Hypofractionated Preoperative Radiation Therapy for Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Systematic Review.

IF 6.4 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.07.2151
Ronan Joyce, Emer Herlihy, Naomi Lavan, Charles Gillham
{"title":"Hypofractionated Preoperative Radiation Therapy for Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Ronan Joyce, Emer Herlihy, Naomi Lavan, Charles Gillham","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.07.2151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Hypofractionated radiation therapy is being used more frequently for many common cancer sites. Conventionally fractionated radiation therapy treatment regimens have remained the standard of care when radiation therapy is indicated for soft tissue sarcoma (STS). The aim of this study was to systematically review published data on the use of preoperative hypofractionated radiation therapy as part of a curative treatment paradigm in patients with STS. Herein, we summarize current evidence for the use of hypofractionated radiation therapy in the preoperative treatment of STS.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>We conducted a database search for prospectively or retrospectively collected data on patients with a diagnosis of STS treated with hypofractionated radiation therapy. Studies evaluating STS of all histologic subtypes affecting extremities or trunks were included in the search. Articles were screened by 2 independent reviewers for inclusion in this review. Patient, treatment, toxicity, and outcome data were recorded and collated from selected studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five articles are included in this review. Nine prospective trials have been published since 2020. Dose fractionations range from 25 to 40 Gy in 5 fractions or 28-42.75 Gy in 8-15 fractions. Local control and overall survival outcomes are consistent with historical data for conventionally fractionated radiation therapy. Acute toxicity and wound complication rates are in keeping with acceptable results. Late toxicity data are limited and require longer follow-up. Rates of pathologic complete response are promising across all studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a growing body of evidence supporting hypofractionation as safe and effective in the preoperative treatment of STS. This review highlights potential areas that could be further investigated to optimize preoperative treatment for STS.</p>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":" ","pages":"13-27"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.07.2151","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Hypofractionated radiation therapy is being used more frequently for many common cancer sites. Conventionally fractionated radiation therapy treatment regimens have remained the standard of care when radiation therapy is indicated for soft tissue sarcoma (STS). The aim of this study was to systematically review published data on the use of preoperative hypofractionated radiation therapy as part of a curative treatment paradigm in patients with STS. Herein, we summarize current evidence for the use of hypofractionated radiation therapy in the preoperative treatment of STS.

Methods and materials: We conducted a database search for prospectively or retrospectively collected data on patients with a diagnosis of STS treated with hypofractionated radiation therapy. Studies evaluating STS of all histologic subtypes affecting extremities or trunks were included in the search. Articles were screened by 2 independent reviewers for inclusion in this review. Patient, treatment, toxicity, and outcome data were recorded and collated from selected studies.

Results: Twenty-five articles are included in this review. Nine prospective trials have been published since 2020. Dose fractionations range from 25 to 40 Gy in 5 fractions or 28-42.75 Gy in 8-15 fractions. Local control and overall survival outcomes are consistent with historical data for conventionally fractionated radiation therapy. Acute toxicity and wound complication rates are in keeping with acceptable results. Late toxicity data are limited and require longer follow-up. Rates of pathologic complete response are promising across all studies.

Conclusions: There is a growing body of evidence supporting hypofractionation as safe and effective in the preoperative treatment of STS. This review highlights potential areas that could be further investigated to optimize preoperative treatment for STS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
治疗软组织肉瘤的术前低分量放疗:系统回顾
目的:超分割放射治疗(HFRT)正越来越多地用于许多常见癌症部位。当放疗适用于软组织肉瘤(STS)时,传统的分次放疗方案仍然是治疗的标准。本研究旨在系统回顾已发表的关于术前低分次放疗作为软组织肉瘤患者治愈性治疗模式的一部分的数据。在此,我们总结了目前在 STS 术前治疗中使用超分割放疗的证据:我们在数据库中搜索了前瞻性或回顾性收集的有关诊断为软组织肉瘤并接受过高剂量放射治疗的患者的数据。搜索范围包括对影响四肢或躯干的所有组织学亚型软组织肉瘤进行评估的研究。文章由两名独立审稿人筛选后纳入本综述。结果:25 篇文章被纳入本综述。自 2020 年以来,共发表了九项前瞻性试验。剂量分次范围为25-40Gy(5次分次)或28-42.75Gy(8-15次分次)。局部控制和总生存率结果与传统分次放疗的历史数据一致。急性毒性和伤口并发症发生率符合可接受的结果。晚期毒性数据有限,需要更长时间的随访。所有研究的病理完全反应率都很乐观:越来越多的证据支持低分次治疗在 STS 术前治疗中安全有效。本综述强调了可进一步研究的潜在领域,以优化软组织肉瘤的术前治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
2538
审稿时长
6.6 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (IJROBP), known in the field as the Red Journal, publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, and both education and health policy as it relates to the field. This journal has a particular interest in original contributions of the following types: prospective clinical trials, outcomes research, and large database interrogation. In addition, it seeks reports of high-impact innovations in single or combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization, normal tissue protection (including both precision avoidance and pharmacologic means), brachytherapy, particle irradiation, and cancer imaging. Technical advances related to dosimetry and conformal radiation treatment planning are of interest, as are basic science studies investigating tumor physiology and the molecular biology underlying cancer and normal tissue radiation response.
期刊最新文献
Conjunction Junction, Preserve the Function: Nonoperative Management of Head and Neck Rhabdomyosarcoma. Getting Cheeky With It: Adult Rhabdomyosarcoma. In Regard to Song et al. In Reply to Khor et al. Looking Forward and Looking Back: Cutting-Edge Advances and Long-Standing Controversies in Head and Neck Cancer Management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1