The Content, Reliability, and Quality of Insulin Pen Injection Videos on YouTube as Patient Education Resource.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1097/CIN.0000000000001182
Seçil Gülhan Güner, Müge Tezel, Aysel Özsaban
{"title":"The Content, Reliability, and Quality of Insulin Pen Injection Videos on YouTube as Patient Education Resource.","authors":"Seçil Gülhan Güner, Müge Tezel, Aysel Özsaban","doi":"10.1097/CIN.0000000000001182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study, conducted using the descriptive-correlational model, aims to evaluate the content, reliability, and quality of insulin pen injection videos on YouTube. The video-sharing platform YouTube was searched with the keyword \"insulin pen injection.\" Of the 101 relevant videos, 49 were included in the study. Video contents were evaluated independently by the \"Insulin Pen Injection Guide Form,\" their reliability by the \"DISCERN Questionnaire,\" and their quality by the \"Global Quality Scale.\" Of the 49 videos that met the inclusion criteria, 55.1% contained useful information, and 44.8% contained misleading information. The videos that were found to be useful were longer and had higher DISCERN and content scores. A statistically significant positive correlation was determined between the videos' DISCERN and content scores (r = 0.772, P < .001). More than half of the insulin pen injection videos available on YouTube are helpful, but the number of misleading videos is close to the helpful ones. Thus, it may be recommended that the insulin pen injection videos be evaluated by experts in line with evidence-based guidelines before sharing them on YouTube.</p>","PeriodicalId":50694,"journal":{"name":"Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000001182","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study, conducted using the descriptive-correlational model, aims to evaluate the content, reliability, and quality of insulin pen injection videos on YouTube. The video-sharing platform YouTube was searched with the keyword "insulin pen injection." Of the 101 relevant videos, 49 were included in the study. Video contents were evaluated independently by the "Insulin Pen Injection Guide Form," their reliability by the "DISCERN Questionnaire," and their quality by the "Global Quality Scale." Of the 49 videos that met the inclusion criteria, 55.1% contained useful information, and 44.8% contained misleading information. The videos that were found to be useful were longer and had higher DISCERN and content scores. A statistically significant positive correlation was determined between the videos' DISCERN and content scores (r = 0.772, P < .001). More than half of the insulin pen injection videos available on YouTube are helpful, but the number of misleading videos is close to the helpful ones. Thus, it may be recommended that the insulin pen injection videos be evaluated by experts in line with evidence-based guidelines before sharing them on YouTube.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
YouTube 上作为患者教育资源的胰岛素笔注射视频的内容、可靠性和质量。
本研究采用描述-相关模型,旨在评估 YouTube 上胰岛素笔注射视频的内容、可靠性和质量。在 YouTube 视频共享平台上搜索关键词 "胰岛素笔注射"。在 101 个相关视频中,49 个被纳入研究。视频内容由 "胰岛素笔注射指南表 "独立评估,视频可靠性由 "DISCERN问卷 "评估,视频质量由 "总体质量量表 "评估。在符合纳入标准的 49 部视频中,55.1% 包含有用信息,44.8% 包含误导信息。被认为有用的视频篇幅较长,且 DISCERN 和内容得分较高。视频的 DISCERN 和内容得分之间存在统计学意义上的正相关(r = 0.772,P < .001)。在 YouTube 上提供的胰岛素笔注射视频中,半数以上是有用的,但误导性视频的数量与有用视频的数量接近。因此,建议在YouTube上分享胰岛素笔注射视频之前,由专家根据循证指南对其进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing
Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing 工程技术-护理
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
15.40%
发文量
248
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For over 30 years, CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing has been at the interface of the science of information and the art of nursing, publishing articles on the latest developments in nursing informatics, research, education and administrative of health information technology. CIN connects you with colleagues as they share knowledge on implementation of electronic health records systems, design decision-support systems, incorporate evidence-based healthcare in practice, explore point-of-care computing in practice and education, and conceptually integrate nursing languages and standard data sets. Continuing education contact hours are available in every issue.
期刊最新文献
Codesigning an E-Health Intervention for Surgery Preparation and Recovery. Hotspots and Global Trends of Nursing Research on Mobile Applications in Nursing From 2012 to 2023: A Bibliometric Analysis. Optimize and Thrive: An Electronic Health Record Optimization Program Case Study. Bedside Nurse Documentation Practices: At the Patient Bedside or Not? Construction of an Early Risk Prediction Model for Type 2 Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Based on Random Forest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1