Desarrollo y consenso de un cuadro de mando para evaluar la actividad investigadora en los servicios de farmacia hospitalaria en España

IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.farma.2023.12.007
Vicente Escudero-Vilaplana , Ana Belén Guisado-Gil , Bernardo Santos-Ramos , Ana Herranz
{"title":"Desarrollo y consenso de un cuadro de mando para evaluar la actividad investigadora en los servicios de farmacia hospitalaria en España","authors":"Vicente Escudero-Vilaplana ,&nbsp;Ana Belén Guisado-Gil ,&nbsp;Bernardo Santos-Ramos ,&nbsp;Ana Herranz","doi":"10.1016/j.farma.2023.12.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To develop by consensus a dashboard model to standardize and promote the evaluation of research activity in Spanish Hospital Pharmacy Services.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study was carried out in 5 phases following the modified Delphi methodology: constitution of the coordinating group, elaboration of a list of scenarios, selection of participating centers, evaluation of the list of scenarios, and analysis of the results.</p><p>The coordinating group designed a questionnaire with 114 questions. General research questions and different scenarios (indicators) were included to form the dashboard. The Hospital Pharmacy Services with the highest number of publications were identified to participate in the Delphi consultation. Two rounds of consultations were conducted in which the \"Need\" and/or \"Feasibility\" of their measurement was evaluated for each of the scenarios, using a numerical scale from 1 (lowest score) to 9 (highest score).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Sixteen Hospital Pharmacy Services, belonging to 8 different autonomous communities, participated in the Delphi consultation. A total of 100% of them responded to all the questions in the 2 rounds of consultations. It was considered that the Hospital Pharmacy Services should have a research dashboard (need = 100%) with a basic structure and a common minimum set of data for all them (need = 87.5%). The consensus was reached on distinguishing research projects led by the Hospital Pharmacy Services from those led by other groups in which the Hospital Pharmacy Services collaborate (need = 87.5%), and a definition was approved on the leadership of these projects according to whether they are single-center or multicenter.</p><p>A consensus was reached on 40 indicators to form the dashboard, which evaluates publications (13 indicators), human resources (12 indicators), research projects (9 indicators), doctoral theses (4 indicators), and patents and intellectual property registrations (2 indicators).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This is the first consensus dashboard developed to evaluate the research activity of the Hospital Pharmacy Services, which will help to analyze the productivity and impact of research systematically and continuously. In addition, it will allow comparison between them and will help to establish synergies and identify trends, patterns, and challenges.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45860,"journal":{"name":"FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130634324000072/pdfft?md5=79cd688149ef5c0a14b71edf5c88c802&pid=1-s2.0-S1130634324000072-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130634324000072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To develop by consensus a dashboard model to standardize and promote the evaluation of research activity in Spanish Hospital Pharmacy Services.

Methods

The study was carried out in 5 phases following the modified Delphi methodology: constitution of the coordinating group, elaboration of a list of scenarios, selection of participating centers, evaluation of the list of scenarios, and analysis of the results.

The coordinating group designed a questionnaire with 114 questions. General research questions and different scenarios (indicators) were included to form the dashboard. The Hospital Pharmacy Services with the highest number of publications were identified to participate in the Delphi consultation. Two rounds of consultations were conducted in which the "Need" and/or "Feasibility" of their measurement was evaluated for each of the scenarios, using a numerical scale from 1 (lowest score) to 9 (highest score).

Results

Sixteen Hospital Pharmacy Services, belonging to 8 different autonomous communities, participated in the Delphi consultation. A total of 100% of them responded to all the questions in the 2 rounds of consultations. It was considered that the Hospital Pharmacy Services should have a research dashboard (need = 100%) with a basic structure and a common minimum set of data for all them (need = 87.5%). The consensus was reached on distinguishing research projects led by the Hospital Pharmacy Services from those led by other groups in which the Hospital Pharmacy Services collaborate (need = 87.5%), and a definition was approved on the leadership of these projects according to whether they are single-center or multicenter.

A consensus was reached on 40 indicators to form the dashboard, which evaluates publications (13 indicators), human resources (12 indicators), research projects (9 indicators), doctoral theses (4 indicators), and patents and intellectual property registrations (2 indicators).

Conclusions

This is the first consensus dashboard developed to evaluate the research activity of the Hospital Pharmacy Services, which will help to analyze the productivity and impact of research systematically and continuously. In addition, it will allow comparison between them and will help to establish synergies and identify trends, patterns, and challenges.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发用于评估西班牙医院药房服务研究活动的仪表板模型并达成共识。
目的在协商一致的基础上建立一个仪表板模型,以规范和促进对西班牙医院药学服务研究活动的评估:这项研究按照修改后的德尔菲方法分 5 个阶段进行:成立协调小组、拟定方案清单、选择参与中心、评估方案清单和分析结果。协调小组设计了一份包含 114 个问题的调查问卷。一般研究问题和不同的情景(指标)被纳入其中,形成仪表板。确定了发表论文数量最多的医院药学服务机构参与德尔菲咨询。在两轮磋商中,采用从 1 分(最低分)到 9 分(最高分)的数字量表,对每种情景的衡量 "必要性 "和/或 "可行性 "进行了评估:隶属于 8 个不同自治区的 16 家医院药房参与了德尔菲咨询。在两轮咨询中,共有 100%的医院药房回答了所有问题。会议认为,医院药学服务处应该有一个研究仪表板(需求 = 100%),其基本结构和最低通用数据集适用于所有医院药学服务处(需求 = 87.5%)。在区分医院药学服务部领导的研究项目和医院药学服务部合作的其他团体领导的研究项目方面达成了共识(需求 = 87.5%),并批准了根据单中心或多中心对这些项目的领导进行定义。对 40 个指标达成了共识,形成了评估出版物(13 个指标)、人力资源(12 个指标)、研究项目(9 个指标)、博士论文(4 个指标)以及专利和知识产权注册(2 个指标)的仪表板:这是首个为评估医院药学服务处研究活动而开发的共识仪表板,有助于系统、持续地分析研究的生产力和影响。此外,该仪表板还可以对各机构的研究活动进行比较,并有助于建立协同作用、确定趋势、模式和挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA
FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
21.40%
发文量
46
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Una gran revista para acceder a los mejores artículos originales y revisiones de la farmacoterapia actual. Además, es Órgano de expresión científica de la Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria, y está indexada en Index Medicus/Medline, EMBASE/Excerpta Médica, Alert, Internacional Pharmaceutical Abstracts y SCOPUS.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of the situation of pharmaceutical care for patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Treatment adherence to oral chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non- small cell lung cancer: Protocol for a hospital pharmacy-based real-world study. Pharmacokinetic-guided switching from standard half-life factor VIII to extended half-life pegylated factor VIII in the therapy of hemophilia A in clinical practice. Prospective observational follow-up study of psychoactive drugs treatment initiated in the intensive care unit. Protocol for the adaptation and consensus of the Community Pharmacy Survey on Patient Safety Culture to hospital pharmacy in Spain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1