Hysterectomy with sentinel lymph node dissection in the setting of preoperative endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia and an endometrial stripe ≥20 mm: a cost-effectiveness analysis .

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY International Journal of Gynecological Cancer Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI:10.1136/ijgc-2024-005658
Sarah Bell, Kenneth Smith, Haeyon Kim, Taylor Orellana, Lakshmi Harinath, Shannon Rush, Alexander Olawaiye, Jamie Lesnock
{"title":"Hysterectomy with sentinel lymph node dissection in the setting of preoperative endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia and an endometrial stripe ≥20 mm: a cost-effectiveness analysis .","authors":"Sarah Bell, Kenneth Smith, Haeyon Kim, Taylor Orellana, Lakshmi Harinath, Shannon Rush, Alexander Olawaiye, Jamie Lesnock","doi":"10.1136/ijgc-2024-005658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Routine lymph node assessment in patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia is institution and surgeon-dependent without clear guidelines. We sought to determine if routine sentinel lymph node (SLN) dissection at the time of laparoscopic hysterectomy for patients with a preoperative diagnosis of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia and a preoperative ultrasound with endometrial stripe ≥20 mm is cost-effective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A decision model was created to perform two cost-effectiveness analyses: (1) hysterectomy with frozen section versus hysterectomy with SLN dissection in patients with a preoperative diagnosis of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia and an endometrial stripe of 20 mm or greater, and (2) the same options in all patients with a preoperative diagnosis of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia. Costs obtained from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and event probabilities and quality of life utility values were obtained through literature review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the case of preoperative endometrial stripe ≥20 mm, hysterectomy with SLN dissection cost $2469 more than hysterectomy with frozen section and gained 0.010 quality adjusted life years, or $44,997/quality-adjusted life years gained. In one-way sensitivity analyses, SLN dissection remained the favored strategy at a willingness to pay threshold of $100,000/quality-adjusted life years unless chronic lower extremity lymphedema after full lymphadenectomy had a likelihood <13.1% (base case value 18.1%); otherwise, SLN dissection was favored with individual variation of all other parameters over plausible ranges. When considering all patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia, hysterectomy with frozen section was favored, with results most sensitive to variation of lymphedema risk after full lymphadenectomy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hysterectomy with SLN dissection in patients with a preoperative endometrial stripe ≥20mm on ultrasound is cost-effective when compared with hysterectomy with frozen section.</p>","PeriodicalId":14097,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","volume":" ","pages":"1898-1905"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2024-005658","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Routine lymph node assessment in patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia is institution and surgeon-dependent without clear guidelines. We sought to determine if routine sentinel lymph node (SLN) dissection at the time of laparoscopic hysterectomy for patients with a preoperative diagnosis of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia and a preoperative ultrasound with endometrial stripe ≥20 mm is cost-effective.

Methods: A decision model was created to perform two cost-effectiveness analyses: (1) hysterectomy with frozen section versus hysterectomy with SLN dissection in patients with a preoperative diagnosis of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia and an endometrial stripe of 20 mm or greater, and (2) the same options in all patients with a preoperative diagnosis of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia. Costs obtained from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and event probabilities and quality of life utility values were obtained through literature review.

Results: In the case of preoperative endometrial stripe ≥20 mm, hysterectomy with SLN dissection cost $2469 more than hysterectomy with frozen section and gained 0.010 quality adjusted life years, or $44,997/quality-adjusted life years gained. In one-way sensitivity analyses, SLN dissection remained the favored strategy at a willingness to pay threshold of $100,000/quality-adjusted life years unless chronic lower extremity lymphedema after full lymphadenectomy had a likelihood <13.1% (base case value 18.1%); otherwise, SLN dissection was favored with individual variation of all other parameters over plausible ranges. When considering all patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia, hysterectomy with frozen section was favored, with results most sensitive to variation of lymphedema risk after full lymphadenectomy.

Conclusion: Hysterectomy with SLN dissection in patients with a preoperative endometrial stripe ≥20mm on ultrasound is cost-effective when compared with hysterectomy with frozen section.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在术前子宫内膜上皮内瘤变和子宫内膜条纹≥20 毫米的情况下进行子宫切除术和前哨淋巴结清扫:成本效益分析 .
目的:子宫内膜上皮内瘤变患者的常规淋巴结评估取决于机构和外科医生,没有明确的指导原则。我们试图确定,对于术前诊断为子宫内膜上皮内瘤变、术前超声检查子宫内膜条纹≥20 毫米的患者,在进行腹腔镜子宫切除术时进行常规前哨淋巴结(SLN)清扫是否具有成本效益:建立了一个决策模型来进行两项成本效益分析:(1)对术前诊断为子宫内膜上皮内瘤变且子宫内膜条纹大于或等于20毫米的患者进行子宫切除加冰冻切片与子宫切除加SLN剥离;(2)对所有术前诊断为子宫内膜上皮内瘤变的患者进行相同的选择。费用来自美国医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心,事件概率和生活质量效用值则通过文献查阅获得:结果:在术前子宫内膜条纹≥20 mm的情况下,子宫切除术加SLN切除术比子宫切除术加冰冻切片的费用高出2469美元,而获得的质量调整生命年为0.010年,即44997美元/质量调整生命年。在单向敏感性分析中,除非全淋巴结切除术后出现慢性下肢淋巴水肿的可能性较大,否则在 100,000 美元/质量调整生命年的支付意愿阈值下,SLN 切除术仍是首选策略:与冷冻切片子宫切除术相比,对术前超声检查子宫内膜条纹≥20 毫米的患者进行子宫切除术并行 SLN 切除术具有成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
280
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, the official journal of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, is the primary educational and informational publication for topics relevant to detection, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of gynecologic malignancies. IJGC emphasizes a multidisciplinary approach, and includes original research, reviews, and video articles. The audience consists of gynecologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, pathologists, and research scientists with a special interest in gynecological oncology.
期刊最新文献
Optimizing patient selection for secondary cytoreductive surgery in recurrent endometrial cancer. Comparison of overall and patterns of care in patients with a malignant ovarian germ cell tumor by age in the United States: a National Cancer Database (2004-2016) analysis. Laparoscopic transperitoneal resection of bulky aortocaval and infrarenal metastatic lymph nodes in a patient with locally advanced cervical carcinoma. Hysterectomy with sentinel lymph node dissection in the setting of preoperative endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia and an endometrial stripe ≥20 mm: a cost-effectiveness analysis . Liver mobilization and sub-diaphragmatic peritonectomy by laparoscopy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1