Racial and ethnic differences in self-reported barriers to substance use treatment among emergency department patients

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE American Journal on Addictions Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1111/ajad.13631
Neha Jia Ahmad MD, MPH, Hannah Shapiro BS, Margaret L. Griffin PhD, Roger D. Weiss MD, Wendy L. Macias-Konstantopoulos MD, MPH, MBA
{"title":"Racial and ethnic differences in self-reported barriers to substance use treatment among emergency department patients","authors":"Neha Jia Ahmad MD, MPH,&nbsp;Hannah Shapiro BS,&nbsp;Margaret L. Griffin PhD,&nbsp;Roger D. Weiss MD,&nbsp;Wendy L. Macias-Konstantopoulos MD, MPH, MBA","doi":"10.1111/ajad.13631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>As overdose rates rise among non-White Americans, understanding barriers to substance use disorder (SUD) treatment access by race and ethnicity is important. This study explores self-reported barriers to SUD treatment by race and ethnicity in emergency department (ED) populations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a secondary, exploratory analysis of a randomized trial of patients not seeking SUD treatment who endorsed active drug use at six academic EDs. Responses to the Barriers to Treatment Inventory were compared by race, ethnicity, and drug severity, using χ<sup>2</sup> tests (<i>N</i> = 858), followed by adjusted logistic regression models.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Absence of a perceived drug problem (39% non-Hispanic Black, 38% Hispanic, 50% non-Hispanic White; <i>p</i> ≤ .001) was the most prevalent barrier to SUD treatment. Non-Hispanic Black participants were less likely to state that they could handle their drug use on their own (OR = 0.69, CI = 0.50–0.95), and were more likely to report disliking personal questions than non-Hispanic White participants (OR = 1.49, CI = 1.07–2.09). Non-Hispanic Black participants were less likely than Hispanic participants to agree that treatment availability (OR = 0.46, CI = 0.28–0.76) and family disapproval (OR = 0.38, CI = 0.16–0.91) were treatment barriers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion and Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Screening and counseling may help address the barrier, common to all groups, that drug use was not seen as problematic. Expanding access to diverse treatment options may also address the range of barriers reported by our study population.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Scientific Significance</h3>\n \n <p>Our study is one of the first in the U.S. to examine both individual and structural barriers to accessing treatment and to examine the association with drug use severity by race/ethnicity.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7762,"journal":{"name":"American Journal on Addictions","volume":"33 6","pages":"631-640"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal on Addictions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajad.13631","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objectives

As overdose rates rise among non-White Americans, understanding barriers to substance use disorder (SUD) treatment access by race and ethnicity is important. This study explores self-reported barriers to SUD treatment by race and ethnicity in emergency department (ED) populations.

Methods

We conducted a secondary, exploratory analysis of a randomized trial of patients not seeking SUD treatment who endorsed active drug use at six academic EDs. Responses to the Barriers to Treatment Inventory were compared by race, ethnicity, and drug severity, using χ2 tests (N = 858), followed by adjusted logistic regression models.

Results

Absence of a perceived drug problem (39% non-Hispanic Black, 38% Hispanic, 50% non-Hispanic White; p ≤ .001) was the most prevalent barrier to SUD treatment. Non-Hispanic Black participants were less likely to state that they could handle their drug use on their own (OR = 0.69, CI = 0.50–0.95), and were more likely to report disliking personal questions than non-Hispanic White participants (OR = 1.49, CI = 1.07–2.09). Non-Hispanic Black participants were less likely than Hispanic participants to agree that treatment availability (OR = 0.46, CI = 0.28–0.76) and family disapproval (OR = 0.38, CI = 0.16–0.91) were treatment barriers.

Discussion and Conclusions

Screening and counseling may help address the barrier, common to all groups, that drug use was not seen as problematic. Expanding access to diverse treatment options may also address the range of barriers reported by our study population.

Scientific Significance

Our study is one of the first in the U.S. to examine both individual and structural barriers to accessing treatment and to examine the association with drug use severity by race/ethnicity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊科患者自我报告的药物使用治疗障碍的种族和民族差异。
背景和目标:随着非白人美国人用药过量率的上升,了解不同种族和族裔在获得药物使用障碍(SUD)治疗方面的障碍非常重要。本研究探讨了急诊科(ED)人群中不同种族和族裔自我报告的 SUD 治疗障碍:我们对六家学术性急诊室中未寻求 SUD 治疗但认可积极吸毒的患者进行了随机试验的二次探索性分析。使用χ2检验(N = 858)比较了不同种族、民族和毒品严重程度的患者对治疗障碍量表的反应,然后使用调整后的逻辑回归模型进行分析:没有发现毒品问题(39% 非西班牙裔黑人、38% 西班牙裔、50% 非西班牙裔白人;P ≤ .001)是接受 SUD 治疗最普遍的障碍。与非西班牙裔白人参与者相比,非西班牙裔黑人参与者不太可能表示他们可以自己处理吸毒问题(OR = 0.69,CI = 0.50-0.95),并且更可能表示不喜欢个人问题(OR = 1.49,CI = 1.07-2.09)。与西班牙裔参与者相比,非西班牙裔黑人参与者不太可能同意治疗的可获得性(OR = 0.46,CI = 0.28-0.76)和家庭的不认可(OR = 0.38,CI = 0.16-0.91)是治疗障碍:讨论和结论:筛查和咨询可能有助于解决所有群体共同面临的障碍,即认为吸毒没有问题。扩大获得各种治疗选择的机会也可以解决我们的研究对象所报告的一系列障碍:我们的研究是美国第一项同时研究获得治疗的个人障碍和结构性障碍,并按种族/民族研究其与吸毒严重程度的关系的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: The American Journal on Addictions is the official journal of the American Academy of Addiction Psychiatry. The Academy encourages research on the etiology, prevention, identification, and treatment of substance abuse; thus, the journal provides a forum for the dissemination of information in the extensive field of addiction. Each issue of this publication covers a wide variety of topics ranging from codependence to genetics, epidemiology to dual diagnostics, etiology to neuroscience, and much more. Features of the journal, all written by experts in the field, include special overview articles, clinical or basic research papers, clinical updates, and book reviews within the area of addictions.
期刊最新文献
Cannabis and the overdose crisis among US adolescents. Associations between big five personality dimensions and lifetime use of cannabis. Correction to "Extended-release buprenorphine in pregnancy". Interactive effects of ARRB2 and CHRNA5 genetic polymorphisms on cognitive function in Chinese male methamphetamine use disorder patients. Profiles of polysubstance use among people reporting past 12-month sleep-motivated nonmedical use of prescription tranquilizers/sedatives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1