Non-prescription sympathomimetic agents and hypertension.

S S Chua, S I Benrimoj
{"title":"Non-prescription sympathomimetic agents and hypertension.","authors":"S S Chua,&nbsp;S I Benrimoj","doi":"10.1007/BF03259892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In recent years, considerable attention has been focused on the pressor effects of nonprescription sympathomimetic agents. The impact and usage of these agents especially ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, phenylpropanolamine and phenylephrine, in hypertensive patients has been the topic of constant debates. The present review is an attempt to report and evaluate all the clinical trials and cases of pressor reactions associated with these 4 agents. The study protocols used in these clinical trials are examined and comments made on any diversion from the standard design. Many factors are found to cause the discrepancies in the data available. It is concluded that ephedrine and phenylpropanolamine are best avoided by hypertensive patients due to higher probability of causing pressor reactions. Data on pseudoephedrine and phenylephrine appear to indicate non-significant effects on blood pressure of normotensive subjects when used at the recommended oral dose as nasal decongestants. Phenylephrine is also commonly employed in nasal and eye drops and the limited data available appear to support its usage in hypertensive patients. However, it is noted that most of the clinical trials involve normotensive subjects and the majority of the results could not be verified due to inadequacies in the study design. This paucity and inconclusive information on hypertensive patients warrants further investigations with emphasis on the study protocols used.</p>","PeriodicalId":77748,"journal":{"name":"Medical toxicology and adverse drug experience","volume":"3 5","pages":"387-417"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF03259892","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical toxicology and adverse drug experience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03259892","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

In recent years, considerable attention has been focused on the pressor effects of nonprescription sympathomimetic agents. The impact and usage of these agents especially ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, phenylpropanolamine and phenylephrine, in hypertensive patients has been the topic of constant debates. The present review is an attempt to report and evaluate all the clinical trials and cases of pressor reactions associated with these 4 agents. The study protocols used in these clinical trials are examined and comments made on any diversion from the standard design. Many factors are found to cause the discrepancies in the data available. It is concluded that ephedrine and phenylpropanolamine are best avoided by hypertensive patients due to higher probability of causing pressor reactions. Data on pseudoephedrine and phenylephrine appear to indicate non-significant effects on blood pressure of normotensive subjects when used at the recommended oral dose as nasal decongestants. Phenylephrine is also commonly employed in nasal and eye drops and the limited data available appear to support its usage in hypertensive patients. However, it is noted that most of the clinical trials involve normotensive subjects and the majority of the results could not be verified due to inadequacies in the study design. This paucity and inconclusive information on hypertensive patients warrants further investigations with emphasis on the study protocols used.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非处方拟交感神经药物与高血压。
近年来,非处方拟交感神经药物的升压作用引起了相当大的关注。这些药物,特别是麻黄碱、伪麻黄碱、苯丙醇胺和苯肾上腺素在高血压患者中的作用和使用一直是争论不休的话题。本综述试图报道和评价所有与这4种药物相关的加压反应的临床试验和病例。对这些临床试验中使用的研究方案进行检查,并对任何偏离标准设计的情况作出评论。发现许多因素导致了现有数据中的差异。结论:麻黄碱和苯丙醇胺引起降压反应的可能性较大,高血压患者最好避免使用。伪麻黄碱和苯肾上腺素的数据似乎表明,在推荐的口服剂量下,作为减充血剂,对血压正常受试者的血压没有显著影响。苯肾上腺素也常用于鼻滴剂和眼药水中,现有的有限数据似乎支持其在高血压患者中的使用。然而,值得注意的是,大多数临床试验涉及血压正常的受试者,并且由于研究设计的不足,大多数结果无法得到验证。这种关于高血压患者信息的缺乏和不确定值得进一步调查,重点是研究方案的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Poisoning due to class 1B antiarrhythmic drugs. Lignocaine, mexiletine and tocainide. Fulminant hyperkalaemia and multiple complications following ibuprofen overdose. Problems and pitfalls in the use of hyperbaric oxygen for the treatment of poisoned patients. A prolonged QTc interval. Is it an important effect of antiarrhythmic drugs? Clinical features and management of poisoning due to potassium chloride.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1