Content Validity and Psychometric Evaluation of the Crohn’s Symptom Severity (CSS) Questionnaire in Patients with Moderately to Severely Active Crohn’s Disease
Edouard Louis, Wan-Ju Lee, Leighann Litcher-Kelly, Sarah Ollis, Emma Pranschke, Kristina Fitzgerald, Ana Paula Lacerda, Ezequiel Neimark, Yuri Sanchez Gonzalez, Julian Panés
{"title":"Content Validity and Psychometric Evaluation of the Crohn’s Symptom Severity (CSS) Questionnaire in Patients with Moderately to Severely Active Crohn’s Disease","authors":"Edouard Louis, Wan-Ju Lee, Leighann Litcher-Kelly, Sarah Ollis, Emma Pranschke, Kristina Fitzgerald, Ana Paula Lacerda, Ezequiel Neimark, Yuri Sanchez Gonzalez, Julian Panés","doi":"10.1007/s12325-024-02923-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Individuals living with Crohn’s disease (CD) experience burdensome symptoms. As such, it is important to measure CD symptom severity in clinical research. The goal of this study was to evaluate the content validity, psychometric performance, and score interpretability of a new patient-reported instrument, the Crohn’s Symptom Severity (CSS) questionnaire, among adolescents and adults with moderately to severely active CD.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Cognitive debriefing interviews (<i>N</i> = 30; <i>n</i> = 20 adults, <i>n</i> = 10 adolescents) were conducted to evaluate the content validity of the CSS. Additionally, the CSS scores were evaluated for reliability and validity using data from a phase 3 randomized clinical trial of risankizumab (NCT03105128; <i>N</i> = 850). Meaningful within-patient change (MWPC) thresholds were estimated using anchor-based methods.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>All interview participants (<i>n</i> = 30/30, 100.00%) reported the CSS was easy to complete and most participants (<i>n</i> = 28/29, 96.55%) reported that the CSS was relevant to their experience of CD. Among the clinical trial subjects (<i>N</i> = 850) the following was found for the CSS: mostly acceptable item–total correlations (0.26–0.79); weak to moderate inter-item correlations (<i>r</i> = 0.07–0.57), good internal consistency (Cronbach’s <i>α</i> = 0.76–0.87); intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.48 to 0.70, not consistently exceeding the acceptable range for test–retest reliability (0.70); acceptable convergent validity and known-groups results; and demonstrated sensitivity to change. Analyses supported an MWPC estimate of 6–11 points.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study supports use of the CSS for measuring CD symptoms and sleep impact among adolescents and adults aged 16 and older with moderately to severely active CD in clinical research.</p><h3>Trial Registration</h3><p>NCT03105128 (registration date 4 April 2017).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11349822/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12325-024-02923-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Individuals living with Crohn’s disease (CD) experience burdensome symptoms. As such, it is important to measure CD symptom severity in clinical research. The goal of this study was to evaluate the content validity, psychometric performance, and score interpretability of a new patient-reported instrument, the Crohn’s Symptom Severity (CSS) questionnaire, among adolescents and adults with moderately to severely active CD.
Methods
Cognitive debriefing interviews (N = 30; n = 20 adults, n = 10 adolescents) were conducted to evaluate the content validity of the CSS. Additionally, the CSS scores were evaluated for reliability and validity using data from a phase 3 randomized clinical trial of risankizumab (NCT03105128; N = 850). Meaningful within-patient change (MWPC) thresholds were estimated using anchor-based methods.
Results
All interview participants (n = 30/30, 100.00%) reported the CSS was easy to complete and most participants (n = 28/29, 96.55%) reported that the CSS was relevant to their experience of CD. Among the clinical trial subjects (N = 850) the following was found for the CSS: mostly acceptable item–total correlations (0.26–0.79); weak to moderate inter-item correlations (r = 0.07–0.57), good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.76–0.87); intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.48 to 0.70, not consistently exceeding the acceptable range for test–retest reliability (0.70); acceptable convergent validity and known-groups results; and demonstrated sensitivity to change. Analyses supported an MWPC estimate of 6–11 points.
Conclusions
This study supports use of the CSS for measuring CD symptoms and sleep impact among adolescents and adults aged 16 and older with moderately to severely active CD in clinical research.
期刊介绍:
Advances in Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all therapeutic areas. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged.
The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Advances in Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.