Looking to "Level the Field": A Qualitative Study of How Clinicians Operationalize Social Determinants in Critical Care.

Deepa Ramadurai, Heta Patel, Jacqueline Chan, Juliet Young, Justin T Clapp, Joanna L Hart
{"title":"Looking to \"Level the Field\": A Qualitative Study of How Clinicians Operationalize Social Determinants in Critical Care.","authors":"Deepa Ramadurai, Heta Patel, Jacqueline Chan, Juliet Young, Justin T Clapp, Joanna L Hart","doi":"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202404-434OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Rationale:</b> Current critical care practice does not integrate social determinants of health (SDOH) in systematic or standardized ways. Routine assessment of SDOH in the intensive care unit (ICU) may improve clinical decision making, patient- and family-centered outcomes, and clinician well-being. <b>Objective:</b> Given that the appropriateness and feasibility of SDOH assessment in the ICU is unknown, we aimed to understand how ICU clinicians think about and use SDOH. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted semistructured interviews with clinicians focused on barriers to and facilitators of assessing SDOH during critical illness and perceptions of screening for SDOH in the ICU. We used chart-stimulated recall to assist clinicians in reflecting on how SDOH applied to and was used in patients' care. After deidentifying interviews, we analyzed transcripts guided by a thematic analysis approach using a combination of inductive and deductive coding, the latter framed within the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention SDOH Healthy People framework. <b>Results:</b> We completed interviews with 30 clinicians in a variety of professional roles. The majority of clinicians self-identified as men (<i>n</i> = 17; 56.7%) of White race (<i>n</i> = 25; 83.3%). Clinicians contextualize their use of SDOH within three frames of reference: <i>1</i>) their own identity and experiences; <i>2</i>) their relationships and communication with patients and caregivers; and <i>3</i>) immediate structures of care around ICU patients, including clinician advocacy, care transitions, and readmission. Clinicians identified that discussing SDOH could allow them to recognize bias faced by their patients, elucidate drivers of critical illness, and navigate communication with patients' caregivers. Clinicians worried about ICU-specific factors impeding the discussion of SDOH, including time constraints and acuity, high stakes and emotions, and negative anticipatory emotions. <b>Conclusions:</b> Clinicians gather SDOH during critical illness both to understand their patients' stories and to provide individualized care, which may lead to better clinician satisfaction and patient- and family-centered care outcomes. Educational and operational efforts to increase SDOH assessment and use in critical care should also gather and integrate the perspectives of patients and caregivers regarding the collection and use of SDOH in the ICU.</p>","PeriodicalId":93876,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","volume":" ","pages":"1583-1591"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11568501/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202404-434OC","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: Current critical care practice does not integrate social determinants of health (SDOH) in systematic or standardized ways. Routine assessment of SDOH in the intensive care unit (ICU) may improve clinical decision making, patient- and family-centered outcomes, and clinician well-being. Objective: Given that the appropriateness and feasibility of SDOH assessment in the ICU is unknown, we aimed to understand how ICU clinicians think about and use SDOH. Methods: We conducted semistructured interviews with clinicians focused on barriers to and facilitators of assessing SDOH during critical illness and perceptions of screening for SDOH in the ICU. We used chart-stimulated recall to assist clinicians in reflecting on how SDOH applied to and was used in patients' care. After deidentifying interviews, we analyzed transcripts guided by a thematic analysis approach using a combination of inductive and deductive coding, the latter framed within the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention SDOH Healthy People framework. Results: We completed interviews with 30 clinicians in a variety of professional roles. The majority of clinicians self-identified as men (n = 17; 56.7%) of White race (n = 25; 83.3%). Clinicians contextualize their use of SDOH within three frames of reference: 1) their own identity and experiences; 2) their relationships and communication with patients and caregivers; and 3) immediate structures of care around ICU patients, including clinician advocacy, care transitions, and readmission. Clinicians identified that discussing SDOH could allow them to recognize bias faced by their patients, elucidate drivers of critical illness, and navigate communication with patients' caregivers. Clinicians worried about ICU-specific factors impeding the discussion of SDOH, including time constraints and acuity, high stakes and emotions, and negative anticipatory emotions. Conclusions: Clinicians gather SDOH during critical illness both to understand their patients' stories and to provide individualized care, which may lead to better clinician satisfaction and patient- and family-centered care outcomes. Educational and operational efforts to increase SDOH assessment and use in critical care should also gather and integrate the perspectives of patients and caregivers regarding the collection and use of SDOH in the ICU.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
寻找 "公平领域":临床医生如何在重症监护中操作社会决定因素的定性研究。
导言:目前的重症监护实践并未以系统化或标准化的方式整合健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)。在重症监护病房(ICU)中对 SDOH 进行常规评估可改善临床决策、以患者和家属为中心的治疗效果以及临床医生的福利。鉴于在重症监护室进行 SDOH 评估的适宜性和可行性尚不清楚,我们旨在了解重症监护室临床医生是如何考虑和使用 SDOH 的:方法:我们对临床医生进行了半结构化访谈,重点是危重症期间评估 SDOH 的障碍和促进因素,以及对 ICU 中 SDOH 筛查的看法。我们使用图表刺激回忆法来帮助临床医生反思 SDOH 如何应用于患者护理中。在对访谈内容进行身份验证后,我们采用归纳和演绎相结合的主题分析方法对记录誊本进行了分析,后者以美国疾病控制中心 SDOH 健康人群框架为框架:我们完成了对 30 位不同职业角色的临床医生的访谈。大多数临床医生自我认同为男性(17 人,占 56.7%)、白种人(25 人,占 83.3%)。临床医生将他们使用 SDOH 的背景纳入三个参考框架:1)他们自己的身份和经历;2)他们与患者和护理人员的关系和沟通;3)ICU 患者的直接护理结构,包括临床医生宣传、护理过渡和再入院。临床医生认为,讨论 SDOH 可使他们认识到患者面临的偏见,阐明危重病的驱动因素,并引导与患者护理人员的沟通。临床医生担心重症监护病房的特殊因素会阻碍 SDOH 的讨论,这些因素包括时间限制和严重程度、高风险和情绪,以及消极的预期情绪:讨论:临床医生在危重症期间收集 SDOH 信息,既能了解患者的故事,又能提供个性化护理,从而提高临床医生的满意度,改善以患者和家属为中心的护理效果。在危重症护理中增加 SDOH 评估和使用的教育和操作工作也应收集和整合患者和护理人员对 ICU 中 SDOH 收集和使用的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Airway Remodeling in Cystic Fibrosis Is Heterogeneous. County Level Social Determinates of Health and Correlation with COPD Prevalence in the US. Lest a Smoky Haze of Doubt Suffocate Progress Towards Better Pulse Oximeters. Lung Function Recovery from Pulmonary Exacerbations Treated with Oral Antibiotics in Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia. Trends in the Treatment of Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1