Prescribing patterns and persistence of biological therapies for psoriasis management: a retrospective cohort study from Saudi Arabia.

Ahmad Alamer, Wejdan Alyazidi, Saad Aldosari, Fatimah Mobarki, Sarah Almakki, Abdullah Alahmari, Mukhtar Alomar, Ziyad Almalki, Tuqa Alkaff, Mohammad Fazel
{"title":"Prescribing patterns and persistence of biological therapies for psoriasis management: a retrospective cohort study from Saudi Arabia.","authors":"Ahmad Alamer, Wejdan Alyazidi, Saad Aldosari, Fatimah Mobarki, Sarah Almakki, Abdullah Alahmari, Mukhtar Alomar, Ziyad Almalki, Tuqa Alkaff, Mohammad Fazel","doi":"10.1080/09546634.2024.2386973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biological therapies are effective for psoriasis, but patient responses vary, often requiring therapy switching or discontinuation.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify physicians' prescribing patterns of biological therapies at a referral tertiary center in Saudi Arabia and assess the probability of biologic persistence following treatment initiation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study of biologic-naïve adult psoriasis patients who initiated therapy from October 2013 to July 2022 in Dammam. Descriptive statistics and a Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluated treatment persistence at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 151 patients received adalimumab (<i>n</i> = 89), etanercept (<i>n</i> = 17), risankizumab (<i>n</i> = 30), ustekinumab (<i>n</i> = 14), and ixekizumab (<i>n</i> = 1). At 6 months, all therapies demonstrated 100% persistence. At 12 months, persistence was highest for ustekinumab (100%) and lowest for etanercept (88.2%). At 24 months, ustekinumab maintained 100% persistence, followed by risankizumab (96.6%), adalimumab (94.3%), and etanercept (76.4%). At 36 months, risankizumab had the highest persistence (96.6%), followed by adalimumab (83.1%), ustekinumab (78%), and etanercept (70.6%). The most common reasons for discontinuation were lack of effectiveness and intolerability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study shows changing psoriasis treatment patterns with new therapies. Risankizumab demonstrated high long-term persistence, while etanercept and ustekinumab showed declining persistence, suggesting evolving treatment considerations.</p>","PeriodicalId":94235,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of dermatological treatment","volume":"35 1","pages":"2386973"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of dermatological treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2024.2386973","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Biological therapies are effective for psoriasis, but patient responses vary, often requiring therapy switching or discontinuation.

Objectives: To identify physicians' prescribing patterns of biological therapies at a referral tertiary center in Saudi Arabia and assess the probability of biologic persistence following treatment initiation.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of biologic-naïve adult psoriasis patients who initiated therapy from October 2013 to July 2022 in Dammam. Descriptive statistics and a Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluated treatment persistence at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months.

Results: A total of 151 patients received adalimumab (n = 89), etanercept (n = 17), risankizumab (n = 30), ustekinumab (n = 14), and ixekizumab (n = 1). At 6 months, all therapies demonstrated 100% persistence. At 12 months, persistence was highest for ustekinumab (100%) and lowest for etanercept (88.2%). At 24 months, ustekinumab maintained 100% persistence, followed by risankizumab (96.6%), adalimumab (94.3%), and etanercept (76.4%). At 36 months, risankizumab had the highest persistence (96.6%), followed by adalimumab (83.1%), ustekinumab (78%), and etanercept (70.6%). The most common reasons for discontinuation were lack of effectiveness and intolerability.

Conclusion: This study shows changing psoriasis treatment patterns with new therapies. Risankizumab demonstrated high long-term persistence, while etanercept and ustekinumab showed declining persistence, suggesting evolving treatment considerations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于银屑病治疗的生物疗法的处方模式和持续性:沙特阿拉伯的一项回顾性队列研究。
背景:生物疗法对银屑病有效,但患者的反应各不相同:生物疗法对银屑病有效,但患者的反应各不相同,往往需要更换疗法或中断治疗:目的:确定沙特阿拉伯一家三级转诊中心的医生开具生物疗法处方的模式,并评估开始治疗后持续使用生物疗法的可能性:我们对2013年10月至2022年7月期间在达曼开始治疗的生物制剂无效成人银屑病患者进行了一项回顾性研究。描述性统计和 Kaplan-Meier 分析评估了 6、12、24 和 36 个月的治疗持续率:共有151名患者接受了阿达木单抗(89人)、依那西普(17人)、利桑珠单抗(30人)、乌斯特库单抗(14人)和ixekizumab(1人)治疗。6 个月时,所有疗法的持续率均为 100%。12 个月时,乌司替库单抗的持续率最高(100%),依那西普最低(88.2%)。24 个月时,ustekinumab 的持续率为 100%,其次是 risankizumab(96.6%)、adalimumab(94.3%)和 etanercept(76.4%)。36 个月时,利坦珠单抗的持续率最高(96.6%),其次是阿达木单抗(83.1%)、乌斯特库单抗(78%)和依那西普(70.6%)。最常见的停药原因是缺乏疗效和无法耐受:结论:这项研究表明,新疗法改变了银屑病的治疗模式。结论:这项研究表明,随着新疗法的出现,银屑病的治疗模式也在发生变化。利桑珠单抗的长期持续率较高,而依那西普和乌斯特库单抗的持续率却在下降,这表明治疗方面的考虑在不断变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and safety of sofpironium in treatment of primary hyperhidrosis: a systematic review. Efficacy and safety of 308-nm Excimer lamp combined with Tacrolimus 0.1% ointment vs Tacrolimus 0.1% ointment as monotherapy in treating children with limited vitiligo: a randomized controlled trial. The wide variety of methotrexate dosing regimens for the treatment of atopic dermatitis: a systematic review. Comparing Mohs micrographic surgery and wide local excision in the management of head and neck dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: a scoping review. The primary role of sebum in the pathophysiology of acne vulgaris and its therapeutic relevance in acne management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1