Revisiting diabetes risk of olanzapine versus aripiprazole in serious mental illness care.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY BJPsych Open Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI:10.1192/bjo.2024.727
Denis Agniel, Sharon-Lise T Normand, John W Newcomer, Katya Zelevinsky, Jason Poulos, Jeannette Tsuei, Marcela Horvitz-Lennon
{"title":"Revisiting diabetes risk of olanzapine versus aripiprazole in serious mental illness care.","authors":"Denis Agniel, Sharon-Lise T Normand, John W Newcomer, Katya Zelevinsky, Jason Poulos, Jeannette Tsuei, Marcela Horvitz-Lennon","doi":"10.1192/bjo.2024.727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exposure to second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) carries a risk of type 2 diabetes, but questions remain about the diabetogenic effects of SGAs.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To assess the diabetes risk associated with two frequently used SGAs.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of adults with schizophrenia, bipolar I disorder or severe major depressive disorder (MDD) exposed during 2008-2013 to continuous monotherapy with aripiprazole or olanzapine for up to 24 months, with no pre-period exposure to other antipsychotics. Newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes was quantified with targeted minimum loss-based estimation; risk was summarised as the restricted mean survival time (RMST), the average number of diabetes-free months. Sensitivity analyses were used to evaluate potential confounding by indication.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Aripiprazole-treated patients had fewer diabetes-free months compared with olanzapine-treated patients. RMSTs were longer in olanzapine-treated patients, by 0.25 months [95% CI: 0.14, 0.36], 0.16 months [0.02, 0.31] and 0.22 months [0.01, 0.44] among patients with schizophrenia, bipolar I disorder and severe MDD, respectively. Although some sensitivity analyses suggest a risk of unobserved confounding, E-values indicate that this risk is not severe.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using robust methods and accounting for exposure duration effects, we found a slightly higher risk of type 2 diabetes associated with aripiprazole compared with olanzapine monotherapy regardless of diagnosis. If this result was subject to unmeasured selection despite our methods, it would suggest clinician success in identifying olanzapine candidates with low diabetes risk. Confirmatory research is needed, but this insight suggests a potentially larger role for olanzapine in the treatment of well-selected patients, particularly for those with schizophrenia, given the drug's effectiveness advantage among them.</p>","PeriodicalId":9038,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Open","volume":"10 5","pages":"e144"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2024.727","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Exposure to second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) carries a risk of type 2 diabetes, but questions remain about the diabetogenic effects of SGAs.

Aims: To assess the diabetes risk associated with two frequently used SGAs.

Method: This was a retrospective cohort study of adults with schizophrenia, bipolar I disorder or severe major depressive disorder (MDD) exposed during 2008-2013 to continuous monotherapy with aripiprazole or olanzapine for up to 24 months, with no pre-period exposure to other antipsychotics. Newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes was quantified with targeted minimum loss-based estimation; risk was summarised as the restricted mean survival time (RMST), the average number of diabetes-free months. Sensitivity analyses were used to evaluate potential confounding by indication.

Results: Aripiprazole-treated patients had fewer diabetes-free months compared with olanzapine-treated patients. RMSTs were longer in olanzapine-treated patients, by 0.25 months [95% CI: 0.14, 0.36], 0.16 months [0.02, 0.31] and 0.22 months [0.01, 0.44] among patients with schizophrenia, bipolar I disorder and severe MDD, respectively. Although some sensitivity analyses suggest a risk of unobserved confounding, E-values indicate that this risk is not severe.

Conclusions: Using robust methods and accounting for exposure duration effects, we found a slightly higher risk of type 2 diabetes associated with aripiprazole compared with olanzapine monotherapy regardless of diagnosis. If this result was subject to unmeasured selection despite our methods, it would suggest clinician success in identifying olanzapine candidates with low diabetes risk. Confirmatory research is needed, but this insight suggests a potentially larger role for olanzapine in the treatment of well-selected patients, particularly for those with schizophrenia, given the drug's effectiveness advantage among them.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新审视奥氮平与阿立哌唑在重症精神病护理中的糖尿病风险。
背景:暴露于第二代抗精神病药物(SGAs)有罹患2型糖尿病的风险,但SGAs的致糖尿病效应仍存在疑问:这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象为2008年至2013年期间接受阿立哌唑或奥氮平连续单药治疗长达24个月的精神分裂症、双相情感障碍(I型)或严重重度抑郁障碍(MDD)成人患者,患者在治疗前未接触过其他抗精神病药物。新诊断出的2型糖尿病采用目标最小损失估计法进行量化;风险总结为受限平均生存时间(RMST),即无糖尿病的平均月数。敏感性分析用于评估适应症的潜在混杂因素:结果:与奥氮平治疗患者相比,阿立哌唑治疗患者的无糖尿病月数较少。在精神分裂症、双相情感障碍 I 和严重 MDD 患者中,奥氮平治疗患者的无糖尿病月数更长,分别为 0.25 个月 [95% CI:0.14, 0.36]、0.16 个月 [0.02, 0.31] 和 0.22 个月 [0.01, 0.44]。尽管一些敏感性分析表明存在未观察到的混杂风险,但E值表明这种风险并不严重:使用稳健的方法并考虑暴露持续时间的影响,我们发现与奥氮平单药治疗相比,阿立哌唑治疗2型糖尿病的风险略高,与诊断无关。如果这一结果是由于我们的方法存在未测量的选择而造成的,那么这将表明临床医生成功地识别出了低糖尿病风险的奥氮平候选者。我们还需要进行确认性研究,但这一研究结果表明,鉴于奥氮平在精神分裂症患者中的疗效优势,奥氮平在治疗经过严格筛选的患者,尤其是精神分裂症患者时可能会发挥更大的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJPsych Open
BJPsych Open Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
610
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Announcing the launch of BJPsych Open, an exciting new open access online journal for the publication of all methodologically sound research in all fields of psychiatry and disciplines related to mental health. BJPsych Open will maintain the highest scientific, peer review, and ethical standards of the BJPsych, ensure rapid publication for authors whilst sharing research with no cost to the reader in the spirit of maximising dissemination and public engagement. Cascade submission from BJPsych to BJPsych Open is a new option for authors whose first priority is rapid online publication with the prestigious BJPsych brand. Authors will also retain copyright to their works under a creative commons license.
期刊最新文献
Comparing measurements of lithium treatment efficacy in people with bipolar disorder: systematic review and meta-analysis - CORRIGENDUM. Factors associated with mental health outcomes in a Muslim community following the Christchurch terrorist attack. Breaking barriers in the career development of women in academic psychiatry. Cognitive, adaptive and daily life functioning in adults with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Depression in childhood to early adulthood and respiratory health in early adulthood.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1