Utilizing Entropy of Cadence to Optimize Cycling Rehabilitation in Individuals With Parkinson's Disease.

Neurorehabilitation and neural repair Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1177/15459683241268556
Younguk Kim, Brittany E Smith, Lara M Shigo, Aasef G Shaikh, Kenneth A Loparo, Angela L Ridgel
{"title":"Utilizing Entropy of Cadence to Optimize Cycling Rehabilitation in Individuals With Parkinson's Disease.","authors":"Younguk Kim, Brittany E Smith, Lara M Shigo, Aasef G Shaikh, Kenneth A Loparo, Angela L Ridgel","doi":"10.1177/15459683241268556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies have established that increased Sample Entropy (SampEn) of cadence, a measure of non-linear variability, during dynamic cycling leads to greater improvements in motor function for individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD). However, there is significant variability in responses among individuals with PD due to symptoms and disease progression.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to develop and test a paradigm for adapting a cycling exercise intervention using SampEn of cadence and rider effort to improve motor function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-two participants were randomized into either patient-specific adaptive dynamic cycling (PSADC) or non-adaptive (NA) group. SampEn of cadence was calculated after each of the 12 sessions, and motor function was evaluated using the Kinesia test. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to analyze the relationship between SampEn of cadence and motor function improvement. Multiple linear regression (MLR) was used to identify the strongest predictors of motor function improvement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pearson's correlation coefficient revealed a significant correlation between SampEn of cadence and motor function improvements (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = -.545, <i>P</i> = .009), suggesting that higher SampEn of cadence led to greater motor function improvement. MLR demonstrated that SampEn of cadence was the strongest predictor of motor function improvement (β = -8.923, <i>t</i> = -2.632, <i>P</i> = .018) over the BMI, Levodopa equivalent daily dose, and effort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings show that PSADC paradigm promoted a greater improvement in motor function than NA dynamic cycling. These data will be used to develop a predictive model to optimize motor function improvement after cycling in individuals with PD.</p>","PeriodicalId":94158,"journal":{"name":"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair","volume":" ","pages":"693-704"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683241268556","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Previous studies have established that increased Sample Entropy (SampEn) of cadence, a measure of non-linear variability, during dynamic cycling leads to greater improvements in motor function for individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD). However, there is significant variability in responses among individuals with PD due to symptoms and disease progression.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to develop and test a paradigm for adapting a cycling exercise intervention using SampEn of cadence and rider effort to improve motor function.

Methods: Twenty-two participants were randomized into either patient-specific adaptive dynamic cycling (PSADC) or non-adaptive (NA) group. SampEn of cadence was calculated after each of the 12 sessions, and motor function was evaluated using the Kinesia test. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to analyze the relationship between SampEn of cadence and motor function improvement. Multiple linear regression (MLR) was used to identify the strongest predictors of motor function improvement.

Results: Pearson's correlation coefficient revealed a significant correlation between SampEn of cadence and motor function improvements (R2 = -.545, P = .009), suggesting that higher SampEn of cadence led to greater motor function improvement. MLR demonstrated that SampEn of cadence was the strongest predictor of motor function improvement (β = -8.923, t = -2.632, P = .018) over the BMI, Levodopa equivalent daily dose, and effort.

Conclusions: The findings show that PSADC paradigm promoted a greater improvement in motor function than NA dynamic cycling. These data will be used to develop a predictive model to optimize motor function improvement after cycling in individuals with PD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用步速熵优化帕金森病患者的自行车康复训练
背景:先前的研究已经证实,在动态骑行过程中,增加步频的样本熵(SampEn)(一种非线性变异性的测量方法)可显著改善帕金森病(PD)患者的运动功能。然而,帕金森病患者的反应因症状和疾病进展而存在很大差异:本研究的目的是开发并测试一种范例,利用步频和骑手努力程度的 SampEn 来调整自行车运动干预,从而改善运动功能:22名参与者被随机分为患者特定适应性动态骑行(PSADC)组或非适应性(NA)组。在 12 次训练中的每次训练后计算步频的 SampEn,并使用运动测试评估运动功能。皮尔逊相关系数用于分析步频 SampEn 与运动功能改善之间的关系。多元线性回归(MLR)用于确定运动功能改善的最强预测因子:皮尔逊相关系数显示,步频 SampEn 与运动功能改善之间存在显著相关性(R2 = -.545, P = .009),表明步频 SampEn 越高,运动功能改善越大。MLR表明,与体重指数、左旋多巴等效日剂量和努力程度相比,步频SampEn是运动功能改善的最强预测因子(β = -8.923,t = -2.632,P = .018):结论:研究结果表明,PSADC 范式比 NA 动感单车更能促进运动功能的改善。这些数据将用于开发一个预测模型,以优化帕金森病患者骑车后运动功能的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reinforcement Learning is Impaired in the Sub-acute Post-stroke Period. Post-Stroke Recovery in Relation to Parvalbumin-Positive Interneurons and Perineuronal Nets. Mapping Trajectories of Gait Recovery in Clinical Stroke Rehabilitation. Exploring Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Effects on Physical Outcomes in People With Parkinson's Disease: An Umbrella Evidence Mapping Review With Meta-analyses. Acute and Longitudinal Effects of Concussion on Reactive Balance in Collegiate Athletes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1