Effect of patient characteristics on aortic attenuation in iodinated contrast-enhanced Abdominopelvic CT: A retrospective study

IF 2.5 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Radiography Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.radi.2024.07.012
{"title":"Effect of patient characteristics on aortic attenuation in iodinated contrast-enhanced Abdominopelvic CT: A retrospective study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.radi.2024.07.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Contrast Enhanced Computed Tomography (CECT) abdomen and pelvis is a common imaging procedure. Hospitals typically follow fixed protocols of contrast volume administration for triple-phase CECT abdomen and pelvis scans and have found that patients are either underdosed or overdosed with respect to their body habitus. The aim of the study was to correlate different patient characteristics such as Total body weight (TBW), Lean Body Mass (LBM), Body Mass Index (BMI), Body Surface Area (BSA) and Blood Volume (BV) with aortic enhancement in the arterial and portal venous phases for CECT Abdomen and pelvis.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 106 patients who underwent triple-phase CECT abdomen &amp; pelvis were retrospectively studied. A circular region-of-interest (ROI) of 100 mm<sup>2</sup> was positioned on descending aorta for unenhanced, arterial, and portal venous phases to measure the aortic enhancement in Hounsfield's units. Measure of contrast attenuation (ΔH) was calculated from the difference of CT values on unenhanced images and contrast images. Correlation analysis was performed to evaluate the relation of patient body characteristics with aortic enhancement.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Correlation analysis revealed that BMI exhibited the least correlation when compared to the other characteristics in both arterial (r = −0.3; p = 0.002) and portovenous phases (r = −0.35; p &lt; 0.001) whereas TBW, LBW, BSA and BV reported moderate inverse correlations. BV was found to be the strongest of all characteristics under linear regression.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The study supports the use of protocols that adjust contrast volume to either TBW, LBW, BSA, or BV for CT abdomen and pelvis scan.</p></div><div><h3>Implication of practice</h3><p>The right body parameter ensures optimal contrast enhancement, improving the visualization of anatomical structures and helps in adapting tailored contrast injection protocols.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47416,"journal":{"name":"Radiography","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S107881742400186X/pdfft?md5=7748c06ce5aef2dde1bd8b5555b199d3&pid=1-s2.0-S107881742400186X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S107881742400186X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Contrast Enhanced Computed Tomography (CECT) abdomen and pelvis is a common imaging procedure. Hospitals typically follow fixed protocols of contrast volume administration for triple-phase CECT abdomen and pelvis scans and have found that patients are either underdosed or overdosed with respect to their body habitus. The aim of the study was to correlate different patient characteristics such as Total body weight (TBW), Lean Body Mass (LBM), Body Mass Index (BMI), Body Surface Area (BSA) and Blood Volume (BV) with aortic enhancement in the arterial and portal venous phases for CECT Abdomen and pelvis.

Methods

A total of 106 patients who underwent triple-phase CECT abdomen & pelvis were retrospectively studied. A circular region-of-interest (ROI) of 100 mm2 was positioned on descending aorta for unenhanced, arterial, and portal venous phases to measure the aortic enhancement in Hounsfield's units. Measure of contrast attenuation (ΔH) was calculated from the difference of CT values on unenhanced images and contrast images. Correlation analysis was performed to evaluate the relation of patient body characteristics with aortic enhancement.

Results

Correlation analysis revealed that BMI exhibited the least correlation when compared to the other characteristics in both arterial (r = −0.3; p = 0.002) and portovenous phases (r = −0.35; p < 0.001) whereas TBW, LBW, BSA and BV reported moderate inverse correlations. BV was found to be the strongest of all characteristics under linear regression.

Conclusion

The study supports the use of protocols that adjust contrast volume to either TBW, LBW, BSA, or BV for CT abdomen and pelvis scan.

Implication of practice

The right body parameter ensures optimal contrast enhancement, improving the visualization of anatomical structures and helps in adapting tailored contrast injection protocols.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患者特征对碘化造影剂增强腹盆腔 CT 主动脉衰减的影响:一项回顾性研究。
简介对比剂增强计算机断层扫描(CECT)腹部和盆腔是一种常见的成像程序。医院在进行三相 CECT 腹部和骨盆扫描时,通常会按照固定的方案使用造影剂,并发现患者的体型会导致造影剂用量不足或过量。本研究的目的是将患者的不同特征,如总重量(TBW)、瘦体重(LBM)、体重指数(BMI)、体表面积(BSA)和血容量(BV)与 CECT 腹部和盆腔扫描中动脉和门静脉阶段的主动脉增强相关联:回顾性研究了106例接受腹部和盆腔三相CECT检查的患者。在降主动脉未增强期、动脉期和门静脉期定位一个 100 平方毫米的圆形感兴趣区(ROI),以 Hounsfield 单位测量主动脉增强情况。对比度衰减(ΔH)是根据未增强图像和对比度图像的 CT 值之差计算得出的。进行相关分析以评估患者身体特征与主动脉增强的关系:结果:相关性分析表明,在动脉期(r = -0.3;p = 0.002)和动静脉期(r = -0.35;p 结论:该研究支持在主动脉造影中使用 "主动脉增强 "方案:该研究支持在腹部和盆腔 CT 扫描中使用根据 TBW、LBW、BSA 或 BV 调整造影剂量的方案:实践意义:正确的身体参数可确保最佳的造影剂增强效果,改善解剖结构的可视化,并有助于调整量身定制的造影剂注射方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Radiography
Radiography RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
34.60%
发文量
169
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Radiography is an International, English language, peer-reviewed journal of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy. Radiography is the official professional journal of the College of Radiographers and is published quarterly. Radiography aims to publish the highest quality material, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy and oncology.
期刊最新文献
CT metal artefact reduction for hip and shoulder implants using novel algorithms and machine learning: A systematic review with pairwise and network meta-analyses Clinical insights into cross-sectional imaging integration in radiography education Paediatric diagnostic reference levels for common computed tomography procedures: A systematic review “Making it work in the face of extreme adversity” - Exploring perceptions for the future of the imaging and oncology workforce using ‘soundbite’ interviews Radiographer Education and Learning in Artificial Intelligence (REAL-AI): A survey of radiographers, radiologists, and students’ knowledge of and attitude to education on AI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1