Reducing Cancer Drug Cost: 3-Year Analysis of Automated Dose Rounding in Electronic Health Records.

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY JCO oncology practice Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1200/OP.23.00688
Vishal S Shah, Clayton Irvine, Robert R McWilliams, Parminder Singh, Scott A Soefje
{"title":"Reducing Cancer Drug Cost: 3-Year Analysis of Automated Dose Rounding in Electronic Health Records.","authors":"Vishal S Shah, Clayton Irvine, Robert R McWilliams, Parminder Singh, Scott A Soefje","doi":"10.1200/OP.23.00688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Globally, cancer drug expenditure exceeds $185 in US dollars (USD) billion, with the United States contributing $75 (USD) billion. Many cancer drug doses are calculated on the basis of body weight or body surface area, which often results in leftover drug in partially used single-dose vials (SDVs). The cost of wasted drug is a huge financial burden on the US health care system. We evaluated the cost savings resulting from the reduction of SDV wastage, achieved through the implementation of automated dose rounding rules in electronic health records (EHRs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mayo Clinic implemented automated dose rounding rules within the EHR. These rules were designed to round calculated doses to the nearest SDV if the vial size closely matched the original calculated dose, within a 10% threshold. We assessed doses administered between January 2019 and December 2021, and computed cost-savings, waste reduction, and cost of waste for chemotherapy drugs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 3 years, 36.1% of doses were rounded down, 35.8% were rounded up, and 28.1% were exact doses. By rounding doses down to a vial size, we achieved cost-savings of $39.75 (USD) million and prevented 62,065 SDV of cancer drugs from going to waste. By rounding doses up, we avoided wasting $9.95 (USD) million worth of drugs. However, there were still instances where the rounding fell outside of the 10%, resulting in wasted drugs worth $25 (USD) million.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The substantial burden imposed on patients and the US health care system because of cancer drug wastage is of significant concern. Although the automated dose rounding system represents a partial solution for this issue, a comprehensive approach involves the imperative development of policy and legislative solutions to effectively mitigate the challenges associated with cancer drug waste.</p>","PeriodicalId":14612,"journal":{"name":"JCO oncology practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP.23.00688","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Globally, cancer drug expenditure exceeds $185 in US dollars (USD) billion, with the United States contributing $75 (USD) billion. Many cancer drug doses are calculated on the basis of body weight or body surface area, which often results in leftover drug in partially used single-dose vials (SDVs). The cost of wasted drug is a huge financial burden on the US health care system. We evaluated the cost savings resulting from the reduction of SDV wastage, achieved through the implementation of automated dose rounding rules in electronic health records (EHRs).

Methods: Mayo Clinic implemented automated dose rounding rules within the EHR. These rules were designed to round calculated doses to the nearest SDV if the vial size closely matched the original calculated dose, within a 10% threshold. We assessed doses administered between January 2019 and December 2021, and computed cost-savings, waste reduction, and cost of waste for chemotherapy drugs.

Results: In 3 years, 36.1% of doses were rounded down, 35.8% were rounded up, and 28.1% were exact doses. By rounding doses down to a vial size, we achieved cost-savings of $39.75 (USD) million and prevented 62,065 SDV of cancer drugs from going to waste. By rounding doses up, we avoided wasting $9.95 (USD) million worth of drugs. However, there were still instances where the rounding fell outside of the 10%, resulting in wasted drugs worth $25 (USD) million.

Conclusion: The substantial burden imposed on patients and the US health care system because of cancer drug wastage is of significant concern. Although the automated dose rounding system represents a partial solution for this issue, a comprehensive approach involves the imperative development of policy and legislative solutions to effectively mitigate the challenges associated with cancer drug waste.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
降低癌症药物成本:电子健康记录中自动剂量调整的 3 年分析。
目的:全球抗癌药物支出超过 1,850 亿美元,其中美国为 750 亿美元。许多抗癌药物的剂量都是根据体重或体表面积计算的,这往往会导致部分使用过的单剂量药瓶(SDV)中有剩余药物。浪费药物的成本给美国医疗系统造成了巨大的经济负担。我们评估了通过在电子病历(EHR)中实施自动剂量调整规则而减少 SDV 浪费所节省的成本:梅奥诊所在电子病历中实施了自动剂量舍入规则。这些规则旨在将计算出的剂量四舍五入到最接近的 SDV,前提是药瓶大小与原始计算剂量密切匹配,且不超过 10% 的阈值。我们评估了 2019 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间的用药剂量,并计算了化疗药物的成本节约、浪费减少和浪费成本:3年中,36.1%的剂量被四舍五入,35.8%的剂量被四舍五入,28.1%的剂量为精确剂量。通过将剂量四舍五入到药瓶大小,我们节省了 3,975 万美元的成本,避免了 62,065 SDV 的抗癌药物浪费。通过四舍五入,我们避免了价值 995 万美元的药物浪费。然而,仍有四舍五入未达到 10%的情况,造成了价值 2,500 万美元的药物浪费:癌症药物浪费给患者和美国医疗系统造成的巨大负担令人深感忧虑。尽管自动剂量舍入系统是解决这一问题的部分方法,但全面的方法还包括必须制定政策和立法解决方案,以有效缓解与抗癌药物浪费相关的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
518
期刊最新文献
Why We Should, and How We Can, Reduce the Climate Toxicity of Cancer Care. Willingness of Women at Increased Risk of Breast Cancer to Participate in Prevention Trials. Telephone Survey-Reported Perceptions of Telehealth Visits Among Black and Non-Black Patients Diagnosed With Cancer. Effect of Prednisone Dosing on Mineralocorticoid-Related Side Effects With Abiraterone in Prostate Cancer. Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Is NOT a Last Resort: Rationale for Early Surgical Referral.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1