Introduction to the Contemporary Assessment and Recommendations to Enhance Surgical Education and Training: Reports of the Subcommittees of the Blue Ribbon Committee II.
E Christopher Ellison, Steven C Satin, Keith D Lillemoe
{"title":"Introduction to the Contemporary Assessment and Recommendations to Enhance Surgical Education and Training: Reports of the Subcommittees of the Blue Ribbon Committee II.","authors":"E Christopher Ellison, Steven C Satin, Keith D Lillemoe","doi":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The BRC II was a panel of 67 experts selected on the basis of experience and leadership in surgical education and training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>It was organized into subcommittees, each of which was asked to prepare a manuscript on their findings and recommendations. The BRC II Subcommittees were: Blue Ribbon Committee 1 Review and Assessment; Surgical Workforce; Medical Student Education; Work Life Integration; Resident Education; Goals, Structure and Financing of Training; Education Support and Faculty Development; Research Training; Educational Technology and Assessment. BRC II used the Delphi approach with consensus defined as equal to or greater than 80% and identified and recommended 31 priorities for surgical education in 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial findings were presented to a general surgery and related specialty resident and fellow focus group for comments and written feedback, and they were asked to prepare a manuscript as well.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The reports of the Subcommittees of the BRC II provide an assessment and key recommendations concerning surgical education and training in 2024.</p>","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006495","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The BRC II was a panel of 67 experts selected on the basis of experience and leadership in surgical education and training.
Methods: It was organized into subcommittees, each of which was asked to prepare a manuscript on their findings and recommendations. The BRC II Subcommittees were: Blue Ribbon Committee 1 Review and Assessment; Surgical Workforce; Medical Student Education; Work Life Integration; Resident Education; Goals, Structure and Financing of Training; Education Support and Faculty Development; Research Training; Educational Technology and Assessment. BRC II used the Delphi approach with consensus defined as equal to or greater than 80% and identified and recommended 31 priorities for surgical education in 2024.
Results: The initial findings were presented to a general surgery and related specialty resident and fellow focus group for comments and written feedback, and they were asked to prepare a manuscript as well.
Conclusions: The reports of the Subcommittees of the BRC II provide an assessment and key recommendations concerning surgical education and training in 2024.
背景:BRC II 是一个由 67 名专家组成的小组,这些专家是根据他们在外科教育和培训方面的经验和领导能力挑选出来的:方法:该委员会分为多个小组委员会,每个小组委员会都被要求就其研究结果和建议编写一份手稿。BRC II 小组委员会包括蓝带委员会 1 审查和评估;外科劳动力;医学生教育;工作与生活的结合;住院医师教育;培训的目标、结构和经费;教育支持和教师发展;研究培训;教育技术和评估。BRC II 采用德尔菲法,共识定义为等于或大于 80%,确定并建议了 2024 年外科教育的 31 个优先事项:初步研究结果已提交给普外科及相关专科住院医师和研究员焦点小组,以征求意见和书面反馈,并要求他们准备一份手稿:BRC II 小组委员会的报告提供了有关 2024 年外科教育和培训的评估和主要建议。
期刊介绍:
The Annals of Surgery is a renowned surgery journal, recognized globally for its extensive scholarly references. It serves as a valuable resource for the international medical community by disseminating knowledge regarding important developments in surgical science and practice. Surgeons regularly turn to the Annals of Surgery to stay updated on innovative practices and techniques. The journal also offers special editorial features such as "Advances in Surgical Technique," offering timely coverage of ongoing clinical issues. Additionally, the journal publishes monthly review articles that address the latest concerns in surgical practice.