Examining breast cancer screening recommendations in Canada: The projected resource impact of screening among women aged 40-49.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Medical Screening Pub Date : 2024-08-06 DOI:10.1177/09691413241267845
Robert B Basmadjian, Yibing Ruan, John M Hutchinson, Matthew T Warkentin, Oguzhan Alagoz, Andrew Coldman, Darren R Brenner
{"title":"Examining breast cancer screening recommendations in Canada: The projected resource impact of screening among women aged 40-49.","authors":"Robert B Basmadjian, Yibing Ruan, John M Hutchinson, Matthew T Warkentin, Oguzhan Alagoz, Andrew Coldman, Darren R Brenner","doi":"10.1177/09691413241267845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To quantify the resource use of revising breast cancer screening guidelines to include average-risk women aged 40-49 years across Canada from 2024 to 2043 using a validated microsimulation model.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>OncoSim-Breast microsimulation platform was used to simulate the entire Canadian population in 2015-2051.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared resource use between current screening guidelines (biennial screening ages 50-74) and alternate screening scenarios, which included annual and biennial screening for ages 40-49 and ages 45-49, followed by biennial screening ages 50-74. We estimated absolute and relative differences in number of screens, abnormal screening recalls without cancer, total and negative biopsies, screen-detected cancers, stage of diagnosis, and breast cancer deaths averted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with current guidelines in Canada, the most intensive screening scenario (annual screening ages 40-49) would result in 13.3% increases in the number of screens and abnormal screening recalls without cancer whereas the least intensive scenario (biennial screening ages 45-49) would result in a 3.4% increase in number of screens and 3.8% increase in number of abnormal screening recalls without cancer. More intensive screening would be associated with fewer stage II, III, and IV diagnoses, and more breast cancer deaths averted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Revising breast cancer screening in Canada to include average-risk women aged 40-49 would detect cancers earlier leading to fewer breast cancer deaths. To realize this potential clinical benefit, a considerable increase in screening resources would be required in terms of number of screens and screen follow-ups. Further economic analyses are required to fully understand cost and budget implications.</p>","PeriodicalId":51089,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Screening","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Screening","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09691413241267845","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To quantify the resource use of revising breast cancer screening guidelines to include average-risk women aged 40-49 years across Canada from 2024 to 2043 using a validated microsimulation model.

Setting: OncoSim-Breast microsimulation platform was used to simulate the entire Canadian population in 2015-2051.

Methods: We compared resource use between current screening guidelines (biennial screening ages 50-74) and alternate screening scenarios, which included annual and biennial screening for ages 40-49 and ages 45-49, followed by biennial screening ages 50-74. We estimated absolute and relative differences in number of screens, abnormal screening recalls without cancer, total and negative biopsies, screen-detected cancers, stage of diagnosis, and breast cancer deaths averted.

Results: Compared with current guidelines in Canada, the most intensive screening scenario (annual screening ages 40-49) would result in 13.3% increases in the number of screens and abnormal screening recalls without cancer whereas the least intensive scenario (biennial screening ages 45-49) would result in a 3.4% increase in number of screens and 3.8% increase in number of abnormal screening recalls without cancer. More intensive screening would be associated with fewer stage II, III, and IV diagnoses, and more breast cancer deaths averted.

Conclusions: Revising breast cancer screening in Canada to include average-risk women aged 40-49 would detect cancers earlier leading to fewer breast cancer deaths. To realize this potential clinical benefit, a considerable increase in screening resources would be required in terms of number of screens and screen follow-ups. Further economic analyses are required to fully understand cost and budget implications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究加拿大的乳腺癌筛查建议:在 40-49 岁妇女中进行筛查的预计资源影响。
目的利用经过验证的微观模拟模型,量化修订乳腺癌筛查指南以纳入 2024 年至 2043 年加拿大 40-49 岁平均风险女性的资源使用情况:设置:使用OncoSim-Breast微观模拟平台模拟2015-2051年整个加拿大人口:我们比较了现行筛查指南(50-74 岁每两年筛查一次)和其他筛查方案的资源使用情况,其中包括 40-49 岁和 45-49 岁每年和每两年筛查一次,然后 50-74 岁每两年筛查一次。我们估算了筛查次数、无癌症的筛查异常召回、活检总数和阴性活检、筛查出的癌症、诊断阶段和避免的乳腺癌死亡人数的绝对和相对差异:与加拿大现行指南相比,筛查强度最高的方案(40-49 岁每年筛查一次)将使筛查次数和无癌症的异常筛查回顾次数增加 13.3%,而筛查强度最低的方案(45-49 岁每两年筛查一次)将使筛查次数增加 3.4%,无癌症的异常筛查回顾次数增加 3.8%。更密集的筛查将减少 II、III 和 IV 期诊断,避免更多乳腺癌死亡:修改加拿大的乳腺癌筛查,将 40-49 岁的平均风险妇女纳入筛查范围,将更早地发现癌症,从而减少乳腺癌死亡人数。为了实现这一潜在的临床益处,需要在筛查次数和筛查随访方面大幅增加筛查资源。要充分了解成本和预算影响,还需要进行进一步的经济分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Screening
Journal of Medical Screening 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Screening, a fully peer reviewed journal, is concerned with all aspects of medical screening, particularly the publication of research that advances screening theory and practice. The journal aims to increase awareness of the principles of screening (quantitative and statistical aspects), screening techniques and procedures and methodologies from all specialties. An essential subscription for physicians, clinicians and academics with an interest in screening, epidemiology and public health.
期刊最新文献
Newborn screening for biliary atresia using direct bilirubin: An implementation science study. Improving access to cervical cancer screening: The impact of a Saturday pap smear clinic. Women's experience of the information provided along with invitation to participate in BreastScreen Norway. Anxiety and disease awareness in individuals with heredity for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Breast cancer mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1