Toward precision medical education: Characterizing individual residents' clinical experiences throughout training.

Carolyn B Drake, David W Rhee, Neha Panigrahy, Lauren Heery, Eduardo Iturrate, David T Stern, Daniel J Sartori
{"title":"Toward precision medical education: Characterizing individual residents' clinical experiences throughout training.","authors":"Carolyn B Drake, David W Rhee, Neha Panigrahy, Lauren Heery, Eduardo Iturrate, David T Stern, Daniel J Sartori","doi":"10.1002/jhm.13471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the central role of experiential learning in residency training, the actual clinical experiences residents participate in are not well characterized. A better understanding of the type, volume, and variation in residents' clinical experiences is essential to support precision medical education strategies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We sought to characterize the entirety of the clinical experiences had by individual internal medicine residents throughout their time in training.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We evaluated the clinical experiences of medicine residents (n = 51) who completed training at NYU Grossman School of Medicine's Brooklyn campus between 2020 and 2023. Residents' inpatient and outpatient experiences were identified using notes written, orders placed, and care team sign-ins; principal ICD-10 codes for each encounter were converted into medical content categories using a previously described crosswalk tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 152,426 clinical encounters with available ICD-10 codes, 132,284 were mapped to medical content categories (94.5% capture). Residents' clinical experiences were particularly enriched in infectious and cardiovascular disease; most had very little exposure to allergy, dermatology, oncology, or rheumatology. Some trainees saw twice as many cases in a given content area as did others. There was little concordance between actual frequency of clinical experience and expected content frequency on the ABIM certification exam.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Individual residents' clinical experiences in training vary widely, both in number and in type. Characterizing these experiences paves the way for exploration of the relationships between clinical exposure and educational outcomes, and for the implementation of precision education strategies that could fill residents' experiential gaps and complement strengths with targeted educational interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":94084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hospital medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.13471","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the central role of experiential learning in residency training, the actual clinical experiences residents participate in are not well characterized. A better understanding of the type, volume, and variation in residents' clinical experiences is essential to support precision medical education strategies.

Objective: We sought to characterize the entirety of the clinical experiences had by individual internal medicine residents throughout their time in training.

Method: We evaluated the clinical experiences of medicine residents (n = 51) who completed training at NYU Grossman School of Medicine's Brooklyn campus between 2020 and 2023. Residents' inpatient and outpatient experiences were identified using notes written, orders placed, and care team sign-ins; principal ICD-10 codes for each encounter were converted into medical content categories using a previously described crosswalk tool.

Results: Of 152,426 clinical encounters with available ICD-10 codes, 132,284 were mapped to medical content categories (94.5% capture). Residents' clinical experiences were particularly enriched in infectious and cardiovascular disease; most had very little exposure to allergy, dermatology, oncology, or rheumatology. Some trainees saw twice as many cases in a given content area as did others. There was little concordance between actual frequency of clinical experience and expected content frequency on the ABIM certification exam.

Conclusions: Individual residents' clinical experiences in training vary widely, both in number and in type. Characterizing these experiences paves the way for exploration of the relationships between clinical exposure and educational outcomes, and for the implementation of precision education strategies that could fill residents' experiential gaps and complement strengths with targeted educational interventions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实现精准医学教育:描述住院医师个人在整个培训期间的临床经验。
背景:尽管体验式学习在住院医师培训中发挥着核心作用,但住院医师参与的实际临床经验并没有得到很好的描述。更好地了解住院医师临床经验的类型、数量和差异对于支持精准医学教育策略至关重要:我们试图描述内科住院医师在整个培训期间的全部临床经验:我们评估了 2020 年至 2023 年期间在纽约大学格罗斯曼医学院布鲁克林校区完成培训的内科住院医师(n = 51)的临床经验。住院医师的住院和门诊经历是通过书写的笔记、下达的医嘱和护理团队的签到来确定的;每次诊疗的主要 ICD-10 编码是通过之前描述的交叉工具转换成医疗内容类别的:在 152,426 次有 ICD-10 代码的临床实践中,132,284 次被映射到医疗内容类别(94.5% 的捕获率)。住院医师的临床经验在传染病和心血管疾病方面尤为丰富;大多数住院医师很少接触过敏症、皮肤病、肿瘤或风湿病。一些学员在特定内容领域的病例数是其他学员的两倍。临床经验的实际频率与 ABIM 认证考试的预期内容频率之间几乎不一致:结论:住院医师个人在培训期间的临床经验在数量和类型上都存在很大差异。了解这些经历的特点有助于探索临床接触与教育成果之间的关系,也有助于实施精准教育策略,从而弥补住院医师的经验差距,并通过有针对性的教育干预措施取长补短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessing the impact of workload and clinician experience on patient throughput: A multicenter study. Guideline concordance of electronic health record order sets for hospital-based treatment of alcohol withdrawal syndrome. Methodological progress note: Purposeful sampling in qualitative research. Streamlining diuresis: A quality improvement approach to implementing a sodium-based predictive diuresis protocol. From rounds to retweets: A digital media fellowship perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1