The Intersection of Intimate Partner Violence, Strangulation, and Brain Injury Screening: A Pilot Project.

Adenike Gbadebo
{"title":"The Intersection of Intimate Partner Violence, Strangulation, and Brain Injury Screening: A Pilot Project.","authors":"Adenike Gbadebo","doi":"10.1097/JFN.0000000000000506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Survivors of intimate partner violence are at a high risk for having a brain injury because of high rates of strangulation and head and face injuries sustained from physical abuse. In addition to acute physical injuries, survivors experience various health complications.</p><p><strong>Problem: </strong>Many survivors do not seek medical attention for their injuries, and when they do, their brain injury often goes unrecognized and untreated. Research indicates that screening for brain injury can be an effective intervention to increase the identification of brain injuries and medical referrals for diagnosis and treatment. Unfortunately, brain injury screening is not a standard of care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Shelter-seeking clients were routinely screened for brain injury using a modified HELPS screening tool. A positive screen prompted a medical referral.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>A modified HELPS screening tool was utilized with permission for the project.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Before implementation, 36 individuals entered shelter, 0 were screened for brain injury, and the medical referral rate was 19.4% (n = 7). After implementation, 40 clients entered shelter, 36 were screened for brain injury, 77.8% (n = 28) screened positive, and the medical referral rate was 80.6% (n = 29).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Brain injury screening may be an effective evidence-based intervention for shelter-seeking survivors of intimate partner violence to increase medical referrals.</p>","PeriodicalId":94079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forensic nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JFN.0000000000000506","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Survivors of intimate partner violence are at a high risk for having a brain injury because of high rates of strangulation and head and face injuries sustained from physical abuse. In addition to acute physical injuries, survivors experience various health complications.

Problem: Many survivors do not seek medical attention for their injuries, and when they do, their brain injury often goes unrecognized and untreated. Research indicates that screening for brain injury can be an effective intervention to increase the identification of brain injuries and medical referrals for diagnosis and treatment. Unfortunately, brain injury screening is not a standard of care.

Methods: Shelter-seeking clients were routinely screened for brain injury using a modified HELPS screening tool. A positive screen prompted a medical referral.

Intervention: A modified HELPS screening tool was utilized with permission for the project.

Results: Before implementation, 36 individuals entered shelter, 0 were screened for brain injury, and the medical referral rate was 19.4% (n = 7). After implementation, 40 clients entered shelter, 36 were screened for brain injury, 77.8% (n = 28) screened positive, and the medical referral rate was 80.6% (n = 29).

Conclusions: Brain injury screening may be an effective evidence-based intervention for shelter-seeking survivors of intimate partner violence to increase medical referrals.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亲密伴侣暴力、勒死和脑损伤筛查的交叉点:试点项目。
背景:亲密伴侣暴力幸存者是脑损伤的高危人群,因为身体虐待造成的勒颈、头部和脸部伤害的发生率很高。问题:许多幸存者在受伤后并没有及时就医,即使就医,他们的脑损伤也往往得不到及时发现和治疗。研究表明,脑损伤筛查是一种有效的干预措施,可以提高脑损伤的识别率和转诊率,以便进行诊断和治疗。遗憾的是,脑损伤筛查并非护理标准:方法:使用改良的 HELPS 筛查工具对寻求庇护的客户进行常规脑损伤筛查。干预措施:使用改良的 HELPS 筛查工具对寻求庇护的客户进行脑损伤常规筛查,筛查结果呈阳性的客户需要转诊:结果:在实施前,有 36 人进入庇护所,而在实施后,他们的脑损伤筛查结果均为阳性:实施前,36 人进入庇护所,0 人接受了脑损伤筛查,医疗转介率为 19.4%(n = 7)。实施后,40 名客户进入庇护所,36 人接受了脑损伤筛查,77.8%(n = 28)筛查结果呈阳性,医疗转诊率为 80.6%(n = 29):脑损伤筛查对于寻求庇护所的亲密伴侣暴力幸存者来说可能是一项有效的循证干预措施,可提高医疗转诊率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Forensic Mental Health Nurses' Perceptions and Experiences of Trauma-Informed Care in a High-Secure Hospital. A Canadian Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner's Personal Reflection and Ongoing Questioning of Vicarious Trauma. Emergency Department Workers' Perceived Support and Emotional Impact After Workplace Violence. Reporting Intimate Partner Violence in the Healthcare Setting. Pain During Incarceration: Searching for Safety in Hypermasculine Correctional Settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1