Molecular Differences With Therapeutic Implications in Early-Onset Compared With Average-Onset Biliary Tract Cancers.

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY JCO precision oncology Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1200/PO.24.00138
Thejus Jayakrishnan, Yasmine Baca, Joanne Xiu, Mehrie Patel, Benjamin A Weinberg, Emil Lou, Jashodeep Datta, Moh'd Khushman, Pat Gulhati, Sanjay Goel, Tiago Biachi de Castria, Vaia Florou, Kanika G Nair, Suneel D Kamath, Alok A Khorana
{"title":"Molecular Differences With Therapeutic Implications in Early-Onset Compared With Average-Onset Biliary Tract Cancers.","authors":"Thejus Jayakrishnan, Yasmine Baca, Joanne Xiu, Mehrie Patel, Benjamin A Weinberg, Emil Lou, Jashodeep Datta, Moh'd Khushman, Pat Gulhati, Sanjay Goel, Tiago Biachi de Castria, Vaia Florou, Kanika G Nair, Suneel D Kamath, Alok A Khorana","doi":"10.1200/PO.24.00138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Early-onset biliary tract cancer (eoBTC) is among the fast-growing subset of early-onset cancers, yet little is known about its biology. We sought to identify novel molecular characteristics of eoBTC in relation to average-onset BTC (aoBTC) using a real-world multiomics data set.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study comprised patients with BTC whose tumors underwent molecular analyses at Caris Life Sciences and were categorized by age (<50 years for eoBTC, ≥50 years for aoBTC). <i>P</i> values were adjusted for multiple testing and considered significant at <i>Q</i> < 0.05 (molecular comparisons) or <i>Q</i> < 0.25 (Gene Set Enrichment Analysis [GSEA]). Insurance claims data were used for survival analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 5,587 patients with BTC (453 eoBTC, median age = 44 years and 5,134 aoBTC, median age = 68 years). <i>FGFR2</i> fusion (15.7% in eoBTC <i>v</i> 5.9% in aoBTC) and <i>NIPBL</i> fusion (1.1% <i>v</i> 0%) were significantly more prevalent in eoBTC (both <i>Q</i> < 0.001). The interferon gamma-IFG score (fold change [FC], 1.1; <i>Q</i> = 0.01) and T-cell inflammation score (FC, 17.3; <i>Q</i> = 0.03) were significantly higher in aoBTC. On GSEA, angiogenesis was enriched in eoBTC (normalized enrichment score [NES] = 1.51; <i>Q</i> = 0.16), whereas IFG (NES = -1.58; <i>Q</i> = 0.06) and inflammatory response (NES = -1.46; <i>Q</i> = 0.18) were enriched in aoBTC. The median overall survival (OS) was 16.5 (eoBTC) versus 13.3 months (aoBTC), hazard ratio = 0.86, <i>P</i> = .004. The median OS by FGFR2 fusion (with fusion <i>v</i> without) was 21.7 versus 15.0 months (<i>P</i> = .47) for eoBTC and 18.6 versus 12.2 months (<i>P</i> < .001) for aoBTC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We identified crucial differences including higher prevalence of <i>FGFR2</i> fusions in eoBTC and variations in immunotherapy-related markers. Better outcomes in eoBTC were affected by the <i>FGFR2</i> fusion status. Our findings underscore the need for ensuring access to next-generation sequencing testing, including prompt identification of actionable targets.</p>","PeriodicalId":14797,"journal":{"name":"JCO precision oncology","volume":"8 ","pages":"e2400138"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO precision oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/PO.24.00138","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Early-onset biliary tract cancer (eoBTC) is among the fast-growing subset of early-onset cancers, yet little is known about its biology. We sought to identify novel molecular characteristics of eoBTC in relation to average-onset BTC (aoBTC) using a real-world multiomics data set.

Methods: The study comprised patients with BTC whose tumors underwent molecular analyses at Caris Life Sciences and were categorized by age (<50 years for eoBTC, ≥50 years for aoBTC). P values were adjusted for multiple testing and considered significant at Q < 0.05 (molecular comparisons) or Q < 0.25 (Gene Set Enrichment Analysis [GSEA]). Insurance claims data were used for survival analysis.

Results: The study included 5,587 patients with BTC (453 eoBTC, median age = 44 years and 5,134 aoBTC, median age = 68 years). FGFR2 fusion (15.7% in eoBTC v 5.9% in aoBTC) and NIPBL fusion (1.1% v 0%) were significantly more prevalent in eoBTC (both Q < 0.001). The interferon gamma-IFG score (fold change [FC], 1.1; Q = 0.01) and T-cell inflammation score (FC, 17.3; Q = 0.03) were significantly higher in aoBTC. On GSEA, angiogenesis was enriched in eoBTC (normalized enrichment score [NES] = 1.51; Q = 0.16), whereas IFG (NES = -1.58; Q = 0.06) and inflammatory response (NES = -1.46; Q = 0.18) were enriched in aoBTC. The median overall survival (OS) was 16.5 (eoBTC) versus 13.3 months (aoBTC), hazard ratio = 0.86, P = .004. The median OS by FGFR2 fusion (with fusion v without) was 21.7 versus 15.0 months (P = .47) for eoBTC and 18.6 versus 12.2 months (P < .001) for aoBTC.

Conclusion: We identified crucial differences including higher prevalence of FGFR2 fusions in eoBTC and variations in immunotherapy-related markers. Better outcomes in eoBTC were affected by the FGFR2 fusion status. Our findings underscore the need for ensuring access to next-generation sequencing testing, including prompt identification of actionable targets.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早发胆道癌与一般发病胆道癌的分子差异及其治疗意义
目的:早发胆道癌(eoBTC)是快速增长的早发癌亚群之一,但人们对其生物学特性知之甚少。我们试图利用真实世界的多组学数据集确定 eoBTC 与平均发病胆道癌(aoBTC)的新分子特征:研究对象包括BTC患者,他们的肿瘤在Caris生命科学公司进行了分子分析,并按年龄进行了分类(P值经多重检验调整,在Q<0.05(分子比较)或Q<0.25(基因组富集分析[GSEA])时具有显著性)。保险理赔数据用于生存分析:研究共纳入 5587 例 BTC 患者(453 例 eoBTC,中位年龄 = 44 岁;5134 例 aoBTC,中位年龄 = 68 岁)。表皮生长因子受体 2 融合(eoBTC 为 15.7%,aoBTC 为 5.9%)和 NIPBL 融合(eoBTC 为 1.1%,aoBTC 为 0%)在 eoBTC 中的发生率明显更高(两者的 Q 值均小于 0.001)。干扰素γ-IFG评分(折叠变化[FC],1.1;Q = 0.01)和T细胞炎症评分(FC,17.3;Q = 0.03)在aoBTC中明显更高。在 GSEA 中,血管生成在 eoBTC 中富集(归一化富集得分 [NES] = 1.51;Q = 0.16),而 IFG(NES = -1.58; Q = 0.06)和炎症反应(NES = -1.46; Q = 0.18)在 aoBTC 中富集。中位总生存期(OS)为16.5个月(eoBTC)对13.3个月(aoBTC),危险比=0.86,P=0.004。FGFR2融合(融合与未融合)的中位OS:eoBTC为21.7个月对15.0个月(P = .47),aoBTC为18.6个月对12.2个月(P < .001):我们发现了一些关键的差异,包括 eoBTC 中 FGFR2 融合的发生率更高,以及免疫疗法相关标志物的变化。FGFR2融合状态会影响eoBTC更好的预后。我们的研究结果强调了确保获得新一代测序检测的必要性,包括及时发现可采取行动的靶点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
363
期刊最新文献
DNA Damage Response Alterations Predict for Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Sensitivity in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Correlative Analysis of the SWOG S1314 Trial. Erratum: Tumor Characteristics Associated With Preoperatively Detectable Tumor-Informed Circulating Tumor DNA in Patients With Renal Masses Suspicious for Renal Cell Carcinoma. DNA Methylation Classes of Stage II and III Primary Melanomas and Their Clinical and Prognostic Significance. KRASG12D-Mutated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Clinical, Molecular, Immunologic, and Prognostic Features of a New Emerging Targeted Alteration. Neo-wt-RAS in ctDNA: Is It Worth Using Anti-EGFR Therapies?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1