in long-term geriatric care. The Nascher score was developed to assess future medical care needs. The aim of this study was to determine whether the Nascher score and a revised version can predict future medical needs.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 396 residents in long-term care hospitals, who were admitted over a period of two years and followed up to two and a half yeare, were analysed. Outcome parameters were: (1) number of medication changes, (2) number of ward doctor documentations and (3) number of acute illnesses treated with antibiotics, and mortality risk. Based on the first results, an alternative scoring of the Nascher score with 12 instead of 26 items was developed, called the revised Nascher score.

Results: The Nascher score significantly correlated with the number of medication changes, the number of ward doctor documentations, and the number of acute ilnesses treated with antibiotics with Spearman correlation coefficients of 0.30, 0.26, and 0.15, respectively. The revised Nascher score showed a higher correlation with correlation coefficients of 0.36, 0.26, and 0.21, respectively. Residents with a Nascher score in the highest quartile had a significantly higher mortality risk than residents in the lowest quartile (hazard ratio, HR 2.97, 95% confidence interval, CI 1.80-4.34). The corresponding values for the revised Nascher score were HR 3.03, 95% CI 2.03-4.54 in the highest and HR 1.80, 95% CI 1.24-2.60 in the middle quartiles.

Conclusion: The Nascher score and even more so the revised Nascher score are well suited to predicting the various parameters of future medical needs and mortality risk.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测老年长期护理患者的未来医疗需求和死亡风险 :纳舍尔评分和修订版纳舍尔评分的开发与验证。
背景:选择合适的医疗护理强度是一项巨大的挑战,尤其是在长期老年护理方面。Nascher 评分是用来评估未来医疗护理需求的。本研究旨在确定纳舍尔评分和修订版是否能预测未来的医疗需求:在这项回顾性队列研究中,对长期护理医院的 396 名住院患者进行了分析,这些患者入院两年,随访两年半。研究结果参数包括(1) 换药次数;(2) 病房医生记录次数;(3) 使用抗生素治疗的急性病次数以及死亡风险。在第一批结果的基础上,开发了纳舍尔评分的替代评分方法,将 26 个项目改为 12 个,称为修订版纳舍尔评分:结果:纳舍尔评分与换药次数、病房医生记录次数和使用抗生素治疗的急性病次数明显相关,斯皮尔曼相关系数分别为 0.30、0.26 和 0.15。修订后的纳舍尔评分显示出更高的相关性,相关系数分别为 0.36、0.26 和 0.21。纳舍尔评分处于最高四分位数的住院患者的死亡风险明显高于处于最低四分位数的住院患者(危险比,HR 2.97,95% 置信区间,CI 1.80-4.34)。修订后的纳舍尔评分的相应值分别为:最高四分位数 HR 3.03,95% 置信区间 CI 2.03-4.54;中间四分位数 HR 1.80,95% 置信区间 CI 1.24-2.60:纳舍尔评分,尤其是修订版纳舍尔评分,非常适合预测未来医疗需求和死亡风险的各种参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift
Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
110
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Wiener klinische Wochenschrift - The Central European Journal of Medicine - is an international scientific medical journal covering the entire spectrum of clinical medicine and related areas such as ethics in medicine, public health and the history of medicine. In addition to original articles, the Journal features editorials and leading articles on newly emerging topics, review articles, case reports and a broad range of special articles. Experimental material will be considered for publication if it is directly relevant to clinical medicine. The number of international contributions has been steadily increasing. Consequently, the international reputation of the journal has grown in the past several years. Founded in 1888, the Wiener klinische Wochenschrift - The Central European Journal of Medicine - is certainly one of the most prestigious medical journals in the world and takes pride in having been the first publisher of landmarks in medicine.
期刊最新文献
Gastrointestinal function and pain outcomes following segmental resection or discoid resection for low rectal endometriosis. Olfaction and thyroid hormones in patients with subjective cognitive decline, non-amnestic and amnestic mild cognitive impairment Neurofibromatosis type 1 adult surveillance form for Austria COVID-19 vaccines: anaphylaxis and anxiety Deciphering the role of lactate as a prognostic indicator in pediatric diabetic ketoacidosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1