Prevalence of anti-HLA antibodies in COVID-19 convalescent plasma donors: an Indian experience

{"title":"Prevalence of anti-HLA antibodies in COVID-19 convalescent plasma donors: an Indian experience","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.htct.2024.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>COVID-19 convalescent plasma is one of the experimental therapies used widely in moderately sick COVID-19 patients. However, there are a few risks involved in plasma transfusion; notably, transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI) caused by antibodies against human leukocyte antigens (HLA). This study was designed to assess the prevalence of anti-HLA antibodies in convalescent plasma donors using the single antigen bead method.</p></div><div><h3>Study design and methods</h3><p>This was a hospital-based observational study of consecutive plasma donors. A total of 252 samples were screened for anti-HLA Class I and Class II antibodies using the microbead assay with the identification of anti-HLA Ab in positive samples being performed using a single antigen bead assay. Luminex-based normalized background cutoff ratios of 10.8 for Class I and 6.9 for Class II and mean fluorescence intensity cutoffs of 2500 for Class I and 1500 for Class II were used for screening and the single bead assay, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 252 screened samples, 28 (11.1 %) were positive for Class I, Class II or both Class I and Class II anti-HLA antibodies in donors with no history of a previous immunizing event. Moreover, 20/252 (7.9%) donors without any history of prior immunization had specific anti-HLA antibodies of Class I or Class II or both by the single bead assay.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The high prevalence of anti-HLA antibodies in our cohort of donors raises an urgent and immediate need for anti-HLA antibody screening in all convalescent plasma donors for safe therapy of COVID-19 patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12958,"journal":{"name":"Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2531137924002207/pdfft?md5=809a29f3e4c0b3f7258665bc187ca146&pid=1-s2.0-S2531137924002207-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2531137924002207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

COVID-19 convalescent plasma is one of the experimental therapies used widely in moderately sick COVID-19 patients. However, there are a few risks involved in plasma transfusion; notably, transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI) caused by antibodies against human leukocyte antigens (HLA). This study was designed to assess the prevalence of anti-HLA antibodies in convalescent plasma donors using the single antigen bead method.

Study design and methods

This was a hospital-based observational study of consecutive plasma donors. A total of 252 samples were screened for anti-HLA Class I and Class II antibodies using the microbead assay with the identification of anti-HLA Ab in positive samples being performed using a single antigen bead assay. Luminex-based normalized background cutoff ratios of 10.8 for Class I and 6.9 for Class II and mean fluorescence intensity cutoffs of 2500 for Class I and 1500 for Class II were used for screening and the single bead assay, respectively.

Results

Of 252 screened samples, 28 (11.1 %) were positive for Class I, Class II or both Class I and Class II anti-HLA antibodies in donors with no history of a previous immunizing event. Moreover, 20/252 (7.9%) donors without any history of prior immunization had specific anti-HLA antibodies of Class I or Class II or both by the single bead assay.

Conclusions

The high prevalence of anti-HLA antibodies in our cohort of donors raises an urgent and immediate need for anti-HLA antibody screening in all convalescent plasma donors for safe therapy of COVID-19 patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 康复血浆捐献者中抗 HLA 抗体的流行情况:印度的经验。
背景:COVID-19 康复血浆是广泛用于中度 COVID-19 患者的实验疗法之一。然而,血浆输注存在一些风险,尤其是由人类白细胞抗原(HLA)抗体引起的输血相关急性肺损伤(TRALI)。本研究旨在使用单抗原珠法评估康复期血浆捐献者中抗 HLA 抗体的流行率:这是一项以医院为基础的观察性研究,研究对象为连续的血浆捐献者。研究设计:这是一项以医院为基础的连续血浆捐献者观察性研究。使用微珠检测法对总共 252 份样本进行了抗 HLA I 类和 II 类抗体筛查,并使用单抗原微珠检测法对阳性样本中的抗 HLA Ab 进行鉴定。基于 Luminex 的归一化背景截断比 I 类为 10.8,II 类为 6.9,平均荧光强度截断比 I 类为 2500,II 类为 1500:在 252 份筛查样本中,有 28 份(11.1%)样本的 I 类、II 类或 I 类和 II 类抗 HLA 抗体均呈阳性,且供体既往无免疫史。此外,20/252(7.9%)名无既往免疫史的捐献者在单珠检测中检测出特异性 I 类或 II 类抗-HLA 抗体,或同时检测出这两种抗-HLA 抗体:结论:抗-HLA 抗体在我们的捐献者队列中的高流行率提出了对所有康复血浆捐献者进行抗-HLA 抗体筛查的迫切性和即时性,以便对 COVID-19 患者进行安全治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
1419
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
The challenge of timely diagnosis and management of acute leukemias and associated infections in Latin America The Brazilian association of hematology, hemotherapy, and cell therapy (ABHH) and its absolute commitment to ethics and absence of conflicts of interest Diagnosis and management of acute promyelocytic leukemia: Brazilian consensus guidelines 2024 on behalf of the Brazilian Association of Hematology, Hemotherapy and Cellular Therapy A SUCCESSFUL CASE OF PRIMARY PLASMA CELL LEUKEMIA TREATED WITH DARATUMUMAB-BASED THERAPY FOLLOWED BY AUTOLOGOUS BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION CARCINOMA EX PLEOMORPHIC ADENOMA: DIAGNOSTIC CHALLENGE AND TREATMENT PROTOCOL
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1