Physician-medical manufacturing industry relationships: Perceptions of medical students.

Avneet Kaur, Simerjit Singh, Harmanpreet Singh
{"title":"Physician-medical manufacturing industry relationships: Perceptions of medical students.","authors":"Avneet Kaur, Simerjit Singh, Harmanpreet Singh","doi":"10.25259/NMJI_328_2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Physicians and the medical manufacturing industry (MMI) are closely associated and may have some form of financial or business arrangement. Research has highlighted that these interactions negatively impact physicians' prescribing behaviour. We tried to explore medical students' perspectives regarding these interactions. Methods We did a questionnaire-based survey to capture the demographic information and included five yes-or-no questions with two possible answers that probed the participants' awareness. Statements (26 Likert-style questions) describing various physician-industry interactions were formulated based on previous research. Excel was used to gather the data, and SPSS v 25.0® for Windows was used to analyse it. Frequencies and percentages (qualitative variables) and means and standard deviations were used to present descriptive statistics (quantitative variables). The associations between the independent variables and awareness were examined using chi-square test. Results About 40% of students knew doctors and MMI work together, but only 6% knew there were rules about accepting gifts from MMI. Eighty-four per cent of respondents felt free samples from MMI were an excellent way to learn about new products. The prevalence of awareness was higher in interns/housemen (51.6%) compared to medical students (35.9%). Most (43%) of the participants preferred an online database as a method of disclosure. Conclusions Our findings indicated students' knowledge gaps regarding ethical considerations and recommended guidelines regarding the relational dynamics of medical practitioners and MMI. Students should be taught appropriate conduct and best practices and must strive to develop skepticism towards MMI marketing claims. This may be achieved by implementing various educational interventions in the medical curriculum.</p>","PeriodicalId":519891,"journal":{"name":"The National medical journal of India","volume":"37 1","pages":"46-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The National medical journal of India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/NMJI_328_2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Physicians and the medical manufacturing industry (MMI) are closely associated and may have some form of financial or business arrangement. Research has highlighted that these interactions negatively impact physicians' prescribing behaviour. We tried to explore medical students' perspectives regarding these interactions. Methods We did a questionnaire-based survey to capture the demographic information and included five yes-or-no questions with two possible answers that probed the participants' awareness. Statements (26 Likert-style questions) describing various physician-industry interactions were formulated based on previous research. Excel was used to gather the data, and SPSS v 25.0® for Windows was used to analyse it. Frequencies and percentages (qualitative variables) and means and standard deviations were used to present descriptive statistics (quantitative variables). The associations between the independent variables and awareness were examined using chi-square test. Results About 40% of students knew doctors and MMI work together, but only 6% knew there were rules about accepting gifts from MMI. Eighty-four per cent of respondents felt free samples from MMI were an excellent way to learn about new products. The prevalence of awareness was higher in interns/housemen (51.6%) compared to medical students (35.9%). Most (43%) of the participants preferred an online database as a method of disclosure. Conclusions Our findings indicated students' knowledge gaps regarding ethical considerations and recommended guidelines regarding the relational dynamics of medical practitioners and MMI. Students should be taught appropriate conduct and best practices and must strive to develop skepticism towards MMI marketing claims. This may be achieved by implementing various educational interventions in the medical curriculum.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医生与医药制造业的关系:医学生的看法。
背景 医生与医药制造业(MMI)密切相关,并可能有某种形式的财务或业务安排。研究强调,这些互动关系会对医生的处方行为产生负面影响。我们试图探讨医学生对这些互动关系的看法。方法 我们进行了一项问卷调查,以获取人口统计学信息,其中包括五个 "是 "或 "否 "的问题,有两个可能的答案,以探究参与者的认识。根据以往的研究,我们制定了描述各种医生与行业互动的陈述(26 个李克特式问题)。数据收集使用 Excel,分析使用 SPSS v 25.0® for Windows。使用频率和百分比(定性变量)以及平均值和标准差来进行描述性统计(定量变量)。自变量与认知度之间的关系采用卡方检验。结果 约 40%的学生知道医生和 MMI 合作,但只有 6%的学生知道有关于接受 MMI 礼物的规定。84%的受访者认为MMI提供的免费样品是了解新产品的绝佳途径。与医科学生(35.9%)相比,实习生/实习医生(51.6%)的认知率更高。大多数参与者(43%)倾向于选择在线数据库作为披露信息的方式。结论 我们的研究结果表明,学生在伦理考虑方面存在知识差距,并就执业医师与 MMI 的关系动态提出了指导建议。应向学生传授适当的行为和最佳做法,必须努力培养学生对 MMI 营销声称的怀疑态度。这可以通过在医学课程中实施各种教育干预措施来实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mid-level healthcare providers: Making a fresh case for modern Indian healthcare. Palbociclib: A novel and effective therapy for advanced liposarcoma. Regional patterns in minimum diet diversity failure and associated factors among children aged 6-23 months in India. Scrub typhus presenting as mitral valve infective endocarditis. Scrub typhus presenting with massive splenomegaly and lobar pneumonia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1