A Pilot Study of Ultrasound Assessment of Umbilical Cord and Placental Vascular Flow for Cord Accident Stillbirth Prevention

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 ACOUSTICS Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-07 DOI:10.1002/jum.16546
Nathan R. Blue MD, MSCI, Amanda A. Allshouse MS, Kimberly A. Moyle MD, MSCI, Keisha Dimick RDMS, Robert M. Silver MD
{"title":"A Pilot Study of Ultrasound Assessment of Umbilical Cord and Placental Vascular Flow for Cord Accident Stillbirth Prevention","authors":"Nathan R. Blue MD, MSCI,&nbsp;Amanda A. Allshouse MS,&nbsp;Kimberly A. Moyle MD, MSCI,&nbsp;Keisha Dimick RDMS,&nbsp;Robert M. Silver MD","doi":"10.1002/jum.16546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Our objective was to determine the feasibility and interobserver reliability of umbilical cord and placental arteriolar flow assessment in low-risk pregnancies near term.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This was a prospective pilot study in low-risk pregnancies at 36 weeks with anterior placentas. We excluded any with an indication for antenatal testing or delivery before 39 weeks. Each participant underwent two ultrasounds by different examiners, which included arterial and venous velocimetry at three cord sites (fetal, free loop, and placental) in addition to maternal and fetal placental arterioles. The interobserver reliability was quantified using the Pearson correlation coefficient with that of standard clinical parameters serving as a benchmark for interpretation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among 53 participants scanned at 35<sup>6/7</sup>–37<sup>1/7</sup> weeks, the mean examination duration was 20.5 ± 4.2 minutes. Ascertainment success was high for measures at the free loop, placental cord insertion, and fetal placental arterioles (range 90.6%–99.1%) and was lower at the fetal cord insertion and maternal spiral arterioles (range 47.2%–87.7%). Interobserver reliability estimates for free-loop systolic/diastolic and pulsatility index ranged from 0.38 to 0.44. Interobserver reliability for experimental parameters varied by measurement site, and all were poor at the fetal insertion and in placental arterioles. Parameters had significant variation across cord sites (range 4.3%–21.7%).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>In our cohort, flow assessments of the free loop, placental insertion, and placental arterioles are feasible, but interrater reliability varies by measurement type and cord site. Future studies are needed to establish feasibility and reliability in nonanterior placentation and to assess clinical relevance.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":"43 11","pages":"2153-2162"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jum.16546","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jum.16546","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Our objective was to determine the feasibility and interobserver reliability of umbilical cord and placental arteriolar flow assessment in low-risk pregnancies near term.

Methods

This was a prospective pilot study in low-risk pregnancies at 36 weeks with anterior placentas. We excluded any with an indication for antenatal testing or delivery before 39 weeks. Each participant underwent two ultrasounds by different examiners, which included arterial and venous velocimetry at three cord sites (fetal, free loop, and placental) in addition to maternal and fetal placental arterioles. The interobserver reliability was quantified using the Pearson correlation coefficient with that of standard clinical parameters serving as a benchmark for interpretation.

Results

Among 53 participants scanned at 356/7–371/7 weeks, the mean examination duration was 20.5 ± 4.2 minutes. Ascertainment success was high for measures at the free loop, placental cord insertion, and fetal placental arterioles (range 90.6%–99.1%) and was lower at the fetal cord insertion and maternal spiral arterioles (range 47.2%–87.7%). Interobserver reliability estimates for free-loop systolic/diastolic and pulsatility index ranged from 0.38 to 0.44. Interobserver reliability for experimental parameters varied by measurement site, and all were poor at the fetal insertion and in placental arterioles. Parameters had significant variation across cord sites (range 4.3%–21.7%).

Conclusion

In our cohort, flow assessments of the free loop, placental insertion, and placental arterioles are feasible, but interrater reliability varies by measurement type and cord site. Future studies are needed to establish feasibility and reliability in nonanterior placentation and to assess clinical relevance.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声评估脐带和胎盘血管流量以预防脐带意外死胎的试点研究
目的我们的目的是确定对临近足月的低危妊娠进行脐带和胎盘动脉血流评估的可行性和观察者间的可靠性:这是一项前瞻性试验研究,对象是妊娠 36 周、前置胎盘的低危妊娠。我们排除了有产前检查指征或在 39 周前分娩的孕妇。每位受试者由不同的检查人员进行两次超声检查,包括三个脐带部位(胎儿、游离环和胎盘)的动脉和静脉测速,以及母体和胎儿的胎盘动脉血管测速。使用皮尔逊相关系数对观察者之间的可靠性进行量化,并将标准临床参数作为解释的基准:结果:53 名参与者在 356/7-371/7 周时进行了扫描,平均检查时间为 20.5 ± 4.2 分钟。游离环、胎盘脐带插入和胎儿胎盘动脉血管测量的确定成功率较高(范围为 90.6%-99.1%),而胎儿脐带插入和母体螺旋动脉血管的确定成功率较低(范围为 47.2%-87.7%)。自由环收缩/舒张和搏动指数的观察者间可靠性估计值在 0.38 至 0.44 之间。实验参数的观察者间可靠性因测量部位而异,胎儿插入部位和胎盘动脉血管的观察者间可靠性均较差。不同脐带部位的参数差异很大(范围为 4.3%-21.7%):结论:在我们的队列中,对游离环、胎盘插入部和胎盘动脉血管进行血流评估是可行的,但测量类型和脐带部位不同,测量者之间的可靠性也不同。未来的研究需要确定非前置胎盘的可行性和可靠性,并评估临床相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
205
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine (JUM) is dedicated to the rapid, accurate publication of original articles dealing with all aspects of medical ultrasound, particularly its direct application to patient care but also relevant basic science, advances in instrumentation, and biological effects. The journal is an official publication of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and publishes articles in a variety of categories, including Original Research papers, Review Articles, Pictorial Essays, Technical Innovations, Case Series, Letters to the Editor, and more, from an international bevy of countries in a continual effort to showcase and promote advances in the ultrasound community. Represented through these efforts are a wide variety of disciplines of ultrasound, including, but not limited to: -Basic Science- Breast Ultrasound- Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound- Dermatology- Echocardiography- Elastography- Emergency Medicine- Fetal Echocardiography- Gastrointestinal Ultrasound- General and Abdominal Ultrasound- Genitourinary Ultrasound- Gynecologic Ultrasound- Head and Neck Ultrasound- High Frequency Clinical and Preclinical Imaging- Interventional-Intraoperative Ultrasound- Musculoskeletal Ultrasound- Neurosonology- Obstetric Ultrasound- Ophthalmologic Ultrasound- Pediatric Ultrasound- Point-of-Care Ultrasound- Public Policy- Superficial Structures- Therapeutic Ultrasound- Ultrasound Education- Ultrasound in Global Health- Urologic Ultrasound- Vascular Ultrasound
期刊最新文献
The Median Nerve Displays Adaptive Characteristics When Exposed to Repeated Pinch Grip Efforts of Varying Rates of Force Development: An Ultrasonic Investigation. Ultrasound Pattern of Congenital Smooth Muscle Hamartoma of the Skin. Ultrasonographic Features of the Fallopian Tubes: An Overview on Main Tubal Pathologies. Clinical and Multimodal Imaging Features of Hepatic Inflammatory Pseudotumors: A Two-Center Retrospective Study. Sonographic Characterization of Red-Blue Neurofibromas in Patients With Neurofibromatosis Type 1: An Observational Prospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1