Transcriptome comparisons of trophoblasts from regenerative cell models with peri-implantation human embryos†.

IF 3.1 2区 生物学 Q2 REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY Biology of Reproduction Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI:10.1093/biolre/ioae120
Deirdre M Logsdon, Hao Ming, Toshihiko Ezashi, Rachel C West, William B Schoolcraft, R Michael Roberts, Zongliang Jiang, Ye Yuan
{"title":"Transcriptome comparisons of trophoblasts from regenerative cell models with peri-implantation human embryos†.","authors":"Deirdre M Logsdon, Hao Ming, Toshihiko Ezashi, Rachel C West, William B Schoolcraft, R Michael Roberts, Zongliang Jiang, Ye Yuan","doi":"10.1093/biolre/ioae120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mechanisms controlling trophoblast (TB) proliferation and differentiation during embryo implantation are poorly understood. Human trophoblast stem cells (TSC) and BMP4/A83-01/PD173074-treated pluripotent stem cell-derived trophoblast cells (BAP) are two widely employed, contemporary models to study TB development and function, but how faithfully they mimic early TB cells has not been fully examined. We evaluated the transcriptomes of TB cells from BAP and TSC and directly compared them with those from peri-implantation human embryos during extended embryo culture (EEC) between embryonic days 8 to 12. The BAP and TSC grouped closely with TB cells from EEC within each TB sublineage following dimensional analysis and unsupervised hierarchical clustering. However, subtle differences in transcriptional programs existed within each TB sublineage. We also validated the presence of six genes in peri-implantation human embryos by immunolocalization. Our analysis reveals that both BAP and TSC models have features of peri-implantation TB s, while maintaining minor transcriptomic differences, and thus serve as valuable tools for studying implantation in lieu of human embryos.</p>","PeriodicalId":8965,"journal":{"name":"Biology of Reproduction","volume":" ","pages":"1000-1016"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology of Reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/biolre/ioae120","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mechanisms controlling trophoblast (TB) proliferation and differentiation during embryo implantation are poorly understood. Human trophoblast stem cells (TSC) and BMP4/A83-01/PD173074-treated pluripotent stem cell-derived trophoblast cells (BAP) are two widely employed, contemporary models to study TB development and function, but how faithfully they mimic early TB cells has not been fully examined. We evaluated the transcriptomes of TB cells from BAP and TSC and directly compared them with those from peri-implantation human embryos during extended embryo culture (EEC) between embryonic days 8 to 12. The BAP and TSC grouped closely with TB cells from EEC within each TB sublineage following dimensional analysis and unsupervised hierarchical clustering. However, subtle differences in transcriptional programs existed within each TB sublineage. We also validated the presence of six genes in peri-implantation human embryos by immunolocalization. Our analysis reveals that both BAP and TSC models have features of peri-implantation TB s, while maintaining minor transcriptomic differences, and thus serve as valuable tools for studying implantation in lieu of human embryos.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
来自再生细胞模型的滋养细胞与植入前人类胚胎的转录组比较。
人们对胚胎植入过程中滋养细胞增殖和分化的控制机制知之甚少。人类滋养层干细胞(TSC)和BMP4/A83-01/PD173074处理的多能干细胞衍生滋养层细胞(BAP)是研究滋养层发育和功能的两种广泛使用的现代模型,但它们如何忠实地模拟早期滋养层细胞尚未得到充分研究。我们评估了 BAP 和 TSC 滋养层细胞的转录组,并将它们与胚胎第 8 天至第 12 天期间进行扩展胚胎培养(EEC)的人类胚胎植入前的转录组进行了直接比较。通过维度分析和无监督分层聚类,BAP 和 TSC 与 EEC 中的滋养层细胞在各滋养层亚系中紧密分组。然而,每个滋养层细胞亚系内的转录程序存在细微差别。我们还通过免疫定位验证了六个基因存在于人类胚胎着床周围。我们的分析表明,BAP 和 TSC 模型都具有着床周围滋养细胞的特征,同时又保持着微小的转录组差异,因此可作为研究着床的重要工具,代替人类胚胎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biology of Reproduction
Biology of Reproduction 生物-生殖生物学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
214
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Biology of Reproduction (BOR) is the official journal of the Society for the Study of Reproduction and publishes original research on a broad range of topics in the field of reproductive biology, as well as reviews on topics of current importance or controversy. BOR is consistently one of the most highly cited journals publishing original research in the field of reproductive biology.
期刊最新文献
SCGB1D4 Downregulation Links to Fibrosis in Intrauterine Adhesion Patients and Rat Models. Pyrroloquinoline-quinone supplementation restores ovarian function and oocyte quality in a mouse model of advanced maternal age. Attenuation of Ampullary Anoctamin 1 by the Peritoneal Fluid in Rhesus Macaques with Spontaneous Endometriosis. CSPG4 involvement in endometrial decidualization contributes to the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. CTNND1 affects trophoblast proliferation and specification during human embryo implantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1