Validation of the RIETE, Kuijer, and HAS-BLED Models to Assess 3-Month Bleeding Risk in Anticoagulated Patients Diagnosed with Venous Thromboembolic Disease.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/10760296241271351
Stephanie Ortiz Gómez, Paula Ruiz-Talero, Oscar Muñoz, Luis Manuel Hoyos Pumarejo
{"title":"Validation of the RIETE, Kuijer, and HAS-BLED Models to Assess 3-Month Bleeding Risk in Anticoagulated Patients Diagnosed with Venous Thromboembolic Disease.","authors":"Stephanie Ortiz Gómez, Paula Ruiz-Talero, Oscar Muñoz, Luis Manuel Hoyos Pumarejo","doi":"10.1177/10760296241271351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the discriminative ability and calibration of the RIETE, Kuijer, and HAS-BLED models for predicting 3-month bleeding risk in patients anticoagulated for venous thromboembolism (VTE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>External validation study of a prediction model based on a retrospective cohort of patients with VTE seen at the Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá (Colombia) between July 2021 and June 2023. The calibration of the scales was evaluated using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test and the ratio of observed to expected events (ROE) within each risk category. Discriminatory ability was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC) of a ROC curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 470 patients (median age 65 years, female sex 59.3%) with a diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis in most cases (57.4%), 5.7% bleeding events were observed. Regarding calibration, adequate calibration cannot be ruled out given the limited number of events. The discriminatory ability was limited with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.48 (CI 0.37-0.59) for Kuijer Score, 0.58 (CI 0.47-0.70) for HAS-BLED and 0.64 (CI 0.51-0.76) for RIETE.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Kuijer, HAS-BLED, and RIETE models in patients with VTE generally do not adequately estimate the risk of bleeding at three months, with a low ability to discriminate high-risk patients. Cautious interpretation is recommended until further evidence is available.</p>","PeriodicalId":10335,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis","volume":"30 ","pages":"10760296241271351"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11307365/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10760296241271351","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the discriminative ability and calibration of the RIETE, Kuijer, and HAS-BLED models for predicting 3-month bleeding risk in patients anticoagulated for venous thromboembolism (VTE).

Methods: External validation study of a prediction model based on a retrospective cohort of patients with VTE seen at the Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá (Colombia) between July 2021 and June 2023. The calibration of the scales was evaluated using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test and the ratio of observed to expected events (ROE) within each risk category. Discriminatory ability was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC) of a ROC curve.

Results: We analyzed 470 patients (median age 65 years, female sex 59.3%) with a diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis in most cases (57.4%), 5.7% bleeding events were observed. Regarding calibration, adequate calibration cannot be ruled out given the limited number of events. The discriminatory ability was limited with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.48 (CI 0.37-0.59) for Kuijer Score, 0.58 (CI 0.47-0.70) for HAS-BLED and 0.64 (CI 0.51-0.76) for RIETE.

Conclusion: The Kuijer, HAS-BLED, and RIETE models in patients with VTE generally do not adequately estimate the risk of bleeding at three months, with a low ability to discriminate high-risk patients. Cautious interpretation is recommended until further evidence is available.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对 RIETE、Kuijer 和 HAS-BLED 模型进行验证,以评估确诊为静脉血栓栓塞性疾病的抗凝患者 3 个月的出血风险。
目的评估 RIETE、Kuijer 和 HAS-BLED 模型预测静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)抗凝患者 3 个月出血风险的判别能力和校准:基于 2021 年 7 月至 2023 年 6 月期间在哥伦比亚波哥大圣伊格纳西奥大学医院就诊的 VTE 患者的回顾性队列,对预测模型进行外部验证研究。使用 Hosmer-Lemeshow 检验和每个风险类别中观察到的事件与预期事件的比率 (ROE) 评估了量表的校准。使用 ROC 曲线的曲线下面积 (AUC) 评估判别能力:我们对 470 名患者(中位年龄 65 岁,女性占 59.3%)进行了分析,其中大多数病例(57.4%)诊断为深静脉血栓,5.7% 观察到出血事件。在校准方面,由于事件数量有限,不能排除校准充分的可能性。判别能力有限,Kuijer评分的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.48(CI 0.37-0.59),HAS-BLED为0.58(CI 0.47-0.70),RIETE为0.64(CI 0.51-0.76):VTE患者的Kuijer、HAS-BLED和RIETE模型通常不能充分估计三个月后的出血风险,区分高危患者的能力较低。在获得更多证据之前,建议谨慎解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
150
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: CATH is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal that addresses the practical clinical and laboratory issues involved in managing bleeding and clotting disorders, especially those related to thrombosis, hemostasis, and vascular disorders. CATH covers clinical trials, studies on etiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of thrombohemorrhagic disorders.
期刊最新文献
Correlation Between Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio with Risk Stratification Indicators and Thrombus Burden in Patients with Moderate-to-High Risk Acute Pulmonary Embolism, and Changes After Treatment Advanced Machine Learning Models for Predicting Post-Thrombolysis Hemorrhagic Transformation in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Three-Year Outcomes, Risk Factors for Restenosis After Stenting for DVT Combined with Iliac Vein Compression Syndrome Thanks to Reviewers Anti-Xa Monitoring of Apixaban (ZyQuis) in Venous Thrombo-Embolism and Atrial Fibrillation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1