Primary Care Support Tools for Digestive Health Care: A Mixed Method Study.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Pub Date : 2024-07-24 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/6805365
Mubashir Arain, Leanne Reeb, Rebecca C Miyagishima, Julia Carter, Kerri L Novak
{"title":"Primary Care Support Tools for Digestive Health Care: A Mixed Method Study.","authors":"Mubashir Arain, Leanne Reeb, Rebecca C Miyagishima, Julia Carter, Kerri L Novak","doi":"10.1155/2024/6805365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To address the increasing demands for gastroenterology specialty care and increasing wait times, centralized access and triage (CAT) systems, telephone support, and clinical care pathways were implemented to streamline referrals and support management of low-risk gastrointestinal (GI) conditions in the primary care medical home. This study aimed to understand primary care providers (PCPs) and GI specialists' perceptions of these supports, factors that affect support implementation and identify barriers and facilitators for implementing supports from both PCP and GI specialists' perspectives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a mixed method study including surveys and interviews with PCPs and GI specialists. Online surveys and semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted from July 2022 to September 2022. All interviews were transcribed and coded to perform a thematic analysis. Survey data were analyzed in SPSS version 25. Descriptive statistics were employed to summarize and describe the data collected. Inferential statistics were used to identify associations and relationships within the dataset. <i>T</i>-test and chi-square tests were applied at 95% confidence level, with a <i>p</i> value <0.05 (two-sided) considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 36 PCPs responded to the survey. Most respondents were working full-time (73.5%, <i>n</i> = 25) and were female (73.5%, <i>n</i> = 25). Overall, 42% used the pathways regularly, 48% (<i>n</i> = 16) used them occasionally, and very few (9.1%, <i>n</i> = 3) said they were aware but had not used pathways. Overall, PCPs were satisfied with CAT processes and the use of primary care pathways, recognizing the importance of fair and equitable access to specialty care. Specific processes in CAT for vulnerable populations and patients using walk-in clinics were recognized as a limitation, given the lack of ease in completing the required testing and follow-up needed when utilizing the care pathway. Of the 112 GI specialists who received the survey, 28 (25%) completed it, with males (50.0%, <i>n</i> = 14) and females (39.2%, <i>n</i> = 11), remainder no response. Most participate in CAT (73.9%, <i>n</i> = 17) and were remunerated by an alternative relationship plan (ARP) (53.6%, <i>n</i> = 15). Overall, GIs were satisfied with central triaging and primary care pathways, reducing unnecessary time and resource expenditure for referrals. There were statistically significant differences in perceptions among fee for service and alternative relationship plan GI specialists regarding the effectiveness of CAT in improving access and use of health system resources.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, PCPs and GI specialists believe utilizing CAT and primary care pathways improves referral quality, reduces resource expenditure, and provides fair and equitable access to GI specialty services. Improvement in CAT processes with improved pathway awareness may reduce unnecessary referrals.</p>","PeriodicalId":48755,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11300069/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/6805365","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To address the increasing demands for gastroenterology specialty care and increasing wait times, centralized access and triage (CAT) systems, telephone support, and clinical care pathways were implemented to streamline referrals and support management of low-risk gastrointestinal (GI) conditions in the primary care medical home. This study aimed to understand primary care providers (PCPs) and GI specialists' perceptions of these supports, factors that affect support implementation and identify barriers and facilitators for implementing supports from both PCP and GI specialists' perspectives.

Methods: We conducted a mixed method study including surveys and interviews with PCPs and GI specialists. Online surveys and semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted from July 2022 to September 2022. All interviews were transcribed and coded to perform a thematic analysis. Survey data were analyzed in SPSS version 25. Descriptive statistics were employed to summarize and describe the data collected. Inferential statistics were used to identify associations and relationships within the dataset. T-test and chi-square tests were applied at 95% confidence level, with a p value <0.05 (two-sided) considered statistically significant.

Results: A total of 36 PCPs responded to the survey. Most respondents were working full-time (73.5%, n = 25) and were female (73.5%, n = 25). Overall, 42% used the pathways regularly, 48% (n = 16) used them occasionally, and very few (9.1%, n = 3) said they were aware but had not used pathways. Overall, PCPs were satisfied with CAT processes and the use of primary care pathways, recognizing the importance of fair and equitable access to specialty care. Specific processes in CAT for vulnerable populations and patients using walk-in clinics were recognized as a limitation, given the lack of ease in completing the required testing and follow-up needed when utilizing the care pathway. Of the 112 GI specialists who received the survey, 28 (25%) completed it, with males (50.0%, n = 14) and females (39.2%, n = 11), remainder no response. Most participate in CAT (73.9%, n = 17) and were remunerated by an alternative relationship plan (ARP) (53.6%, n = 15). Overall, GIs were satisfied with central triaging and primary care pathways, reducing unnecessary time and resource expenditure for referrals. There were statistically significant differences in perceptions among fee for service and alternative relationship plan GI specialists regarding the effectiveness of CAT in improving access and use of health system resources.

Conclusion: Overall, PCPs and GI specialists believe utilizing CAT and primary care pathways improves referral quality, reduces resource expenditure, and provides fair and equitable access to GI specialty services. Improvement in CAT processes with improved pathway awareness may reduce unnecessary referrals.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
消化系统保健的初级保健支持工具:混合方法研究。
背景:为了应对日益增长的胃肠病专科护理需求和不断增加的等待时间,实施了集中访问和分流(CAT)系统、电话支持和临床护理路径,以简化转诊并支持初级保健医疗之家对低风险胃肠病(GI)的管理。本研究旨在了解初级保健提供者(PCP)和消化道专科医生对这些支持的看法、影响支持实施的因素,并从初级保健提供者和消化道专科医生的角度找出实施支持的障碍和促进因素:我们开展了一项混合方法研究,包括对初级保健医生和消化道专家进行调查和访谈。在线调查和半结构化定性访谈于 2022 年 7 月至 2022 年 9 月进行。对所有访谈进行了转录和编码,以进行主题分析。调查数据在 SPSS 25 版本中进行分析。描述性统计用于总结和描述收集到的数据。推断统计用于确定数据集中的关联和关系。采用置信度为 95% 的 T 检验和卡方检验,P 值为 结果:共有 36 名初级保健医生回复了调查。大多数受访者为全职(73.5%,n = 25)和女性(73.5%,n = 25)。总体而言,42% 的受访者经常使用路径,48%(n = 16)的受访者偶尔使用路径,极少数(9.1%,n = 3)的受访者表示知道但未使用路径。总体而言,初级保健医生对 CAT 流程和初级保健路径的使用表示满意,并认识到公平、公正地获得专科医疗服务的重要性。他们认为,CAT 中针对弱势人群和使用无预约门诊的患者的特定流程是一个局限,因为在使用护理路径时,不容易完成所需的检测和随访。在收到调查问卷的 112 名消化道专科医生中,有 28 人(25%)完成了问卷,其中男性(50.0%,n=14)和女性(39.2%,n=11)没有回复。大多数人参加了计算机辅助医疗(CAT)(73.9%,n = 17),并通过替代关系计划(ARP)获得报酬(53.6%,n = 15)。总体而言,消化内科医生对中央分流和初级医疗路径感到满意,因为这减少了转诊所需的不必要时间和资源支出。对于 CAT 在改善医疗系统资源的获取和使用方面的有效性,收费服务和替代关系计划的消化道专科医生之间的看法存在统计学上的显著差异:总体而言,初级保健医生和消化道专科医生认为,利用 CAT 和初级保健路径可提高转诊质量、减少资源支出,并提供公平、公正的消化道专科服务。通过提高对路径的认识来改进 CAT 流程,可以减少不必要的转诊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
37 weeks
期刊介绍: Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology is a peer-reviewed, open access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of gastroenterology and liver disease - medicine and surgery. The Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology is sponsored by the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology and the Canadian Association for the Study of the Liver.
期刊最新文献
Acute Variceal Hemorrhage in Germany-A Nationwide Study of 65,357 Hospitalized Cases: Variceal Hemorrhage in Germany. The Predictive Value of Time-Varying Noninvasive Scores on Long-Term Prognosis of NAFLD in South Korea. Feasibility and Acceptability of Antenatal Hepatitis C Screening: A Pilot Study. Primary Care Support Tools for Digestive Health Care: A Mixed Method Study. Long-Term Treatment with Bulevirtide in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis D and Advanced Chronic Liver Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1