Developing a new measure of retrospective body dissatisfaction: links to postnatal bonding and psychological well-being.

IF 2.1 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology Pub Date : 2024-08-06 DOI:10.1080/02646838.2024.2386077
Lydia B Munns, Anna E Crossland, Monique McPherson, Elena Panagiotopoulou, Catherine E J Preston
{"title":"Developing a new measure of retrospective body dissatisfaction: links to postnatal bonding and psychological well-being.","authors":"Lydia B Munns, Anna E Crossland, Monique McPherson, Elena Panagiotopoulou, Catherine E J Preston","doi":"10.1080/02646838.2024.2386077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pregnancy is a transformative time for women and their bodies, and therefore thoughts and feelings about the body understandably change during this period. While previous research has established the impact of body dissatisfaction on factors like antenatal attachment and maternal mental health, there is a notable gap in understanding its long-term effects on postnatal factors. This is often due to high attrition rates in longitudinal studies. Using retrospective measures could address this issue, however a measure of retrospective pregnant body dissatisfaction has not yet been identified.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This paper aimed to create a retrospective measure of pregnancy body dissatisfaction by adapting a previously validated measure. It also aimed to investigate the relationship between retrospective accounts of body dissatisfaction during pregnancy and postnatal anxiety, depression, and bonding.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Cross-sectional online survey data was collected from women postnatally (<i>N</i> = 404).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>An exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis identified a two-factor model of retrospective body dissatisfaction, adapted from the Body Understanding Measure for Pregnancy Scale, which was equivalent to two of the original subscales. Using this factor structure, linear regressions demonstrated that higher levels of retrospective pregnant body dissatisfaction were associated with elevated rates of postnatal anxiety and depression and lower bonding scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study successfully established a measure for assessing retrospective pregnant body dissatisfaction, potentially aiding future research. Additionally, it has highlighted the link between pregnant body dissatisfaction and postnatal levels of depression, anxiety, and bonding. Thus, improving the pregnant bodily experience may have the potential to enhance the postnatal experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":47721,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2024.2386077","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pregnancy is a transformative time for women and their bodies, and therefore thoughts and feelings about the body understandably change during this period. While previous research has established the impact of body dissatisfaction on factors like antenatal attachment and maternal mental health, there is a notable gap in understanding its long-term effects on postnatal factors. This is often due to high attrition rates in longitudinal studies. Using retrospective measures could address this issue, however a measure of retrospective pregnant body dissatisfaction has not yet been identified.

Aims: This paper aimed to create a retrospective measure of pregnancy body dissatisfaction by adapting a previously validated measure. It also aimed to investigate the relationship between retrospective accounts of body dissatisfaction during pregnancy and postnatal anxiety, depression, and bonding.

Method: Cross-sectional online survey data was collected from women postnatally (N = 404).

Findings: An exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis identified a two-factor model of retrospective body dissatisfaction, adapted from the Body Understanding Measure for Pregnancy Scale, which was equivalent to two of the original subscales. Using this factor structure, linear regressions demonstrated that higher levels of retrospective pregnant body dissatisfaction were associated with elevated rates of postnatal anxiety and depression and lower bonding scores.

Conclusions: This study successfully established a measure for assessing retrospective pregnant body dissatisfaction, potentially aiding future research. Additionally, it has highlighted the link between pregnant body dissatisfaction and postnatal levels of depression, anxiety, and bonding. Thus, improving the pregnant bodily experience may have the potential to enhance the postnatal experience.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发回溯性身体不满意度的新测量方法:与产后亲子关系和心理健康的联系。
背景介绍怀孕是妇女及其身体发生转变的时期,因此在此期间对身体的想法和感受发生变化是可以理解的。虽然以往的研究已经证实了身体不满意对产前依恋和产妇心理健康等因素的影响,但在了解其对产后因素的长期影响方面还存在明显差距。这通常是由于纵向研究中的高流失率造成的。目的:本文旨在通过改编之前经过验证的测量方法,建立一种孕期身体不满意度的回顾性测量方法。本文还旨在研究孕期身体不满意度的回顾性描述与产后焦虑、抑郁和亲子关系之间的关系:方法:收集产后妇女(N = 404)的横断面在线调查数据:探索性和确认性因子分析确定了一个回顾性身体不满意度的双因子模型,该模型改编自妊娠期身体了解量表,相当于原始分量表中的两个分量表。利用这一因子结构,线性回归结果表明,较高程度的回顾性孕期身体不满意与产后焦虑和抑郁率升高以及较低的亲子关系得分有关:本研究成功建立了一种评估孕妇身体不满意度的方法,可能有助于未来的研究。此外,它还强调了孕妇身体不满意与产后抑郁、焦虑和亲子关系之间的联系。因此,改善孕妇的身体体验有可能改善产后体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology
Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology reports and reviews outstanding research on psychological, behavioural, medical and social aspects of human reproduction, pregnancy and infancy. Medical topics focus on obstetrics and gynaecology, paediatrics and psychiatry. The growing work in relevant aspects of medical communication and medical sociology are also covered. Relevant psychological work includes developmental psychology, clinical psychology, social psychology, behavioural medicine, psychology of women and health psychology. Research into psychological aspects of midwifery, health visiting and nursing is central to the interests of the Journal. The Journal is of special value to those concerned with interdisciplinary issues. As a result, the Journal is of particular interest to those concerned with fundamental processes in behaviour and to issues of health promotion and service organization.
期刊最新文献
Midwives' perspectives and perceptions in relation to perinatal psychotic-like experiences: a qualitative study. Translation and validation of the Czech Partner version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R) A hopeful future: a qualitative investigation of positive psychological functioning in young mothers Mother-child bond and its relationship with maternal postpartum depression. Psychological Well-being of Patients in Reproductive Medicine Center: Clinicians' Perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1