The utility of virtual reality and manikin crisis scenario simulations for anaesthesia trainee education: a randomised crossover pilot study

IF 0.8 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anaesthesia reports Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1002/anr3.12316
L. W. Babus, H. Gurnaney, A. K. Doshi, H. Liu, A. Nishisaki, D. Singh, R. J. Daly Guris, the CHOP Virtual Reality Group
{"title":"The utility of virtual reality and manikin crisis scenario simulations for anaesthesia trainee education: a randomised crossover pilot study","authors":"L. W. Babus,&nbsp;H. Gurnaney,&nbsp;A. K. Doshi,&nbsp;H. Liu,&nbsp;A. Nishisaki,&nbsp;D. Singh,&nbsp;R. J. Daly Guris,&nbsp;the CHOP Virtual Reality Group","doi":"10.1002/anr3.12316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Simulation education for anaesthesia trainees is essential to build clinical skills and virtual reality can provide a reproducible, high-fidelity intra-operative training environment. Compared to in-situ manikin-based simulation, this modality has yet to be thoroughly evaluated. Twenty-six second post-graduate year anaesthesiology residents were randomly divided into two groups and participated in both virtual reality and manikin crisis scenarios at sessions six months apart. The exposure order was group A virtual reality followed by manikin and group B manikin followed by virtual reality. Clinical assessments were performed using a standardised checklist. Knowledge assessments were conducted. National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index and System Usability Scale scores were collected immediately after participation. Clinical scores between groups A and B were not significantly different. Group A had improved post-simulation knowledge scores after both sessions. Task load index scores were lower in mental demand for virtual reality. System usability scores showed less ease of use and more need for support in virtual reality.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72186,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia reports","volume":"12 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/anr3.12316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Simulation education for anaesthesia trainees is essential to build clinical skills and virtual reality can provide a reproducible, high-fidelity intra-operative training environment. Compared to in-situ manikin-based simulation, this modality has yet to be thoroughly evaluated. Twenty-six second post-graduate year anaesthesiology residents were randomly divided into two groups and participated in both virtual reality and manikin crisis scenarios at sessions six months apart. The exposure order was group A virtual reality followed by manikin and group B manikin followed by virtual reality. Clinical assessments were performed using a standardised checklist. Knowledge assessments were conducted. National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index and System Usability Scale scores were collected immediately after participation. Clinical scores between groups A and B were not significantly different. Group A had improved post-simulation knowledge scores after both sessions. Task load index scores were lower in mental demand for virtual reality. System usability scores showed less ease of use and more need for support in virtual reality.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
虚拟现实和人体模型危机情景模拟在麻醉学员教育中的实用性:随机交叉试验研究。
麻醉受训人员的模拟教育对于培养临床技能至关重要,而虚拟现实技术可提供可重复的高保真术中培训环境。与基于人体模型的原位模拟相比,这种模式还有待全面评估。26 名麻醉学研究生二年级住院医师被随机分为两组,分别参加了虚拟现实和人体模型危机情景模拟,两组的培训时间相隔 6 个月。暴露顺序为 A 组先虚拟现实后人体模型,B 组先人体模型后虚拟现实。临床评估采用标准化核对表进行。还进行了知识评估。参与后立即收集美国国家航空航天局任务负荷指数和系统可用性量表得分。A 组和 B 组的临床评分差异不大。A 组在两次模拟后的知识得分都有所提高。任务负荷指数得分显示,虚拟现实的心理需求较低。系统可用性评分显示,虚拟现实技术的易用性较低,更需要支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hybrid closed loop technology in emergency surgery in a person with type 1 diabetes Ultrasonography guided modified Sellick manoeuvre in post-oesophagectomy patients – a case series* Epidural spread of injectate from a costoclavicular catheter due to selective lodging in the middle trunk Anaesthetic management of a large multi-nodular goitre with dynamic bilateral carotid artery compression Epidural analgesia in an obstetric patient with an intradural lipoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1