Blended learning: Assessing nursing students' perspectives.

Ilze Steenkamp, Jennifer Chipps
{"title":"Blended learning: Assessing nursing students' perspectives.","authors":"Ilze Steenkamp, Jennifer Chipps","doi":"10.4102/curationis.v47i1.2579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Blended learning combines face-to-face and online learning and has recently gained popularity, accelerated by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, often without active evaluation.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong> This study aimed to assess university nursing students' perceptions of a blended learning approach during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong> The population was 150 third-year nursing students from a university in the Western Cape, South Africa, using all-inclusive sampling. A one-group, pre-and post-evaluation study was conducted using a self-administered questionnaire (Student Perceptions of Blended Learning scale). Differences were assessed using Chi-squared and Mann-Whitney U tests with a significance level of p  0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Before implementing blended learning, 128 students (85.3%) completed the questionnaire, while 95 (63.3%) did so after. Demographics and access showed no significant differences between the groups. Post-implementation showed a 10.1% increase in preference for blended learning (χ2 = 2.832, p = 0.092). Ease of use was rated significantly higher before implementation (3.07 ± 0.49), with no significant change post-implementation (2.99 ± 0.58). The blended learning process received lower ratings compared to content, with no significant differences before or after implementation for either (process: 2.55 ± 0.58 vs 2.54 ± 0.63; content: 2.75 ± 0.52 vs 2.79 ± 0.52).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Nursing students had a positive perception of blended learning, though the online learning component posed challenges with time and module comprehension.Contribution: The findings can help higher education institutions evaluate existing online management systems and guide nurse educators in meeting students' needs when developing module resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":93959,"journal":{"name":"Curationis","volume":"47 1","pages":"e1-e8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11304200/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curationis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/curationis.v47i1.2579","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  Blended learning combines face-to-face and online learning and has recently gained popularity, accelerated by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, often without active evaluation.

Objectives:  This study aimed to assess university nursing students' perceptions of a blended learning approach during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Method:  The population was 150 third-year nursing students from a university in the Western Cape, South Africa, using all-inclusive sampling. A one-group, pre-and post-evaluation study was conducted using a self-administered questionnaire (Student Perceptions of Blended Learning scale). Differences were assessed using Chi-squared and Mann-Whitney U tests with a significance level of p  0.05.

Results:  Before implementing blended learning, 128 students (85.3%) completed the questionnaire, while 95 (63.3%) did so after. Demographics and access showed no significant differences between the groups. Post-implementation showed a 10.1% increase in preference for blended learning (χ2 = 2.832, p = 0.092). Ease of use was rated significantly higher before implementation (3.07 ± 0.49), with no significant change post-implementation (2.99 ± 0.58). The blended learning process received lower ratings compared to content, with no significant differences before or after implementation for either (process: 2.55 ± 0.58 vs 2.54 ± 0.63; content: 2.75 ± 0.52 vs 2.79 ± 0.52).

Conclusion:  Nursing students had a positive perception of blended learning, though the online learning component posed challenges with time and module comprehension.Contribution: The findings can help higher education institutions evaluate existing online management systems and guide nurse educators in meeting students' needs when developing module resources.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
混合式学习:评估护理专业学生的观点。
背景: 混合式学习将面授学习和在线学习结合在一起,最近由于2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行而得到了普及,但往往没有进行积极的评估: 本研究旨在评估大学护理专业学生在 COVID-19 大流行期间对混合式学习方法的看法: 研究对象是来自南非西开普省一所大学的 150 名三年级护理专业学生,采用全包式抽样。采用自填式问卷(学生对混合式学习的看法量表)进行了单组前后评价研究。差异采用卡方检验(Chi-squared)和曼-惠特尼 U 检验(Mann-Whitney U)进行评估,显著性水平为 p 0.05: 实施混合式学习前,128 名学生(85.3%)完成了问卷调查,实施混合式学习后,95 名学生(63.3%)完成了问卷调查。两组学生的人口统计学和入学情况无明显差异。实施混合式学习后,学生对混合式学习的偏好增加了 10.1%(χ2 = 2.832,p = 0.092)。实施前,易用性的评分明显较高(3.07 ± 0.49),实施后没有明显变化(2.99 ± 0.58)。与内容相比,混合式学习过程的评分较低,两者在实施前后无明显差异(过程:2.55 ± 0.58 vs 2.54 ± 0.63;内容:2.75 ± 0.52 vs 2.79 ± 0.52): 结论:护理专业学生对混合式学习有积极的看法,尽管在线学习部分在时间和模块理解方面存在挑战:贡献:研究结果有助于高等教育机构评估现有的在线管理系统,并指导护士教育者在开发模块资源时满足学生的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nurse managers on healthy environments for adolescents living with intellectual disabilities. Midwives' experiences regarding recordkeeping during intrapartum care in Limpopo Province healthcare facilities. A conceptual framework for psychiatric nurses to facilitate medication compliance among adults living with depression. Impact of anxiety-related conditions on nursing students' academic excellence. Newly qualified primary care nurses' preparedness to make sound clinical judgements in practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1