Gastroesophageal reflux after per oral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia: Results of a monocentric cohort

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Clinics and research in hepatology and gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1016/j.clinre.2024.102440
Laurine Estermann , Sophie Testu , Jérôme Rivory , Florian Rostain , Thierry Ponchon , Mathieu Pioche , Sabine Roman , François Mion
{"title":"Gastroesophageal reflux after per oral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia: Results of a monocentric cohort","authors":"Laurine Estermann ,&nbsp;Sophie Testu ,&nbsp;Jérôme Rivory ,&nbsp;Florian Rostain ,&nbsp;Thierry Ponchon ,&nbsp;Mathieu Pioche ,&nbsp;Sabine Roman ,&nbsp;François Mion","doi":"10.1016/j.clinre.2024.102440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and study aims</h3><p>Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has become the first line treatment for achalasia, but controversies remain about the prevalence of gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) after the procedure. The aim of this study was to evaluate post-POEM GERD by a retrospective analysis of a single center cohort.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p>Achalasia patients aged 18 or above, who underwent POEM between 2012 and 2021, were included, provided they had an endoscopic control of reflux at least one year after POEM. GERD symptoms based on GerdQ questionnaire, and proton pomp inhibitors (PPI) consumption were also evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among a consecutive cohort of 422 patients treated by POEM, 254 patients were included. Endoscopic results were available after a mean follow-up of 1.9 ± 1.5 years. 71/254 patients (28 %) had erosive esophagitis (86 % Los Angeles Grade A or B). At the last follow-up (mean 4.5 ± 2.2 years), clinical success of POEM (Eckardt score ≤ 3) was achieved in 79.5 % of patients. 44.5 % of patients were on PPI. Mean GerdQ score was 2.2 ± 2.7, with only 13 patients (6.5 %) with a score ≥ 8.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In this cohort of achalasia patients with an endoscopic follow-up at least 1 year after POEM, GERD did not appear a major threat concern: clinical symptoms were mild in most cases, as was the degree of erosive esophagitis. Furthermore, at the time of last follow up, less than half of patients required treatment with PPI.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10424,"journal":{"name":"Clinics and research in hepatology and gastroenterology","volume":"48 8","pages":"Article 102440"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics and research in hepatology and gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221074012400161X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and study aims

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has become the first line treatment for achalasia, but controversies remain about the prevalence of gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) after the procedure. The aim of this study was to evaluate post-POEM GERD by a retrospective analysis of a single center cohort.

Patients and methods

Achalasia patients aged 18 or above, who underwent POEM between 2012 and 2021, were included, provided they had an endoscopic control of reflux at least one year after POEM. GERD symptoms based on GerdQ questionnaire, and proton pomp inhibitors (PPI) consumption were also evaluated.

Results

Among a consecutive cohort of 422 patients treated by POEM, 254 patients were included. Endoscopic results were available after a mean follow-up of 1.9 ± 1.5 years. 71/254 patients (28 %) had erosive esophagitis (86 % Los Angeles Grade A or B). At the last follow-up (mean 4.5 ± 2.2 years), clinical success of POEM (Eckardt score ≤ 3) was achieved in 79.5 % of patients. 44.5 % of patients were on PPI. Mean GerdQ score was 2.2 ± 2.7, with only 13 patients (6.5 %) with a score ≥ 8.

Conclusion

In this cohort of achalasia patients with an endoscopic follow-up at least 1 year after POEM, GERD did not appear a major threat concern: clinical symptoms were mild in most cases, as was the degree of erosive esophagitis. Furthermore, at the time of last follow up, less than half of patients required treatment with PPI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
贲门失弛缓症经口腔内窥镜肌切开术后的胃食管反流:单中心队列研究结果。
背景和研究目的:口周内镜下肌切开术(POEM)已成为治疗贲门失弛缓症的一线疗法,但关于术后胃食管反流病(GERD)的发病率仍存在争议。本研究旨在通过对单中心队列进行回顾性分析,评估手术后胃食管反流病的发病率:纳入年龄在 18 岁或以上、在 2012 年至 2021 年期间接受过 POEM 的胃食管反流患者,条件是他们在 POEM 术后至少一年内通过内镜控制了反流。根据GerdQ问卷对胃食管反流症状和质子泵抑制剂(PPI)使用情况进行了评估:结果:在接受 POEM 治疗的 422 名患者中,有 254 名患者接受了内窥镜检查。平均随访时间为(1.9 ± 1.5)年,内镜检查结果已出炉。71/254名患者(28%)患有侵蚀性食管炎(86%为洛杉矶A级或B级)。在最后一次随访(平均 4.5 ± 2.2 年)中,79.5% 的患者获得了 POEM 的临床成功(艾卡得分≤ 3)。44.5%的患者服用了 PPI。平均 GerdQ 得分为 2.2 ± 2.7,只有 13 名患者(6.5%)的 GerdQ 得分≥8:在 POEM 术后至少 1 年进行内镜随访的这批贲门失弛缓症患者中,胃食管反流病似乎并不是主要的威胁因素:大多数病例的临床症状和侵蚀性食管炎的程度都很轻微。此外,在最后一次随访时,只有不到一半的患者需要使用 PPI 治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
198
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology publishes high-quality original research papers in the field of hepatology and gastroenterology. The editors put the accent on rapid communication of new research and clinical developments and so called "hot topic" issues. Following a clear Editorial line, besides original articles and case reports, each issue features editorials, commentaries and reviews. The journal encourages research and discussion between all those involved in the specialty on an international level. All articles are peer reviewed by international experts, the articles in press are online and indexed in the international databases (Current Contents, Pubmed, Scopus, Science Direct). Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology is a subscription journal (with optional open access), which allows you to publish your research without any cost to you (unless you proactively chose the open access option). Your article will be available to all researchers around the globe whose institution has a subscription to the journal.
期刊最新文献
Primary hepatic large B-cell lymphoma Safety and efficacy of the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in hepatectomy for liver cancer Prolonged survival in women with hepatocellular carcinoma: A French observational study A Review Investigating delays in Crohn's disease diagnosis. Intra- and inter-patient diversity in hepatocellular carcinoma based on phosphorylation profiles—A pilot study in a single institution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1