Downgrading Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System categories in ultrasound using strain elastography and computer-aided diagnosis system: a multicenter, prospective study.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING British Journal of Radiology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1093/bjr/tqae136
Yu Du, Ji Ma, Tingting Wu, Fang Li, Jiazhen Pan, Liwen Du, Manqi Zhang, Xuehong Diao, Rong Wu
{"title":"Downgrading Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System categories in ultrasound using strain elastography and computer-aided diagnosis system: a multicenter, prospective study.","authors":"Yu Du, Ji Ma, Tingting Wu, Fang Li, Jiazhen Pan, Liwen Du, Manqi Zhang, Xuehong Diao, Rong Wu","doi":"10.1093/bjr/tqae136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether adding elastography strain ratio (SR) and a deep learning based computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system to breast ultrasound (US) can help reclassify Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 3 and 4a-c categories and avoid unnecessary biopsies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, multicentre study included 1049 masses (691 benign, 358 malignant) with assigned BI-RADS 3 and 4a-c between 2020 and 2022. CAD results was dichotomized possibly malignant vs. benign. All patients underwent SR and CAD examinations and histopathological findings were the standard of reference. Reduction of unnecessary biopsies (biopsies in benign lesions) and missed malignancies after reclassified (new BI-RADS 3) with SR and CAD were the outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following the routine conventional breast US assessment, 48.6% (336 of 691 masses) underwent unnecessary biopsies. After reclassifying BI-RADS 4a masses (SR cut-off <2.90, CAD dichotomized possibly benign), 25.62% (177 of 691 masses) underwent an unnecessary biopsies corresponding to a 50.14% (177 vs. 355) reduction of unnecessary biopsies. After reclassification, only 1.72% (9 of 523 masses) malignancies were missed in the new BI-RADS 3 group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adding SR and CAD to clinical practice may show an optimal performance in reclassifying BI-RADS 4a to 3 categories, and 50.14% masses would be benefit by keeping the rate of undetected malignancies with an acceptable value of 1.72%.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>Leveraging the potential of SR in conjunction with CAD holds immense promise in substantially reducing the biopsy frequency associated with BI-RADS 3 and 4A lesions, thereby conferring substantial advantages upon patients encompassed within this cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":9306,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"1653-1660"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11417380/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqae136","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether adding elastography strain ratio (SR) and a deep learning based computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system to breast ultrasound (US) can help reclassify Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 3 and 4a-c categories and avoid unnecessary biopsies.

Methods: This prospective, multicentre study included 1049 masses (691 benign, 358 malignant) with assigned BI-RADS 3 and 4a-c between 2020 and 2022. CAD results was dichotomized possibly malignant vs. benign. All patients underwent SR and CAD examinations and histopathological findings were the standard of reference. Reduction of unnecessary biopsies (biopsies in benign lesions) and missed malignancies after reclassified (new BI-RADS 3) with SR and CAD were the outcome measures.

Results: Following the routine conventional breast US assessment, 48.6% (336 of 691 masses) underwent unnecessary biopsies. After reclassifying BI-RADS 4a masses (SR cut-off <2.90, CAD dichotomized possibly benign), 25.62% (177 of 691 masses) underwent an unnecessary biopsies corresponding to a 50.14% (177 vs. 355) reduction of unnecessary biopsies. After reclassification, only 1.72% (9 of 523 masses) malignancies were missed in the new BI-RADS 3 group.

Conclusion: Adding SR and CAD to clinical practice may show an optimal performance in reclassifying BI-RADS 4a to 3 categories, and 50.14% masses would be benefit by keeping the rate of undetected malignancies with an acceptable value of 1.72%.

Advances in knowledge: Leveraging the potential of SR in conjunction with CAD holds immense promise in substantially reducing the biopsy frequency associated with BI-RADS 3 and 4A lesions, thereby conferring substantial advantages upon patients encompassed within this cohort.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用应变弹性成像和计算机辅助诊断系统降低超声检查的 BI-RADS 分级:一项多中心前瞻性研究。
目的确定在乳腺超声(US)中加入弹性成像应变比(SR)和基于深度学习的计算机辅助诊断(CAD)系统是否有助于重新划分乳腺成像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)3和4a-c类别,避免不必要的活检:这项前瞻性多中心研究纳入了2020年至2022年期间BI-RADS 3和4a-c分类的1049个肿块(691个良性肿块,358个恶性肿块)。CAD结果被二分为恶性与良性。所有患者都接受了 SR 和 CAD 检查,组织病理学结果是参考标准。结果测量指标包括减少不必要的活检(良性病变的活检)和使用 SR 和 CAD 重新分类(新的 BI-RADS 3)后漏诊的恶性肿瘤:在常规常规乳腺 US 评估后,48.6%(691 个肿块中的 336 个)接受了不必要的活检。在对 BI-RADS 4a 肿块(SR 临界值小于 2.90,CAD 二分法可能为良性)进行重新分类后,25.62%(691 个肿块中的 177 个)接受了不必要的活检,相当于减少了 50.14%(177 对 355)不必要的活检。重新分类后,新的BI-RADS 3组仅有1.72%(523个肿块中的9个)的恶性肿瘤被漏诊:结论:在临床实践中加入 SR 和 CAD,可将 BI-RADS 4a 重新分类为 3 类,50.14% 的肿块将通过将未发现的恶性肿瘤率保持在 1.72% 的可接受值而获益:将 SR 的潜力与 CAD 结合使用,有望大大降低与 BI-RADS 3 和 4A 病变相关的活检频率,从而为该群组中的患者带来巨大优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Radiology
British Journal of Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
330
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: BJR is the international research journal of the British Institute of Radiology and is the oldest scientific journal in the field of radiology and related sciences. Dating back to 1896, BJR’s history is radiology’s history, and the journal has featured some landmark papers such as the first description of Computed Tomography "Computerized transverse axial tomography" by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1973. A valuable historical resource, the complete BJR archive has been digitized from 1896. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor – 1.840 - Receipt to first decision – average of 6 weeks - Acceptance to online publication – average of 3 weeks - ISSN: 0007-1285 - eISSN: 1748-880X Open Access option
期刊最新文献
Children's bone age development is delayed with increasing altitude: a multicentre study. Striving for excellence: multicentre quality improvement project to optimize CT KUB technique in renal colic patients. Assessment of interstitial lung disease in a systemic sclerosis patient cohort using photon-counting detector CT with ultra-high resolution and a 1024-pixel image matrix. Drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization combined with apatinib/camrelizumab for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with hepatic arterioportal shunts. Sister partnership to overcome the global burden of cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1