An analysis of prescribing data in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder for adolescents and adults in Scotland.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY BJPsych Open Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI:10.1192/bjo.2024.722
Andrew Radley, Barry Melia, Donald Maciver, Marion Rutherford, Marie Boilson
{"title":"An analysis of prescribing data in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder for adolescents and adults in Scotland.","authors":"Andrew Radley, Barry Melia, Donald Maciver, Marion Rutherford, Marie Boilson","doi":"10.1192/bjo.2024.722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medication, combined with environmental and psychosocial support, can mitigate adverse outcomes in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). There is a need for research into regional and national prescription volumes and patterns, especially among adults.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study analysed prescribing patterns for medications commonly used to treat ADHD in adolescents and adults.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data was extracted from the NHS Scotland Prescribing Information System on prescriptions for 7806 adolescents (aged 10-19 years) and 4998 adults (aged 20-59 years) in 2019. This included medications listed under Section 4.4 of the British National Formulary. We explored 2019 prescription patterns across different regions and estimated ADHD prevalence levels. Additionally, we assessed changes in dispensed prescriptions, defined daily dose and costs, compared with figures from 2010.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2010 and 2019, prescriptions for ADHD medications increased (dispensed prescriptions +233.2%, defined daily dose +234.9%, cost +216.6%). Despite these increases, analysis indicated that in 2019, considering a 5% estimated ADHD prevalence among adolescents, 73% were not prescribed medication, increasing to 81% at a 7% estimated prevalence. Similarly, among adults with a 2% estimated prevalence, 91% were not prescribed medication, rising to 96% at a 4% estimated prevalence. Regional disparities were evident, with 41-96% of adolescents and 85-100% of adults, based on ADHD prevalence estimates, not receiving a prescription, depending on area.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although prescription rates for ADHD medication have increased over time, the data do not indicate excessive use of medication. Instead, they suggest that for some groups there is a lower use of medication compared with expected prevalence figures, especially among adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":9038,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Open","volume":"10 5","pages":"e143"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2024.722","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Medication, combined with environmental and psychosocial support, can mitigate adverse outcomes in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). There is a need for research into regional and national prescription volumes and patterns, especially among adults.

Aims: This study analysed prescribing patterns for medications commonly used to treat ADHD in adolescents and adults.

Method: Data was extracted from the NHS Scotland Prescribing Information System on prescriptions for 7806 adolescents (aged 10-19 years) and 4998 adults (aged 20-59 years) in 2019. This included medications listed under Section 4.4 of the British National Formulary. We explored 2019 prescription patterns across different regions and estimated ADHD prevalence levels. Additionally, we assessed changes in dispensed prescriptions, defined daily dose and costs, compared with figures from 2010.

Results: Between 2010 and 2019, prescriptions for ADHD medications increased (dispensed prescriptions +233.2%, defined daily dose +234.9%, cost +216.6%). Despite these increases, analysis indicated that in 2019, considering a 5% estimated ADHD prevalence among adolescents, 73% were not prescribed medication, increasing to 81% at a 7% estimated prevalence. Similarly, among adults with a 2% estimated prevalence, 91% were not prescribed medication, rising to 96% at a 4% estimated prevalence. Regional disparities were evident, with 41-96% of adolescents and 85-100% of adults, based on ADHD prevalence estimates, not receiving a prescription, depending on area.

Conclusions: Although prescription rates for ADHD medication have increased over time, the data do not indicate excessive use of medication. Instead, they suggest that for some groups there is a lower use of medication compared with expected prevalence figures, especially among adults.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
苏格兰青少年和成人注意缺陷多动障碍处方数据分析。
背景:药物治疗与环境和社会心理支持相结合,可以减轻注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的不良后果。目的:本研究分析了治疗青少年和成人多动症常用药物的处方模式:从苏格兰国家医疗服务体系处方信息系统中提取了2019年7806名青少年(10-19岁)和4998名成人(20-59岁)的处方数据。其中包括《英国国家处方集》第 4.4 节所列药物。我们探讨了不同地区的 2019 年处方模式,并估算了多动症的患病率水平。此外,与 2010 年的数据相比,我们还评估了配药处方、规定日剂量和成本的变化:从 2010 年到 2019 年,ADHD 药物的处方量有所增加(已配处方量增加了 233.2%,规定日剂量增加了 234.9%,费用增加了 216.6%)。尽管出现了这些增长,但分析表明,在 2019 年,考虑到青少年多动症的估计发病率为 5%,73% 的青少年未获得处方药物治疗,而在估计发病率为 7% 的情况下,这一比例将增至 81%。同样,在估计患病率为 2% 的成年人中,91% 的人没有开药,而在估计患病率为 4% 的情况下,这一比例上升到 96%。地区差异明显,根据多动症患病率估计,41%-96%的青少年和85%-100%的成年人未获得处方,具体取决于地区:结论:虽然多动症药物处方率随着时间的推移而增加,但这些数据并不表明药物的过度使用。相反,这些数据表明,与预期的患病率数字相比,某些群体的药物使用率较低,尤其是成年人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJPsych Open
BJPsych Open Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
610
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Announcing the launch of BJPsych Open, an exciting new open access online journal for the publication of all methodologically sound research in all fields of psychiatry and disciplines related to mental health. BJPsych Open will maintain the highest scientific, peer review, and ethical standards of the BJPsych, ensure rapid publication for authors whilst sharing research with no cost to the reader in the spirit of maximising dissemination and public engagement. Cascade submission from BJPsych to BJPsych Open is a new option for authors whose first priority is rapid online publication with the prestigious BJPsych brand. Authors will also retain copyright to their works under a creative commons license.
期刊最新文献
Comparing measurements of lithium treatment efficacy in people with bipolar disorder: systematic review and meta-analysis - CORRIGENDUM. Factors associated with mental health outcomes in a Muslim community following the Christchurch terrorist attack. Breaking barriers in the career development of women in academic psychiatry. Cognitive, adaptive and daily life functioning in adults with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Depression in childhood to early adulthood and respiratory health in early adulthood.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1