Stock Inhalers: A Qualitative Data Analysis of Illinois Health Policy Trials and Triumphs

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of School Health Pub Date : 2024-08-04 DOI:10.1111/josh.13500
Jessica Wrona MPH, Paige Hardy MPH, Caroline Youssef MD, MPH, Semmy Adeleke MS, Molly A. Martin MD, MAPP, Lynn B. Gerald PhD, MSPH, Andrea A. Pappalardo MD
{"title":"Stock Inhalers: A Qualitative Data Analysis of Illinois Health Policy Trials and Triumphs","authors":"Jessica Wrona MPH,&nbsp;Paige Hardy MPH,&nbsp;Caroline Youssef MD, MPH,&nbsp;Semmy Adeleke MS,&nbsp;Molly A. Martin MD, MAPP,&nbsp;Lynn B. Gerald PhD, MSPH,&nbsp;Andrea A. Pappalardo MD","doi":"10.1111/josh.13500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Asthma reliever medication access is critical, especially in schools. Policies that “stock” reliever inhalers in schools provide failsafe medication access. This research aims to understand barriers and facilitators to Illinois stock inhaler policy implementation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted 18 semi-structured interviews in 2021-2022 with key school-based and non-school-based partners (school administrators, nurses, governmental agencies, and advocacy leaders). Through Atlas.ti, code frequencies compared (Fisher's exact test), and a thematic analysis performed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Four themes emerged: facilitators, barriers, program rationale, and process considerations. The common facilitators were “Finding a provider,” having a “Champion,” and “Funding”. Barriers included “Not enough school nurses,” “Pharmacy refusal to fill prescriptions,” and “Feeling overwhelmed.” All were supportive of the rationale for stock inhalers. Non-school-based informants (p &lt; .01) were more likely to mention medication donations, while school staff reported having enough nurses as a facilitator (p &lt; .01). School staff reported concerns about children with asthma not having their medication significantly more than other partners (p = .02).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications for School Health Policy, Practice, and Equity</h3>\n \n <p>Our analysis revealed that school partners recognize the value of stock inhalers. Barrier mitigation to support the funding, prescription access and processing, and training are essential to success of stock inhaler programming. Multilevel collaborative efforts through coalitions could be a potential solution.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50059,"journal":{"name":"Journal of School Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/josh.13500","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of School Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/josh.13500","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Asthma reliever medication access is critical, especially in schools. Policies that “stock” reliever inhalers in schools provide failsafe medication access. This research aims to understand barriers and facilitators to Illinois stock inhaler policy implementation.

Methods

We conducted 18 semi-structured interviews in 2021-2022 with key school-based and non-school-based partners (school administrators, nurses, governmental agencies, and advocacy leaders). Through Atlas.ti, code frequencies compared (Fisher's exact test), and a thematic analysis performed.

Results

Four themes emerged: facilitators, barriers, program rationale, and process considerations. The common facilitators were “Finding a provider,” having a “Champion,” and “Funding”. Barriers included “Not enough school nurses,” “Pharmacy refusal to fill prescriptions,” and “Feeling overwhelmed.” All were supportive of the rationale for stock inhalers. Non-school-based informants (p < .01) were more likely to mention medication donations, while school staff reported having enough nurses as a facilitator (p < .01). School staff reported concerns about children with asthma not having their medication significantly more than other partners (p = .02).

Implications for School Health Policy, Practice, and Equity

Our analysis revealed that school partners recognize the value of stock inhalers. Barrier mitigation to support the funding, prescription access and processing, and training are essential to success of stock inhaler programming. Multilevel collaborative efforts through coalitions could be a potential solution.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
库存吸入器:伊利诺伊州卫生政策试验与胜利的定性数据分析》。
背景:获得哮喘缓解药物至关重要,尤其是在学校。在学校 "储备 "缓解吸入器的政策可提供安全可靠的用药途径。本研究旨在了解伊利诺伊州库存吸入器政策实施的障碍和促进因素:2021-2022 年,我们对主要的校方和非校方合作伙伴(学校管理人员、护士、政府机构和倡导领袖)进行了 18 次半结构式访谈。通过 Atlas.ti,比较了代码频率(费雪精确检验),并进行了主题分析:出现了四个主题:促进因素、障碍、计划原理和过程考虑。常见的促进因素是 "找到提供者"、"有倡导者 "和 "资金"。障碍包括 "学校护士人数不足"、"药房拒绝提供处方 "和 "感到力不从心"。所有人都支持库存吸入器的理由。非学校信息提供者(p 对学校卫生政策、实践和公平的影响:我们的分析表明,学校合作伙伴认识到库存吸入器的价值。减少障碍以支持资金、处方的获取和处理以及培训对库存吸入器计划的成功至关重要。通过联盟开展多层次合作可能是一个潜在的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of School Health
Journal of School Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
134
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of School Health is published 12 times a year on behalf of the American School Health Association. It addresses practice, theory, and research related to the health and well-being of school-aged youth. The journal is a top-tiered resource for professionals who work toward providing students with the programs, services, and environment they need for good health and academic success.
期刊最新文献
Primary School Pupils' Perceptions and Experiences of Wearable Technologies. Racial Disparities in a Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program: Abstinence-Only Versus a Comprehensive Sexuality Education Program. National Health Education Standards: Model Guidance for Curriculum and Instruction (Third Edition). Effect of Delaying High School Start Time on Teen Physical Activity, Screen Use, and Sports and Extracurricular Activity Participation: Results From START. Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1