Birth's transformative shift: a response to Waleszczyński.

IF 3.3 2区哲学 Q1 ETHICS Journal of Medical Ethics Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1136/jme-2024-110307

Prabhpal Singh

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Waleszczyński critiques my argument for why the relationship between a pregnant person and any fetus they carry is not a relationship between a parent and a child. I argue Waleszczyński does not show that my 'argument from potentiality' is inadequate, and I provide further justification for why birth marks a transformative shift into a moral relationship.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

出生的转变：对 Waleszczyński 的回应。

瓦列兹钦斯基批评了我的论点，即为什么孕妇与胎儿之间的关系不是父母与子女之间的关系。我认为瓦莱辛斯基并没有证明我的 "潜能论证 "是不充分的，我还进一步说明了为什么出生标志着道德关系的转变。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Medical Ethics 医学-医学：伦理

CiteScore

7.80

自引率

9.80%

发文量

164

审稿时长

4-8 weeks

期刊介绍： Journal of Medical Ethics is a leading international journal that reflects the whole field of medical ethics. The journal seeks to promote ethical reflection and conduct in scientific research and medical practice. It features articles on various ethical aspects of health care relevant to health care professionals, members of clinical ethics committees, medical ethics professionals, researchers and bioscientists, policy makers and patients. Subscribers to the Journal of Medical Ethics also receive Medical Humanities journal at no extra cost. JME is the official journal of the Institute of Medical Ethics.

期刊最新文献

How ectogestation can impact the gestational versus moral parenthood debate. If not a right to children because of gestation, then not a duty towards them either. Acknowledging the dual-interest gestationalist approach. (Un)equal treatment in the 'tobacco-free generation'. Gestation most certainly matters, but it need not involve an 'emotional relationship'.