Effect of ensifentrine on dyspnea in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: pooled analysis of the ENHANCE trials.

Expert review of respiratory medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-08 DOI:10.1080/17476348.2024.2389960
Donald A Mahler, Surya P Bhatt, Tara Rheault, Daniel Reyner, Thomas Bengtsson, Amy Dixon, Kathleen Rickard, Dave Singh
{"title":"Effect of ensifentrine on dyspnea in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: pooled analysis of the ENHANCE trials.","authors":"Donald A Mahler, Surya P Bhatt, Tara Rheault, Daniel Reyner, Thomas Bengtsson, Amy Dixon, Kathleen Rickard, Dave Singh","doi":"10.1080/17476348.2024.2389960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dyspnea is a critical component of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We report the effect of ensifentrine, a novel PDE3/PDE4 inhibitor, on dyspnea using pooled data from the Phase 3 ENHANCE-1/2 trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The pooled population (ensifentrine, <i>n</i> = 975; placebo, <i>n</i> = 574) included patients aged 40-80 years with post-bronchodilator FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC <0.7, FEV<sub>1</sub> 30-70% predicted, mMRC Dyspnea Scale score ≥2, and a smoking history ≥10 pack-years. Patients taking dual LAMA/LABA or LAMA/LABA/ICS triple therapy were excluded. Dyspnea measures included the Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI), Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms (E-RS), and rescue medication use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 24 weeks, ensifentrine significantly improved TDI scores (least-squares mean difference, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.64, 1.30; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and across all TDI subdomains. Ensifentrine-treated patients were more likely to be TDI responders at week 24 (<i>p</i> < 0.001), which was consistent across clinically relevant subgroups. Ensifentrine-treated patients had improved E-RS breathlessness subdomain scores (<i>p</i> = 0.053) and reduced rescue medication use (<i>p</i> = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ensifentrine produced clinically meaningful improvements in multiple dyspnea measures in patients with symptomatic, moderate-to-severe COPD. A limitation of this study was the exclusion of patients taking dual LAMA/LABA and LAMA/LABA/ICS triple therapy.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>www.clinicaltrials.gov identifiers are ENHANCE-1: NCT04535986; ENHANCE-2: NCT04542057.</p>","PeriodicalId":94007,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of respiratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"645-654"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert review of respiratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17476348.2024.2389960","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dyspnea is a critical component of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We report the effect of ensifentrine, a novel PDE3/PDE4 inhibitor, on dyspnea using pooled data from the Phase 3 ENHANCE-1/2 trials.

Methods: The pooled population (ensifentrine, n = 975; placebo, n = 574) included patients aged 40-80 years with post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC <0.7, FEV1 30-70% predicted, mMRC Dyspnea Scale score ≥2, and a smoking history ≥10 pack-years. Patients taking dual LAMA/LABA or LAMA/LABA/ICS triple therapy were excluded. Dyspnea measures included the Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI), Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms (E-RS), and rescue medication use.

Results: After 24 weeks, ensifentrine significantly improved TDI scores (least-squares mean difference, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.64, 1.30; p < 0.001) and across all TDI subdomains. Ensifentrine-treated patients were more likely to be TDI responders at week 24 (p < 0.001), which was consistent across clinically relevant subgroups. Ensifentrine-treated patients had improved E-RS breathlessness subdomain scores (p = 0.053) and reduced rescue medication use (p = 0.002).

Conclusion: Ensifentrine produced clinically meaningful improvements in multiple dyspnea measures in patients with symptomatic, moderate-to-severe COPD. A limitation of this study was the exclusion of patients taking dual LAMA/LABA and LAMA/LABA/ICS triple therapy.

Clinical trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov identifiers are ENHANCE-1: NCT04535986; ENHANCE-2: NCT04542057.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
安思芬特林对中重度慢性阻塞性肺病患者呼吸困难的影响:ENHANCE 试验的汇总分析。
背景:呼吸困难是慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)的一个重要组成部分。Ensifentrine 是一种新型 PDE3/PDE4 抑制剂,在 ENHANCE-1/2 3 期临床试验中进行了评估。在此,我们利用ENHANCE试验的汇总数据报告了安思芬特林对呼吸困难的影响:汇总人群(依西芬太尼,n = 975;安慰剂,n = 574)包括年龄在 40-80 岁、支气管扩张后 FEV1/FVC 1 预测值在 30%-70% 之间、mMRC 呼吸困难量表评分≥ 2 分、吸烟史≥ 10 包年的患者。服用 LAMA/LABA 双联疗法或 LAMA/LABA/ICS 三联疗法的患者除外。测量呼吸困难的指标包括过渡性呼吸困难指数(TDI)、呼吸道症状评估(E-RS)和抢救药物的使用:24周后,安思芬特林可显著改善TDI评分(最小二乘平均差,0.97;95% CI,0.64,1.30;p p = 0.053),并减少抢救用药(p = 0.002)。最常见的不良反应是背痛(安赛芬特林,1.8% vs 安慰剂,1.0%)、高血压(1.7% vs 0.9%)、尿路感染(1.3% vs 1.0%)、腹泻(1.0% vs 0.7%):结论:对于有症状的中度至重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者,安非他酮能改善多种呼吸困难指标,具有临床意义。本研究的局限性在于排除了服用LAMA/LABA双重疗法和LAMA/LABA/ICS三联疗法的患者。临床试验注册:www.clinicaltrials.gov identifiers are ENHANCE-1: NCT04535986; ENHANCE-2: NCT04542057.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Current insights into the clinico-pathologic characteristics of lung cancer in women. Elevated serum tumor-associated antigens in patients with interstitial lung disease: a retrospective study on clinical features and prognosis. Demographic and regional trends in asthma mortality in the United States, 1999-2020. Comparison of effectiveness and safety between baricitinib and tocilizumab in severe COVID-19: a retrospective study. Interpretation of cardiopulmonary exercise test by GPT - promising tool as a first step to identify normal results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1