Efficacy of Cognitive Stimulation Therapy for Cognition in Patients with Vascular Cognitive Impairment: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 1.1 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL KEIO JOURNAL OF MEDICINE Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI:10.2302/kjm.2022-0030-OA
Naoki Mori, Yohei Otaka, Daisuke Ito, Ayaka Shimizu, Ayako Narita, Kaoru Honaga, Daisuke Matsuura, Kunitsugu Kondo, Meigen Liu, Tetsuya Tsuji
{"title":"Efficacy of Cognitive Stimulation Therapy for Cognition in Patients with Vascular Cognitive Impairment: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Naoki Mori, Yohei Otaka, Daisuke Ito, Ayaka Shimizu, Ayako Narita, Kaoru Honaga, Daisuke Matsuura, Kunitsugu Kondo, Meigen Liu, Tetsuya Tsuji","doi":"10.2302/kjm.2022-0030-OA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The efficacy of cognitive stimulation therapy (CST) in patients with vascular cognitive impairment has not been explored, and no studies investigating CST in the convalescent rehabilitation phase have been reported. This study examined the effect of CST on the cognitive function of patients with vascular cognitive impairment. A randomized controlled, assessor-blinded, single-centered trial with two parallel groups was conducted in a convalescent rehabilitation hospital. Twenty participants were randomly allocated to CST (n=10) and control (n=10) groups. Participants in the CST group underwent two CST sessions a day, five times a week for 8 weeks, in addition to conventional rehabilitation. Participants in the control group underwent conventional rehabilitation only. The primary outcome was the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score, and the outcome between the groups was compared using a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM). The mean (standard deviation) scores of MMSE increased by 3.50 (3.08) points and 4.50 (1.61) points from baseline to the end of the study (week 8) in the CST and control groups, respectively. The GLMM showed a significant effect of TIME on MMSE (F=21.121, P<0.001), whereas no significant effect on MMSE was observed for GROUP (intervention vs. control, P=0.817) or the interaction term (TIME×GROUP, P=0.649). Although a significant improvement in cognitive function was observed in each group, no significant effect of CST was evident. This result indicates that the effect may have been masked by improvements caused by natural history or rehabilitation. Future studies with a sufficient sample size are required to confirm the findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":46245,"journal":{"name":"KEIO JOURNAL OF MEDICINE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KEIO JOURNAL OF MEDICINE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2302/kjm.2022-0030-OA","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The efficacy of cognitive stimulation therapy (CST) in patients with vascular cognitive impairment has not been explored, and no studies investigating CST in the convalescent rehabilitation phase have been reported. This study examined the effect of CST on the cognitive function of patients with vascular cognitive impairment. A randomized controlled, assessor-blinded, single-centered trial with two parallel groups was conducted in a convalescent rehabilitation hospital. Twenty participants were randomly allocated to CST (n=10) and control (n=10) groups. Participants in the CST group underwent two CST sessions a day, five times a week for 8 weeks, in addition to conventional rehabilitation. Participants in the control group underwent conventional rehabilitation only. The primary outcome was the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score, and the outcome between the groups was compared using a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM). The mean (standard deviation) scores of MMSE increased by 3.50 (3.08) points and 4.50 (1.61) points from baseline to the end of the study (week 8) in the CST and control groups, respectively. The GLMM showed a significant effect of TIME on MMSE (F=21.121, P<0.001), whereas no significant effect on MMSE was observed for GROUP (intervention vs. control, P=0.817) or the interaction term (TIME×GROUP, P=0.649). Although a significant improvement in cognitive function was observed in each group, no significant effect of CST was evident. This result indicates that the effect may have been masked by improvements caused by natural history or rehabilitation. Future studies with a sufficient sample size are required to confirm the findings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认知刺激疗法对血管性认知障碍患者认知的疗效:随机对照试验》。
认知刺激疗法(CST)对血管性认知障碍患者的疗效尚未得到探讨,也没有关于 CST 在康复疗养阶段的研究报告。本研究探讨了 CST 对血管性认知障碍患者认知功能的影响。在一家疗养康复医院进行了一项随机对照、评估者盲法、单中心试验,分为两个平行组。20 名参与者被随机分配到 CST 组(10 人)和对照组(10 人)。CST组的参与者在常规康复治疗的基础上,每天接受两次CST治疗,每周5次,为期8周。对照组的参与者只接受常规康复治疗。主要结果为迷你精神状态检查(MMSE)得分,组间结果采用广义线性混合模型(GLMM)进行比较。从基线到研究结束(第 8 周),CST 组和对照组的 MMSE 平均分(标准差)分别提高了 3.50 (3.08) 分和 4.50 (1.61) 分。GLMM 显示,时间对 MMSE 有显著影响(F=21.121,P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
KEIO JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
KEIO JOURNAL OF MEDICINE MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Intravenous Regeneration-associated Cell Transplantation Enhances Tissue Recovery in Mice with Acute Ischemic Stroke. Warfarin Therapy and Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure for a Patient with Atrial Fibrillation and Antithrombin-III Deficiency. Efficacy of Cognitive Stimulation Therapy for Cognition in Patients with Vascular Cognitive Impairment: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Robotic Lobectomy with a Single Robotic Stapler from One 12-mm Port: A Multi-institutional Study. Incidence of Radiation-induced Nausea and Vomiting: A Prospective Single-institution Pilot Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1