Evaluation of EUCAST rapid antimicrobial susceptibility test directly from positive blood culture for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-06 DOI:10.1007/s10096-024-04895-8
Cédric Lebreton, Damien Fournier, Katy Jeannot
{"title":"Evaluation of EUCAST rapid antimicrobial susceptibility test directly from positive blood culture for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.","authors":"Cédric Lebreton, Damien Fournier, Katy Jeannot","doi":"10.1007/s10096-024-04895-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study, we evaluated the performance of the EUCAST RAST method on a collection of 154 clinical strains of P. aeruginosa, including strains resistant to ceftazidime and carbapenems. While the test is convenient for routine laboratories, we observed significant rates of VME (ranging from 0.0 to 15.0%) and ME (ranging from 1.3 to 16.3%) after 6 h, particularly for key antibiotics such as ceftazidime, piperacillin/tazobactam, and meropenem. Extending the incubation time to 8 h may improve results (CA ranging from 87.2 to 99%), but caution is required in interpretation due to persistence of VME (ranging from 0.0 to 15.6%) and ME (ranging from 0.0 to 11.7%).</p>","PeriodicalId":11782,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"2061-2064"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-024-04895-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we evaluated the performance of the EUCAST RAST method on a collection of 154 clinical strains of P. aeruginosa, including strains resistant to ceftazidime and carbapenems. While the test is convenient for routine laboratories, we observed significant rates of VME (ranging from 0.0 to 15.0%) and ME (ranging from 1.3 to 16.3%) after 6 h, particularly for key antibiotics such as ceftazidime, piperacillin/tazobactam, and meropenem. Extending the incubation time to 8 h may improve results (CA ranging from 87.2 to 99%), but caution is required in interpretation due to persistence of VME (ranging from 0.0 to 15.6%) and ME (ranging from 0.0 to 11.7%).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估直接从铜绿假单胞菌血液培养阳性结果进行的 EUCAST 快速抗菌药物敏感性测试。
在这项研究中,我们评估了EUCAST RAST方法在154株铜绿假单胞菌临床菌株(包括对头孢他啶和碳青霉烯类耐药菌株)中的性能。虽然该检测方法方便常规实验室使用,但我们观察到 6 小时后 VME(从 0.0% 到 15.0%)和 ME(从 1.3% 到 16.3%)的发生率很高,尤其是头孢他啶、哌拉西林/他唑巴坦和美罗培南等主要抗生素。将培养时间延长至 8 小时可能会改善结果(CA 从 87.2%到 99%不等),但由于 VME(从 0.0%到 15.6%不等)和 ME(从 0.0%到 11.7%不等)的持续存在,在解释时需要谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
2.20%
发文量
138
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: EJCMID is an interdisciplinary journal devoted to the publication of communications on infectious diseases of bacterial, viral and parasitic origin.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of performances of laboratory methods in diagnosing pulmonary cryptococcosis in 1508 patients having lung biopsy tissues collected: a 6-year retrospective study. Treatment outcomes and their predictors in children hospitalized with varicella complicated by bacterial superinfections after pandemic of COVID-19 - a retrospective multicenter analysis of real-life data in Poland. Vaginal microbiota stability over 18 months in young student women in France. Carbapenem resistant Campylobacter jejuni bacteremia in a Bruton's X-linked agammaglobulinemia patient. Clinical experience with ceftazidime/avibactam for the treatment of extensively drug-resistant or pandrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in neonates and children.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1