Papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: Does management differ based on facility variables?

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY American Journal of Otolaryngology Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104460
{"title":"Papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: Does management differ based on facility variables?","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Papillary thyroid carcinoma detection has increased dramatically in the United States. However, the indolent nature of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (mPTC) has led the American Thyroid Association (ATA) to advocate for more conservative management. The 2015 ATA recommendations advocated for observation or lobectomy for mPTC. However, the majority of mPTCs continue to be treated with more aggressive surgical management. In this study, we aim to understand the management of mPTC based on facility variables.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>A retrospective observational study of patients diagnosed with mPTC between 2004 and 2018 was performed using the National Cancer Database incidence data. We collected data on patient sex, age, tumor size, race, ethnicity, geographic location, thyroid surgical volume at the facility, and treatment modality for mPTC were collected. Conservative and non-conservative treatment modalities based on patient and facility characteristics were compared both longitudinally and cross-sectionally between pre- and post-2015 ATA recommendations.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Total thyroidectomy with or without radioactive iodine ablation (RAI) remains the treatment of choice regardless of patient and facility characteristics. Patients treated at low-volume facilities were actually more likely to be treated conservatively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Despite 2015 ATA recommendations advocating for observation or lobectomy for mPTC, patients with mPTC are still more likely to be treated with total thyroidectomy with or without RAI, especially at high-volume facilities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7591,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196070924002461","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Papillary thyroid carcinoma detection has increased dramatically in the United States. However, the indolent nature of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (mPTC) has led the American Thyroid Association (ATA) to advocate for more conservative management. The 2015 ATA recommendations advocated for observation or lobectomy for mPTC. However, the majority of mPTCs continue to be treated with more aggressive surgical management. In this study, we aim to understand the management of mPTC based on facility variables.

Materials and methods

A retrospective observational study of patients diagnosed with mPTC between 2004 and 2018 was performed using the National Cancer Database incidence data. We collected data on patient sex, age, tumor size, race, ethnicity, geographic location, thyroid surgical volume at the facility, and treatment modality for mPTC were collected. Conservative and non-conservative treatment modalities based on patient and facility characteristics were compared both longitudinally and cross-sectionally between pre- and post-2015 ATA recommendations.

Results

Total thyroidectomy with or without radioactive iodine ablation (RAI) remains the treatment of choice regardless of patient and facility characteristics. Patients treated at low-volume facilities were actually more likely to be treated conservatively.

Conclusions

Despite 2015 ATA recommendations advocating for observation or lobectomy for mPTC, patients with mPTC are still more likely to be treated with total thyroidectomy with or without RAI, especially at high-volume facilities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
甲状腺乳头状微癌:管理是否因设备变量而异?
目的:在美国,甲状腺乳头状癌的检出率急剧上升。然而,甲状腺乳头状微小癌(mPTC)的隐匿性使美国甲状腺协会(ATA)主张采取更为保守的治疗方法。2015 年 ATA 建议对 mPTC 采取观察或切除术。然而,大多数 mPTC 仍在接受更积极的手术治疗。在本研究中,我们旨在了解基于设施变量的 mPTC 治疗方法:我们利用国家癌症数据库的发病率数据,对 2004 年至 2018 年间确诊为 mPTC 的患者进行了一项回顾性观察研究。我们收集了患者性别、年龄、肿瘤大小、种族、民族、地理位置、医疗机构甲状腺手术量以及mPTC治疗方式等数据。根据患者和医疗机构的特征,对2015年ATA建议之前和之后的保守和非保守治疗方式进行了纵向和横向比较:无论患者和医疗机构的特征如何,甲状腺全切除术联合或不联合放射性碘消融术(RAI)仍是首选治疗方法。在低容量机构接受治疗的患者实际上更倾向于保守治疗:尽管2015年ATA建议对mPTC进行观察或切除甲状腺叶,但mPTC患者仍更倾向于接受全甲状腺切除术联合或不联合RAI治疗,尤其是在高容量医疗机构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Otolaryngology
American Journal of Otolaryngology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
378
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Be fully informed about developments in otology, neurotology, audiology, rhinology, allergy, laryngology, speech science, bronchoesophagology, facial plastic surgery, and head and neck surgery. Featured sections include original contributions, grand rounds, current reviews, case reports and socioeconomics.
期刊最新文献
Neurogenic cough: A commentary on the step-up approach and therapeutic considerations A national survey of otolaryngologists' perspectives on uses and barriers to palliative care. Transoral non-robotic surgery for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma Improving readability and comprehension levels of otolaryngology patient education materials using ChatGPT Analysis of head and eye dynamic may explain saccades in dizzy patients with normal VOR gain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1