Cervical facet joint degeneration, facet joint angle, and paraspinal muscle degeneration are correlated with degenerative cervical spondylolisthesis at C4/5: a propensity score-matched study

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Prior studies have hypothesized that degenerative cervical spondylolisthesis (DCS) may be influenced by loss of stability due to disc, facet joint or cervical alignment. Meanwhile, it is commonly believed that the facet joints and paraspinal muscles participate in maintaining cervical spine stability. However, the impact of paraspinal muscle morphology and detailed facet joint features on DCS requires further investigation.

PURPOSE

To compare facet joint characteristics, disc degeneration and muscle morphology between patients with DCS and those without DCS.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective cohort study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Consecutive surgical patients with degenerative cervical spondylosis from June 2016 to August 2023 were recruited.

OUTCOME MEASURES

DCS was assessed on X-ray based on the translation distance. Cervical facet joint degeneration (CFD), the facet joint angle on the axial plane (FA-A) and the facet joint angle on the sagittal plane (FA-S), and facet joint tropism (FT) were measured on computerized tomography (CT). Paraspinal muscle degeneration was assessed on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including by the adjusted cross-sectional area (aCSA), the functional aCSA, the fat infiltration ratio (FI%). The Pfirrmann grade of the cervical disc was also evaluated.

METHODS

Demographic and clinical data were compared in matched and unmatched cohorts. Disc degeneration, muscle degeneration and facet joint characteristics, including FA, FT and CFD, were compared between patients with and without DCS. Furthermore, the degree of CFD was compared with that of adjacent segments in both groups. Additionally, logistic regression was performed to determine independent risk factors for DCS. Finally, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, area under the curve (AUC) and cutoff value for the risk factors were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 431 surgical patients were propensity score matched for age, sex and BMI, and 146 patients were included in the final analysis, with 73 patients in the DCS group and 73 patients in the non-DCS group. DCS patients exhibited more severe CFD at C4/5 (segment with spondylolisthesis). Additionally, DCS was generally associated with more severe CFD, a more horizontal FA-S, more FT and worse paraspinal muscle health but similar disc degeneration. In addition, anterior spondylolisthesis was related to more severe CFD and decreased functional aCSA of the flexors and extensors. Finally, more severe CFD, a more horizontal FA-S and a higher FI% on deep extensor were revealed to be risk factors for DCS, with cutoff values of 1.5, 44.5̊, and 37.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that CFD, the FA and FT and parasipnal muscle degeneration were associated with DCS. And may provide novel insight into the pathogenesis and nature history of DCS and suggest the evolution of degeneration in the cervical spine.