Correction to “Improving undergraduate students' email etiquette with computer-based instruction”

IF 2.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of applied behavior analysis Pub Date : 2024-08-06 DOI:10.1002/jaba.2907
{"title":"Correction to “Improving undergraduate students' email etiquette with computer-based instruction”","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/jaba.2907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Farnsworth, T. G., &amp; Thompson, R. H. (2024). Improving undergraduate students' email etiquette with computer-based instruction. <i>Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis</i>, 57(3), 751–762. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.1074.</p><p>There were errors in Table 1. For checklist item 7, the description was published as, “Double space between signoff and signature (+1).” It should have been, “Single space between signoff and signature, and the signature is not indented (+1).” For checklist item 8, the description was published as, “Email sender's name one space below the signoff without indentation (+1).” It should have been, “Email sender's name appears in the email (+1).” The correct table is:</p><p>In the following sentence, “closed-ended questions” should have been “open-ended questions.” The correct sentence is: “The mean email checklist percentage for the <b>open-ended questions</b> (i.e., email rehearsal) was 88.8% (SD = 25.9) for section A and 95.4% (SD = 6.9) for section B.”</p><p>We apologize for the errors.</p>","PeriodicalId":14983,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied behavior analysis","volume":"57 4","pages":"1082"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jaba.2907","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied behavior analysis","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jaba.2907","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Farnsworth, T. G., & Thompson, R. H. (2024). Improving undergraduate students' email etiquette with computer-based instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 57(3), 751–762. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.1074.

There were errors in Table 1. For checklist item 7, the description was published as, “Double space between signoff and signature (+1).” It should have been, “Single space between signoff and signature, and the signature is not indented (+1).” For checklist item 8, the description was published as, “Email sender's name one space below the signoff without indentation (+1).” It should have been, “Email sender's name appears in the email (+1).” The correct table is:

In the following sentence, “closed-ended questions” should have been “open-ended questions.” The correct sentence is: “The mean email checklist percentage for the open-ended questions (i.e., email rehearsal) was 88.8% (SD = 25.9) for section A and 95.4% (SD = 6.9) for section B.”

We apologize for the errors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
更正 "通过计算机教学改善本科生的电子邮件礼仪"。
Farnsworth, T. G., & Thompson, R. H. (2024)。通过计算机教学提高本科生的电子邮件礼仪》。应用行为分析杂志》,57(3),751-762。https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.1074.There,表 1 中存在错误。检查表第 7 项的描述为 "签名与签名之间空两格 (+1)"。应该是 "签名与签名之间空一格,签名不缩进 (+1)"。对于核对表第 8 项,公布的描述是:"电子邮件发件人姓名在签名下方空一格,不缩进 (+1)"。应为 "电子邮件中出现发件人姓名 (+1)"。正确的表格是:在下面的句子中,"封闭式问题 "应为 "开放式问题"。正确的句子是"开放式问题(即电子邮件预演)的平均电子邮件核对表百分比在 A 部分为 88.8%(SD = 25.9),在 B 部分为 95.4%(SD = 6.9)。"我们对这些错误表示歉意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of applied behavior analysis
Journal of applied behavior analysis PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
20.70%
发文量
61
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the social acceptability of the Re-Connect concept: A smartphone-based, nonfinancial, contingency management intervention. Contingency management for monosubstance use disorders: Systematic review and assessment of predicted versus obtained effects. Choice versus no choice: Practical considerations for increasing choices. Functional analysis and treatment of problem behavior by domesticated canines. Effects of social interaction on leisure item preference and reinforcer efficacy for children with autism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1