Association of congenital uterine anomaly with abnormal placental cord insertion and adverse pregnancy complications: a retrospective cohort study.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-04 DOI:10.1080/14767058.2024.2382309
Tatsuya Yoshihara, Yasuhiko Okuda, Osamu Yoshino
{"title":"Association of congenital uterine anomaly with abnormal placental cord insertion and adverse pregnancy complications: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Tatsuya Yoshihara, Yasuhiko Okuda, Osamu Yoshino","doi":"10.1080/14767058.2024.2382309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Congenital uterine anomalies during pregnancy increase the risk of pregnancy complications such as miscarriage, preterm delivery, fetal malpresentation, cesarean delivery, and fetal growth restriction. However, few studies have examined uterine anomalies in relation to perinatal complications other than those mentioned above. We investigated the association between pregnancies complicated by congenital uterine anomalies and various perinatal outcomes at our institution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study was conducted from January 2009 to May 2021. We included cases of uterine anomalies, such as septate, bicornuate, unicornuate, and didelphic uterus. First, the perinatal complications and neonatal outcomes were compared between pregnancies complicated by uterine anomalies and those with normal uteri. Second, we conducted an analysis based on the type of uterine anomalies classified into two groups: the minor anomaly group consisted of anomalies limited to the uterine cavity, such as the septate uterus, whereas the major anomaly group included anomalies affecting the uterine shape, such as bicornuate, unicornuate, and didelphic uterus. We compared the incidence of perinatal complications among the major anomaly, minor anomaly, and normal uterus groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 45 pregnancies were complicated with uterine anomalies. The minor anomaly group included 11 patients and the major anomaly group included 34 patients. The incidence of fetal malpresentation was significantly higher in the uterine anomaly group than in the normal uterus group (18% vs. 3.7%, <i>p</i> = .04). Furthermore, the frequency of abnormal placental cord insertion was significantly higher in the uterine anomaly group (16% vs. 3.7%, <i>p</i> = .01). Examination based on the type of uterine anomaly revealed significant differences in cervical incompetence, malpresentation, cesarean section, and abnormal placental cord insertion. Cervical incompetence was more likely in patients with minor anomalies. In contrast, fetal malpresentation, cesarean section, and abnormal placental cord insertion were more likely in the major anomaly group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In addition to the findings reported in previous studies, abnormal placental cord insertion was more frequent in pregnancies complicated by uterine anomalies.</p>","PeriodicalId":50146,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","volume":"37 1","pages":"2382309"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2024.2382309","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Congenital uterine anomalies during pregnancy increase the risk of pregnancy complications such as miscarriage, preterm delivery, fetal malpresentation, cesarean delivery, and fetal growth restriction. However, few studies have examined uterine anomalies in relation to perinatal complications other than those mentioned above. We investigated the association between pregnancies complicated by congenital uterine anomalies and various perinatal outcomes at our institution.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted from January 2009 to May 2021. We included cases of uterine anomalies, such as septate, bicornuate, unicornuate, and didelphic uterus. First, the perinatal complications and neonatal outcomes were compared between pregnancies complicated by uterine anomalies and those with normal uteri. Second, we conducted an analysis based on the type of uterine anomalies classified into two groups: the minor anomaly group consisted of anomalies limited to the uterine cavity, such as the septate uterus, whereas the major anomaly group included anomalies affecting the uterine shape, such as bicornuate, unicornuate, and didelphic uterus. We compared the incidence of perinatal complications among the major anomaly, minor anomaly, and normal uterus groups.

Results: During the study period, 45 pregnancies were complicated with uterine anomalies. The minor anomaly group included 11 patients and the major anomaly group included 34 patients. The incidence of fetal malpresentation was significantly higher in the uterine anomaly group than in the normal uterus group (18% vs. 3.7%, p = .04). Furthermore, the frequency of abnormal placental cord insertion was significantly higher in the uterine anomaly group (16% vs. 3.7%, p = .01). Examination based on the type of uterine anomaly revealed significant differences in cervical incompetence, malpresentation, cesarean section, and abnormal placental cord insertion. Cervical incompetence was more likely in patients with minor anomalies. In contrast, fetal malpresentation, cesarean section, and abnormal placental cord insertion were more likely in the major anomaly group.

Conclusions: In addition to the findings reported in previous studies, abnormal placental cord insertion was more frequent in pregnancies complicated by uterine anomalies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
先天性子宫异常与胎盘脐带插入异常和不良妊娠并发症的关系:一项回顾性队列研究。
目的:孕期先天性子宫畸形会增加妊娠并发症的风险,如流产、早产、胎位不正、剖宫产和胎儿生长受限。然而,除上述研究外,很少有研究探讨子宫异常与围产期并发症的关系。我们调查了本院先天性子宫异常并发妊娠与各种围产期结局之间的关系:这项回顾性队列研究于 2009 年 1 月至 2021 年 5 月进行。我们纳入了子宫畸形病例,如子宫纵隔、双角子宫、单角子宫和双角子宫。首先,我们比较了子宫畸形妊娠和子宫正常妊娠的围产期并发症和新生儿结局。其次,我们根据子宫畸形的类型进行了分析,并将其分为两组:轻微畸形组包括仅限于子宫腔的畸形,如隔子宫;而严重畸形组包括影响子宫形状的畸形,如双角子宫、单角子宫和双角子宫。我们比较了大畸形组、小畸形组和正常子宫组围产期并发症的发生率:结果:在研究期间,有 45 例妊娠合并子宫畸形。小畸形组包括 11 名患者,大畸形组包括 34 名患者。子宫畸形组胎儿畸形的发生率明显高于正常子宫组(18% 对 3.7%,P = .04)。此外,子宫畸形组胎盘脐带插入异常的频率也明显高于正常子宫组(16% vs. 3.7%,P = .01)。根据子宫异常类型进行的检查显示,宫颈机能不全、胎位不正、剖宫产和胎盘脐带异常置入方面存在显著差异。轻微畸形患者更容易出现宫颈机能不全。相比之下,胎儿畸形、剖宫产和胎盘脐带插入异常在重大畸形组中的发生率更高:结论:与之前的研究结果相比,子宫畸形并发妊娠中胎盘脐带插入异常的发生率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
217
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The official journal of The European Association of Perinatal Medicine, The Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies and The International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians. The journal publishes a wide range of peer-reviewed research on the obstetric, medical, genetic, mental health and surgical complications of pregnancy and their effects on the mother, fetus and neonate. Research on audit, evaluation and clinical care in maternal-fetal and perinatal medicine is also featured.
期刊最新文献
Meta-analysis of the efficacy of different blue light therapy methods for neonatal jaundice. Association of duration of intrapartum maternal hyperglycemia in well-controlled gestational diabetes mellitus women and risks of neonatal hypoglycemia: a retrospective cohort study. Changes in short-term variation of antenatal cardiotocography to identify intraamniotic infection: a historical cohort study. Predictive efficacy of machine-learning algorithms on intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy based on clinical and laboratory indicators. Some comments on "Maternal hemoglobin A1c and left ventricular hypertrophy in infants of mothers with pregestational diabetes".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1