Outcomes With Postrecurrence Systemic Therapy Following Adjuvant Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment for Resected Melanoma in CheckMate 238.

IF 42.1 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Journal of Clinical Oncology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1200/JCO.23.01448
Jeffrey Weber, Michele Del Vecchio, Mario Mandalá, Helen Gogas, Ana M Arance, Stephane Dalle, C Lance Cowey, Michael Schenker, Jean-Jacques Grob, Vanna Chiarion-Sileni, Iván Márquez-Rodas, Marcus O Butler, Anna Maria Di Giacomo, Luis de la Cruz-Merino, Petr Arenberger, Victoria Atkinson, Andrew Hill, Leslie A Fecher, Michael Millward, Nikhil I Khushalani, Paola Queirolo, Georgina V Long, Maurice Lobo, Margarita Askelson, Paolo A Ascierto, James Larkin
{"title":"Outcomes With Postrecurrence Systemic Therapy Following Adjuvant Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment for Resected Melanoma in CheckMate 238.","authors":"Jeffrey Weber, Michele Del Vecchio, Mario Mandalá, Helen Gogas, Ana M Arance, Stephane Dalle, C Lance Cowey, Michael Schenker, Jean-Jacques Grob, Vanna Chiarion-Sileni, Iván Márquez-Rodas, Marcus O Butler, Anna Maria Di Giacomo, Luis de la Cruz-Merino, Petr Arenberger, Victoria Atkinson, Andrew Hill, Leslie A Fecher, Michael Millward, Nikhil I Khushalani, Paola Queirolo, Georgina V Long, Maurice Lobo, Margarita Askelson, Paolo A Ascierto, James Larkin","doi":"10.1200/JCO.23.01448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In phase III CheckMate 238, adjuvant nivolumab significantly improved recurrence-free survival compared with ipilimumab in patients with resected stage IIIB-C/IV melanoma without a significant difference in overall survival (OS). Here, we investigate progression-free survival (PFS) and OS after postrecurrence systemic therapy.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Patients 15 years or older with resected stage IIIB-C/IV melanoma were stratified by stage and tumor PD-L1 status and randomly assigned to receive nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks, or ipilimumab 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four doses and then every 12 weeks for 1 year or until disease recurrence, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Patients with recurrence in each group were assessed for PFS and OS from subsequent systemic therapy (SST) initiation per recurrence timing (≤12 months [early] <i>v</i> >12 months [late] from initial therapy).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Recurrences occurred in 198 (44%) of 453 nivolumab-treated patients (122 early, 76 late) and 232 (51%) of 453 ipilimumab-treated patients (160 early, 72 late). Median PFS on next-line systemic therapy for nivolumab-treated patients recurring early versus late was 4.7 versus 12.4 months (24-month rates, 16% <i>v</i> 31%); median OS was 19.8 versus 42.8 months (24-month rates: 37% <i>v</i> 73%). In response to subsequent therapy, patients on nivolumab with late versus early recurrence were more likely to benefit from anti-PD-1 monotherapy. Nivolumab-treated patients with either an early or late recurrence benefitted from an ipilimumab-based therapy or targeted therapy, each with similar OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Postrecurrence survival was longer for patients who recurred >12 months. Patients on nivolumab who recurred early benefitted from SST but had better survival with ipilimumab-based regimens or targeted therapy compared with anti-PD-1 monotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"3702-3712"},"PeriodicalIF":42.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11527380/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.23.01448","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: In phase III CheckMate 238, adjuvant nivolumab significantly improved recurrence-free survival compared with ipilimumab in patients with resected stage IIIB-C/IV melanoma without a significant difference in overall survival (OS). Here, we investigate progression-free survival (PFS) and OS after postrecurrence systemic therapy.

Patients and methods: Patients 15 years or older with resected stage IIIB-C/IV melanoma were stratified by stage and tumor PD-L1 status and randomly assigned to receive nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks, or ipilimumab 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four doses and then every 12 weeks for 1 year or until disease recurrence, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Patients with recurrence in each group were assessed for PFS and OS from subsequent systemic therapy (SST) initiation per recurrence timing (≤12 months [early] v >12 months [late] from initial therapy).

Results: Recurrences occurred in 198 (44%) of 453 nivolumab-treated patients (122 early, 76 late) and 232 (51%) of 453 ipilimumab-treated patients (160 early, 72 late). Median PFS on next-line systemic therapy for nivolumab-treated patients recurring early versus late was 4.7 versus 12.4 months (24-month rates, 16% v 31%); median OS was 19.8 versus 42.8 months (24-month rates: 37% v 73%). In response to subsequent therapy, patients on nivolumab with late versus early recurrence were more likely to benefit from anti-PD-1 monotherapy. Nivolumab-treated patients with either an early or late recurrence benefitted from an ipilimumab-based therapy or targeted therapy, each with similar OS.

Conclusion: Postrecurrence survival was longer for patients who recurred >12 months. Patients on nivolumab who recurred early benefitted from SST but had better survival with ipilimumab-based regimens or targeted therapy compared with anti-PD-1 monotherapy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CheckMate 238 中已切除黑色素瘤辅助检查点抑制剂治疗后的复发后系统治疗效果。
目的:在III期CheckMate 238中,在切除的IIIB-C/IV期黑色素瘤患者中,与伊匹单抗相比,nivolumab辅助治疗可显著改善无复发生存期,但总生存期(OS)无明显差异。在此,我们研究了复发后系统治疗后的无进展生存期(PFS)和OS:15岁或15岁以上切除的IIIB-C/IV期黑色素瘤患者按分期和肿瘤PD-L1状态进行分层,随机分配接受尼妥珠单抗3 mg/kg,每2周一次,或伊匹单抗10 mg/kg,每3周一次,共4次,然后每12周一次,持续1年或直到疾病复发、出现不可接受的毒性或撤回同意。根据复发时间(初始治疗后≤12个月[早期]v >12个月[晚期])评估各组复发患者自后续系统治疗(SST)开始的PFS和OS:453名接受过尼伐单抗治疗的患者中有198人(44%)复发(122人早期复发,76人晚期复发),453名接受过伊匹单抗治疗的患者中有232人(51%)复发(160人早期复发,72人晚期复发)。早期复发与晚期复发的nivolumab治疗患者接受下一步系统治疗的中位PFS分别为4.7个月和12.4个月(24个月的比例为16%和31%);中位OS分别为19.8个月和42.8个月(24个月的比例为37%和73%)。在后续治疗方面,接受尼妥珠单抗治疗的晚期复发患者比早期复发患者更有可能从抗PD-1单药治疗中获益。接受尼妥珠单抗治疗的早期或晚期复发患者均可从基于伊匹单抗的治疗或靶向治疗中获益,两者的OS相似:结论:复发时间大于12个月的患者的复发后生存期更长。接受尼妥珠单抗治疗的早期复发患者可从SST中获益,但与抗PD-1单药治疗相比,以伊匹单抗为基础的治疗方案或靶向治疗的生存率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Journal of Clinical Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
41.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
8215
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Oncology serves its readers as the single most credible, authoritative resource for disseminating significant clinical oncology research. In print and in electronic format, JCO strives to publish the highest quality articles dedicated to clinical research. Original Reports remain the focus of JCO, but this scientific communication is enhanced by appropriately selected Editorials, Commentaries, Reviews, and other work that relate to the care of patients with cancer.
期刊最新文献
Intermittent or Continuous Panitumumab Plus Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Irinotecan for First-Line Treatment of RAS and BRAF Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The IMPROVE Trial. Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Platinum-Sensitive Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: A Randomized Trial on Survival Evaluation (HORSE; MITO-18). Effectiveness of a Cardiovascular Health Electronic Health Record Application for Cancer Survivors in Community Oncology Practice: Results From WF-1804CD. US Food and Drug Administration's Directive to Deal With Delayed Confirmatory Trials: Lessons From Pralatrexate and Belinostat for T-Cell Lymphoma. Improving Access to Patient-Focused, Decentralized Clinical Trials Requires Streamlined Regulatory Requirements: An ASCO Research Statement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1